Rossmiller
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ronnie Abrams
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-26 | N/A | Trial of U.S. v. Cordell Fitts | Court of Honorable Ronnie A... | View |
EFTA00032757.pdf
This document consists of an internal email chain within the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated June 15-16, 2021, discussing the upcoming suppression hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence addresses legal strategy, including Maxwell's filing of 12 separate memos of law to evade page limits, and clarifies the identity of Stan Pottinger as a lawyer from Boies Schiller who represented a plaintiff in a related civil action. The emails also reference previous proceedings before Judge Sweet and Judge McMahon.
EFTA00014378.pdf
This document is an automatic email reply dated August 26, 2019, likely from AUSA Rossmiller. The sender states they are unavailable due to being in trial for 'U.S. v. Cordell Fitts' before Judge Ronnie Abrams and provides alternative contacts for matters related to 'United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB)'.
EFTA00009834.pdf
This document contains a series of email exchanges between defense attorney Joe Nascimento and prosecutors from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding a client connected to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The emails discuss scheduling meetings, proffers, and interviews, as well as confirming representation after the passing of the client's previous attorney, Alan Ross.
DOJ-OGR-00008365.jpg
This legal document, dated December 13, 2021, is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense argues that the Court should permit the testimony of three witnesses—Mr. Scarola, Mr. Edwards, and Mr. Glassman—to establish motive and bias of Maxwell's accusers, after the government refused to stipulate. The document details the proposed testimony of attorney Jack Scarola, including his prior representation of an accuser named 'Carolyn' in a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein and his communications with the government.
DOJ-OGR-00000825.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 19-2221, detailing legal proceedings involving Jeffrey Epstein between July 16 and July 23, 2019. Key events include the filing of letters by Epstein's attorneys regarding bail, the appearance of several new attorneys, a bond hearing on July 18 where bail was denied by Judge Richard M. Berman, and the subsequent filing of a Notice of Appeal by Epstein. The document lists all parties present at the hearing, including prosecutors, defense attorneys, and law enforcement agents.
DOJ-OGR-00000783.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from July 16-23, 2019, detailing the proceedings of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 19-2221). It documents the denial of Epstein's bail during a hearing on July 18, 2019, presided over by Judge Richard M. Berman, attended by FBI and NYPD representatives. Following the remand order, Epstein's defense team filed a Notice of Appeal on July 22, 2019, along with a sealed document placed in the vault.
DOJ-OGR-00000521.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, detailing a bail hearing. The prosecution, represented by Mr. Rossmiller, argues that the defendant should be detained, citing the defense's failure to provide detailed financial information and the legal presumption of detention for sex trafficking charges, which is strengthened by the defendant's prior sex offense conviction. The judge interacts with the prosecutor to clarify the government's burden of proof in the matter.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity