DOJ-OGR-00019331.jpg
655 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
6
Organizations
0
Locations
5
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
655 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines a procedural history concerning sealed information from civil matters. The Government successfully modified a protective order in one court (Court-1) but not another (Court-2) to obtain materials for a grand jury investigation, which were then turned over by a 'Recipient'. The current court is now permitting the Defendant, who learned of this through discovery, to provide the sealed information back to Court-1 and Court-2 for their own determination of relevance.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Recipient | Recipient |
Mentioned as the party who turned over materials to the Government after a civil protective order was modified by Cou...
|
| Defendant | Defendant |
Learned of sealed information through discovery, is permitted by the Court to provide this information to other court...
|
| counsel | counsel |
Mentioned in a quote from the Government regarding making sealed applications to unseal materials.
|
| judicial decision makers | judicial decision makers |
Mentioned as part of the sealed information that the Defendant is now permitted to provide to other courts.
|
Organizations (6)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
Sought modification of protective orders, received materials from the Recipient, filed a letter on the public docket,...
|
| criminal grand jury | legal body |
The entity whose subpoenas prompted the Government to seek modification of civil protective orders.
|
| Court-1 | court |
A court that permitted the modification of a civil protective order in April 2019.
|
| Court-2 | court |
A court that did not permit the modification of a civil protective order in April 2019.
|
| Court | court |
The court issuing the current order, permitting the defendant to provide sealed information to Court-1 and Court-2.
|
| DOJ | government agency |
Appears in the footer as part of the document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00019331'.
|
Timeline (5 events)
2019-02
The Government, ex parte and under seal, sought modification of civil protective orders to permit compliance with criminal grand jury subpoenas.
The Recipient turned over certain materials covered by the protective order to the Government as a result of the modification by Court-1.
Relationships (2)
The document describes interactions between the Government and the Defendant within a criminal matter, including discovery and arguments before the Court.
The Recipient turned over materials to the Government as a result of a court order that the Government sought.
Key Quotes (1)
"there is no impediment to counsel making sealed applications to Court-1 and Court-2, respectively, to unseal the relevant materials."Source
— Government
(A statement from the Government, cited from Dkt. No. 46 at 3 n.5, indicating a procedure for unsealing court materials.)
DOJ-OGR-00019331.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,892 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 620 Filed 09/02/20 Page 4 of 5
3. In February 2019, the Government, ex parte and under seal, sought modification of those civil protective orders so as to permit compliance with the criminal grand jury subpoenas;
4. In April 2019, one court (“Court-1”) permitted the modification and, subsequently, another court (“Court-2”) did not;
5. That as a result of the modification of the civil protective order by Court-1, the Recipient turned over to the Government certain materials that had been covered by the protective order; and
6. That the Defendant learned of this information (sealed by other courts) as a result of Rule 16 discovery in this criminal matter.
With the exception of identifying the relevant judicial decision makers and specific civil matters, all of the information listed above is available in the public record, including in the letter filed on the public docket by the Government on this issue. See Dkt. No. 46. Although this Court remains in the dark as to why this information will be relevant to those courts, so that those courts can make their own determination, to the extent it would otherwise be prohibited by the protective order in this matter, the Court hereby permits the defendant to provide to the relevant courts under seal the above information, including the information identifying the relevant judicial decision makers and civil matters.
In addition, the Government has indicated that “there is no impediment to counsel making sealed applications to Court-1 and Court-2, respectively, to unseal the relevant materials.” Dkt. No. 46 at 3 n.5. In her reply, the Defendant asserts that she is amenable to such a solution if the Court agrees with the Government that doing so would not contravene the protective order in this case. To the extent it would otherwise be prohibited by the protective
4
DOJ-OGR-00019331
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document