This document appears to be page 295 of a manuscript or legal memoir (possibly a draft, given the 'WC' word count header). It discusses legal arguments regarding affirmative action, specifically referencing admissions at Davis Medical School (likely the Bakke case). The text argues for individualized assessment over racial quotas and quotes civil rights leader Roy Wilkins to support the position against proportional representation.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Roy Wilkins | Civil Rights Leader |
Quoted by the authors as opposing proportional representation/quotas.
|
| We | Authors/Narrators |
The unidentified authors describing their legal arguments and filings regarding affirmative action.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Davis Medical School |
Mentioned in the context of admission policies and individual black applicants.
|
|
| Admission Committee |
The committee at Davis Medical School responsible for evaluating applicant records.
|
|
| The Court |
Implied Supreme Court; the body the authors 'urged' to require specific affirmative action programs.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Referenced in the context of societal values and the 'dream of a color blind America'.
|
"It is ridiculous for Negroes to claim that because they are 40 percent of the population, they should have 40 percent of the jobs, 40 percent of the elected offices, etc."Source
"This is self-defeating nonsense, for no person of ability wants to be limited in his horizons by an arbitrary quota..."Source
"Negroes need to insist on being among the best, not on being the best of the second- or third-raters."Source
"Schools may and, we think, should evaluate both grades and test scores in the light of a candidate's background..."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,761 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document