DOJ-OGR-00010747.jpg

519 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 519 KB
Summary

This is a court order dated June 24, 2022, from Judge Alison J. Nathan in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The order denies the Defendant's request to redact seven written witness statements, citing the presumption of public access and the fact that the witnesses themselves did not seek to file their statements under seal. The Court directs the Government to docket the statements without redactions and affirms that witnesses Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre may present in-person statements at the future sentencing hearing.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Lugosch
Mentioned as a party in a case citation: 'See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 124 (2d Cir. 2006).'
Annie Farmer Witness/Victim
Named as one of the individuals who may present an in-person statement at sentencing.
Kate Witness/Victim
Named as one of the individuals who may present an in-person statement at sentencing. No last name provided.
Virginia Giuffre Witness/Victim
Named as one of the individuals who may present an in-person statement at sentencing.
ALISON J. NATHAN United States Circuit Judge
The judge who signed and issued the order.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Government Government agency
Referred to as a party in the case, likely the prosecution. Ordered to docket written statements and provide copies o...
Pyramid Co. of Onondaga Company
Mentioned as a party in a case citation: 'See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 124 (2d Cir. 2006).'
The Court Judicial body
Referred to as the entity that received written statements and is making the ruling.

Timeline (3 events)

2022-06-24
Filing of Document 682 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
New York, New York
2022-06-24
The Court denied the Defendant's request for redactions.
ALISON J. NATHAN Defendant
A future sentencing hearing where Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre may present in-person statements.

Locations (1)

Location Context
The location where the document was dated and signed.

Relationships (4)

ALISON J. NATHAN Judicial Defendant
Judge Nathan is presiding over the Defendant's case and denied their request for redactions.
Annie Farmer Adversarial (Victim/Witness vs. Defendant) Defendant
Annie Farmer submitted a written statement in the case against the Defendant and may make an in-person statement at sentencing.
Kate Adversarial (Victim/Witness vs. Defendant) Defendant
Kate may make an in-person statement at the Defendant's sentencing.
Virginia Giuffre Adversarial (Victim/Witness vs. Defendant) Defendant
Virginia Giuffre may make an in-person statement at the Defendant's sentencing.

Key Quotes (3)

"Accordingly, the Defendant’s request for redactions is denied."
Source
— The Court / ALISON J. NATHAN (The final ruling on the Defendant's motion to redact witness statements.)
DOJ-OGR-00010747.jpg
Quote #1
"The Government shall promptly docket the written statements without redactions."
Source
— The Court / ALISON J. NATHAN (An order directed to the Government following the denial of the redaction request.)
DOJ-OGR-00010747.jpg
Quote #2
"Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre may present an in-person statement at sentencing if they wish to do so."
Source
— The Court / ALISON J. NATHAN (Clarifying the rights of specific witnesses/victims at the upcoming sentencing.)
DOJ-OGR-00010747.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,321 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 682 Filed 06/24/22 Page 4 of 4
the Government correctly notes, while these statements do implicate privacy interests that might justify certain redactions, those interests here belong to the witnesses themselves, none of whom has sought to submit her statement under seal. Dkt. No. 673 at 2. It follows that the Defendant fails to present any sufficiently weighty countervailing factors or higher values to override the presumption in favor of public access. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 124 (2d Cir. 2006). Accordingly, the Defendant’s request for redactions is denied.
In sum, all seven written statements received by the Court are deemed part of the record. The Court will consider them only for what they permissibly may be considered. The Government shall promptly docket the written statements without redactions. Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre may present an in-person statement at sentencing if they wish to do so.
The Government shall provide copies of this Order to counsel for the seven individuals who submitted statements by no later than today, June 24, 2022.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 24, 2022
New York, New York
[Signature of Alison J. Nathan]
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States Circuit Judge,
sitting by designation
4
DOJ-OGR-00010747

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document