| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
We (Authors)
|
Citation |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
USAID
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unknown (Miami Beach Household)
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Conversation where Goldberger and Roy assured AUSA that Epstein would not get work release. | Unknown | View |
| 2025-02-26 | N/A | Charles Finch's dinner at Madeo | Madeo | View |
| 2008-12-04 | N/A | Meeting involving 'Roy' | Implied West Palm Beach or ... | View |
| 2008-12-04 | N/A | Meeting with Roy | Implied West Palm Beach or ... | View |
| 2008-06-24 | N/A | Conference call scheduled for 3:30 (PM) regarding Epstein matter issues. | Teleconference | View |
This document is an email thread from November 2008 between attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS). Lefkowitz arranges a meeting, noting he will be seeing Jeffrey Epstein during his trip to update him on civil cases, but expresses a desire for his meeting with the AUSA to be primarily social. The AUSA confirms availability and mentions an upcoming email to Lefkowitz and 'Roy' regarding two issues related to Mr. Epstein.
This document is an email chain between Assistant U.S. Attorneys dated November 20, 2008, reacting with surprise and anger to the news that Jeffrey Epstein was granted work release. The prosecutors discuss how Epstein's lawyers (Goldberger and Roy) had previously assured them this would not happen. The emails allege that the 'Florida Science Foundation' exists solely to employ Epstein, allowing him to spend his days at his lawyer's office rather than in confinement.
An email exchange between attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) regarding a meeting concerning Jeffrey Epstein. The AUSA asks if Lefkowitz will attend a meeting on Thursday with 'Roy' (likely Roy Black). Lefkowitz responds on December 3, 2008, stating he does not plan to attend.
An email chain from December 2008 between attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach. They discuss an upcoming meeting involving 'Roy' which Lefkowitz states he will not attend, and arrange a phone call.
This document is an email chain from June 2008 involving Jack Goldberger, an Assistant U.S. Attorney, and other legal counsel (Roy and Jay Lefkowitz). The key content is a notification that the Deputy Attorney General determined federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein was appropriate. Epstein was given a deadline of June 30, 2008, to comply with a plea agreement that required him to plead guilty, be sentenced, and surrender for imprisonment.
This document is page 2 of a court filing (Document 528) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 6, 2021. It is a legal memorandum arguing points regarding attorney-client privilege, specifically focusing on waiver and implied waiver. The text cites various legal precedents (United States v. Krug, In re von Bulow) to establish that privilege belongs to the client and cannot generally be waived by the attorney without consent, unless the client asserts an advice-of-counsel defense.
This document is Page 29 (transcript page 109 of 131) of a concordance or word index for a legal deposition or court transcript, produced by J. Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. It lists keywords alphabetically from 'N' to 'T' alongside their page and line numbers in the main transcript. Significant keywords include 'Recarey' (likely Detective Nick Recarey), 'Shelling' (likely an attorney), 'Palm' (Palm Beach), 'police', 'photographs', 'sex', 'naked', 'massage' terms (oil/oils), and 'polycythemia' (a specific medical condition).
This document appears to be a diary entry or social column draft (possibly by a high-profile socialite or journalist connected to the Epstein investigation files) recounting events surrounding the 2017 Academy Awards. The narrator describes attending exclusive dinners and parties with high-profile celebrities including Oliver Stone, Mick Jagger, and Casey Affleck. The text details specific interactions, such as Casey Affleck stepping in as the narrator's escort to Guy Oseary's party because 'Damien' was sick, and a brief encounter involving Monica Lewinsky.
This document is a scanned excerpt, labeled Chapter 55, containing a letter written by former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta on March 20, 2011. In the letter, Acosta addresses the public regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case during his tenure (2005-2009), noting the involvement of Palm Beach Police and the State Attorney. He discusses jurisdictional issues, specifically the requirement of an 'interstate nexus' for federal crimes, and mentions Epstein's attorney, Roy.
This document is an email printout dated November 1, 2016, forwarded by Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'Jeffrey E.' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') to himself. The email subject is 'contacts' and contains a raw, unstructured list of names including prominent scientists (Susskind, Dawkins, Gellman), tech figures (Thiel, Hoffman, Sergey), and political figures (Clinton, Kerry, Schumer, Ehud Barak, Prince Andrew). It also contains a line of apparent medical/personal notes regarding cholesterol medication (Crestor), prostate issues, and diet.
This document is an email sent by Jeffrey Epstein to himself on October 30, 2016, with the subject line 'contacts'. The body of the email contains a list of high-profile names, including prominent scientists (Susskind, Minsky/Edelman context, Gould), tech figures (Hoffman, Sinofsky, Sergey), and politicians (Clinton, Richardson, Mandelson, Ehud, Andrew). It also includes a section seemingly related to health or medication (Crestor, prostatitis, protein, exercise) and obscure codes or abbreviations (LSJ, BBJ).
This document appears to be page 295 of a manuscript or legal memoir (possibly a draft, given the 'WC' word count header). It discusses legal arguments regarding affirmative action, specifically referencing admissions at Davis Medical School (likely the Bakke case). The text argues for individualized assessment over racial quotas and quotes civil rights leader Roy Wilkins to support the position against proportional representation.
This document, stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018067, appears to be a schedule or itinerary page for Wednesday, September 15, 2010. It lists various high-profile events in New York City, including Fashion Week presentations for Rachel Roy and Bill Blass, a marketing awards ceremony by Min Online, and conferences hosted by the Business Development Institute and The Economist. The document provides specific times, addresses, contact emails, and lists of speakers for the conferences.
This document is an excerpt from 'Chapter 55' of a larger work, containing a letter written by former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta on March 20, 2011. In the letter, Acosta addresses the public regarding his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case between 2005 and 2009, noting the involvement of the Palm Beach Police and State Attorney. The text discusses jurisdictional issues (state vs. federal), the hiring of underage females for massages, and mentions Epstein's attorney, Roy (presumably Roy Black). The right side of the page is cut off, obscuring the ends of many sentences.
This document is a page from a contact book ('Little Black Book') containing names, addresses, and phone numbers for individuals with surnames starting with 'L'. Notable entries include musician Simon Le Bon, actor Christopher Lawford, and director Doug Liman. The document also includes a list of household staff (driver, housekeepers) associated with a Miami Beach property, though the primary name for that entry is cut off at the top of the column.
This document is a table of contents from a 2013 publication called 'Tax Topics', listing summaries of tax-related articles, court cases, and legislative updates from late 2002 and 2003. The content is exclusively about general U.S. tax law, case precedents, and policy proposals from that era. Although the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was collected during a congressional investigation, it contains no information about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, finances, or activities.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity