DOJ-OGR-00001156.jpg

434 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 434 KB
Summary

This legal document, filed on December 18, 2020, is a court motion arguing that victims' accounts against an unnamed defendant are strongly corroborated by both witnesses and documentary evidence. The filing asserts that this evidence will prove the victims interacted with both the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein, particularly when some victims were minors. It also addresses a complaint from the defense's 'Renewed Bail Motion' regarding the sufficiency of the evidence produced.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein
Mentioned as an individual with whom the defendant and victims interacted.
the defendant defendant
The subject of the legal motion, alleged to have interacted with victims alongside Jeffrey Epstein.
victims victim
Individuals whose accounts of interacting with the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein are being corroborated. Some are des...
witnesses witness
Individuals who corroborate the victims' accounts and will confirm the defendant and Epstein interacted with minor vi...

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
Government government agency
Mentioned in the context of 'Government's evidence' which corroborates victims' testimony.

Timeline (3 events)

Victims met and interacted with the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein.
unspecified times and locations
The defendant and Epstein knew and interacted with certain minor victims when those victims were minors.
unspecified
The defense filed a 'Renewed Bail Motion' complaining about the volume of evidence.
the defense

Relationships (3)

the defendant associates Jeffrey Epstein
The document states they both 'knew and interacted with certain minor victims' together and that victims 'met and interacted with both the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein'.
the defendant interaction victims
The document alleges that evidence proves 'these victims in fact met and interacted with... the defendant'.
Jeffrey Epstein interaction victims
The document alleges that evidence proves 'these victims in fact met and interacted with... Jeffrey Epstein'.

Key Quotes (3)

"evidence will make it virtually indisputable that these victims in fact met and interacted with both the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein at the times and locations they describe."
Source
— Author of the document (presumably the prosecution/Government) (Asserting the strength of the documentary evidence against the defendant.)
DOJ-OGR-00001156.jpg
Quote #1
"additional witnesses will confirm that both the defendant and Epstein knew and interacted with certain minor victims when those victims were minors."
Source
— Author of the document (presumably the prosecution/Government) (Describing what further witness testimony will establish.)
DOJ-OGR-00001156.jpg
Quote #2
"the Government’s evidence strongly corroborates the victims’ testimony that they met and interacted with the defendant and Epstein at particular times and in particular places."
Source
— Author of the document (presumably the prosecution/Government) (Summarizing the impact of the government's evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00001156.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,208 characters)

Case 1:19-cr-00330-AJN Document 100-2 Filed 12/18/20 Page 14 of 36
In addition to corroborating each other, these victims’ accounts are further corroborated by other witnesses and by documentary evidence, which has been produced in discovery. That evidence will make it virtually indisputable that these victims in fact met and interacted with both the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein at the times and locations they describe.
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Beyond this documentary evidence, additional witnesses will confirm that both the defendant and Epstein knew and interacted with certain minor victims when those victims were minors. In other words, the Government’s evidence strongly corroborates the victims’ testimony that they met and interacted with the defendant and Epstein at particular times and in particular places.
In the instant motion, the defendant complains that the documentary evidence relevant to the three victims identified in the Indictment and produced to date is not sufficiently voluminous
2 In its Renewed Bail Motion, the defense complains
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
11
DOJ-OGR-00001156

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document