DOJ-OGR-00001126.jpg

499 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 499 KB
Summary

This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell was not attempting to evade arrest but was following established security protocols in response to what her security guard mistakenly identified as an ambush by the press. It further explains that a cellphone was wrapped in tin foil to prevent press access after a court inadvertently released her number, not to evade law enforcement, citing her continued use of the phone and ownership of another, uncovered primary phone as evidence.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell
Subject of the legal filing, whose actions during her arrest are being explained and defended.
G Max
The name under which Ms. Maxwell's primary phone was subscribed.
Security Guard Security Guard
An unnamed security guard on duty at Ms. Maxwell's house who mistook FBI agents for the press.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
FBI government agency
Mentioned as the agents who approached Ms. Maxwell's house to arrest her.
Second Circuit government agency
A court that inadvertently unsealed records containing Ms. Maxwell's phone number.
Terramar Project, Inc. charity
Identified as Ms. Maxwell's charity, under whose name a cellphone was subscribed.
the government government agency
The opposing party in the legal case, which has characterized Ms. Maxwell as a "master spy".

Timeline (3 events)

2020-05
Ms. Maxwell used the phone subscribed to her charity to make calls in May 2020, shortly before her arrest.
FBI agents arrived at Ms. Maxwell's house. The security guard mistook them for the press and alerted Ms. Maxwell, who moved to a safe room as per security protocol.
the house
An initial bail hearing where the reason for Ms. Maxwell's cellphone being wrapped in tin foil was explained to the Court.
Court
Ms. Maxwell the Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
The location where Ms. Maxwell was when FBI agents arrived, which had a safe room.

Relationships (1)

Ms. Maxwell professional Security Guard
The document states the guard was part of "Ms. Maxwell's security personnel" and radioed her to provide an alert, indicating an employer-employee or client-provider relationship.

Key Quotes (3)

"master spy"
Source
— the government (A characterization of Ms. Maxwell that the document argues is inaccurate.)
DOJ-OGR-00001126.jpg
Quote #1
"Terramar Project, Inc."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001126.jpg
Quote #2
"G Max"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001126.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,007 characters)

Case 20-cr-00330-AJN Document 192 Filed 08/25/20 Page 25 of 45
According to [REDACTED], the security guard on duty that day had seen helicopters flying over the house, which he assumed to be the press. (Id.). When the guard saw the FBI agents walking up the driveway to the house, he again assumed that they were members of the press. (Id.). Accordingly, he radioed Ms. Maxwell to alert her that the press was on the grounds and approaching the house. (Id.). In accordance with the procedure that Ms. Maxwell’s security personnel had put in place for such an event, Ms. Maxwell moved away from the windows and into a safe room inside the house. (Id.). Ms. Maxwell was not trying to avoid arrest; she was simply following the established security protocols to protect herself from what had been informed was an ambush by the press.
Regarding the cellphone wrapped in tin foil, we explained to the Court at the initial bail hearing that Ms. Maxwell took this step to prevent the press from accessing her phone after the Second Circuit inadvertently unsealed certain court records with the phone number unredacted. (Tr. 55-56). Having now reviewed the discovery produced by the government, it is clear that Ms. Maxwell was not at all the “master spy” the government makes her out to be and was not wrapping the phone in order to evade detection by law enforcement.
First, the cellphone in question was subscribed in the name of “Terramar Project, Inc.,” which is easily identifiable through a simple Google search as Ms. Maxwell’s charity. Second, Ms. Maxwell used the phone to make calls as late as May 2020, just before her arrest. She would never have used the phone if she had been concerned that the authorities were using it to track her. Third, Ms. Maxwell had another phone subscribed in the name of “G Max” that she was using as her primary phone, which was not covered. It would make no sense for her to try to wrap one phone in tin foil to avoid detection and not the other.
24
DOJ-OGR-00001126

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document