witnesses
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
The jury
|
Professional judicial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
defense lawyers
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Government lawyers
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jury
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. government
|
Protective |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged tampering |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
lawyers (government, defense, personal)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
each party
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Influential |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jurors
|
Evaluation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jurors
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lawyers
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witnesses
|
Collusion alleged |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional testimony |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
UN
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victims
|
Confidants |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Associational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein Victim Compensation Fund
|
Financial |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Cooperation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Experiment | A study was conducted where participants viewed a simulated accident and were questioned about th... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | The trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, where this summation was delivered. | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| N/A | Search warrant execution and evidence collection | Search of Jeffrey Epstein's residence where a notepad, high school transcript, Joy Jelly (sexual ... | Jeffrey Epstein's residence... | View |
| N/A | Hearing | A habeas corpus hearing where the trial court viewed and heard witnesses and their testimonies re... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal event | Witness testimony will provide details regarding specifics of abuse and interactions, focusing on... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interviews | OPR conducted more than 60 interviews of witnesses, including FBI agents, USAO staff, and Departm... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A legal trial during which these instructions are given to the jury. The document outlines the ru... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A legal trial is in progress, during which these instructions are given to the jury. | courtroom | View |
| N/A | Trial | The overall legal proceeding during which information about Ms. Conrad was or was not available. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interaction | Witnesses talked to their family members and saw the media, leading to 'contamination of memory'. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A legal proceeding where testimony is given, evidence is admitted, and rulings are made. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A legal trial is in progress, for which these instructions are being given to the jury. | Court | View |
| N/A | Witness preparation | Witnesses met with government, defense, and their own lawyers to discuss case facts and testimony... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | The Government's investigation during which witnesses were interviewed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A civil case was proceeding against the Defendant (Mr. Epstein). | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury instruction | A judge provides instructions to the jury regarding the evaluation of witness credibility, specif... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Trial | The document discusses preparations and rules for an upcoming trial. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Meetings between witnesses and the government/FBI where the defense alleges manipulation occurred. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal discovery | A period of discovery in a case against Mr. Epstein, involving depositions and interviews with pr... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | The legal proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) for which jurors are being selected. | courtroom | View |
| N/A | Trial | The legal proceeding for which this pre-trial motion's table of contents is prepared. | The Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A trial occurred where testimony supplied legitimate explanations for the Government's delay in i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A legal trial is taking place, during which these instructions are given. | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Grand jury proceedings related to the Epstein and Maxwell case, the transcripts of which are bein... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury instruction | A judge is instructing the jury on the proper method for evaluating witness testimony, including ... | courtroom | View |
EFTA00015003.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 24, 2019, between officials at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), specifically involving the Deputy Chief of the Public Corruption Unit. The emails discuss the progress of the Epstein investigation, detailing a recent trip to Fort Lauderdale where investigators interviewed two witnesses at the BSF (Boies Schiller Flexner) office, while a third witness declined to appear. The correspondence also mentions ongoing negotiations with attorney Robbie Kaplan regarding a potential interview with a high-profile individual (name redacted) who is concerned about their legal 'exposure,' with discussions moving toward an attorney proffer.
DOJ-OGR-00008625.jpg
This document is a specific page (page 87 of 167) from a court filing dated December 18, 2021, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It serves as a Table of Contents for Jury Instructions, listing instructions 49 through 59, covering topics such as the defendant's right not to testify, evidence from searches, electronic communications, and jury conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00008602.jpg
This document is page 64 of 167 from a court filing dated December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains 'Instruction No. 44: Credibility of Witnesses,' which guides the jury on how to evaluate witness testimony based on demeanor, consistency, honesty, and potential interest in the case's outcome. The text outlines the jurors' right to accept or reject testimony in whole or in part based on their assessment of truthfulness.
DOJ-OGR-00008545.jpg
This document is page 7 of a 167-page legal filing (Document 563) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 18, 2021. It is a table of contents for a set of jury instructions, listing topics from Instruction No. 42 to No. 59, which cover evidence, witness credibility, defendant's rights, and jury conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00008530.jpg
This document contains Jury Instruction No. 55 from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 17, 2021. The instruction advises the jury regarding 'Preparation of Witnesses,' clarifying that it is not improper for witnesses to meet with lawyers (Government, defense, or personal) prior to testifying to review subjects and exhibits. The judge instructs that while the jury may consider this preparation when evaluating credibility, the weight given to it is within their discretion.
DOJ-OGR-00008518.jpg
This document is page 62 of a court filing (Document 562) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 17, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 44 regarding the 'Credibility of Witnesses,' advising jurors on how to evaluate testimony based on demeanor, consistency, potential bias, and common sense. The text outlines the jurors' right to accept or reject testimony if they believe a witness has lied or is mistaken.
DOJ-OGR-00008463.jpg
This page contains Jury Instruction No. 2 ('Role of the Jury') filed on December 17, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The text instructs the jury that they are the sole judges of facts and credibility, and clarifies that statements made by lawyers or rulings made by the judge do not constitute evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00008301.jpg
This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 9, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government is requesting permission to redact a letter motion concerning the admission of Government Exhibit 52 and to seal or redact Exhibits A and B to protect the privacy of minor victims, witnesses, and third parties.
DOJ-OGR-00008251.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 8, 2021. In it, a speaker, presumably the judge, details the procedure for voir dire, explaining how a list of witnesses and entities will be presented to prospective jurors. The judge outlines special measures for witnesses testifying under pseudonyms, including discussing them at sidebar and preventing a specific employer's name from being mentioned in open court to protect a witness's identity.
DOJ-OGR-00001695.jpg
This is page 6 of a court filing (Document 36) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 30, 2020. The document outlines protocols for handling 'Confidential Information' during discovery, specifically regarding the protection of PII for victims and witnesses, while noting that victims who have publicly identified themselves on the record are exempt from this confidentiality. It also establishes the procedure for Defense Counsel to challenge confidentiality designations made by the Government.
DOJ-OGR-00001694.jpg
This document is Page 5 of a Protective Order filed on July 30, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines strict protocols prohibiting the Defense team and potential witnesses from publicly disclosing the identities of victims or witnesses found in discovery materials, mandating that such references in court filings be made under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00001684.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, is the second page of a declaration by Assistant U.S. Attorney Alex Rossmiller. It outlines a disagreement between the U.S. Government and the defense regarding proposed restrictions on the public identification of victims and witnesses in the case. The document specifies the conflicting paragraphs in the proposed orders from both sides and references an accompanying letter for the Government's full reasoning.
DOJ-OGR-00001676.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, defines what constitutes "Confidential Information" provided by the Government during discovery. It specifies that materials containing personal information of victims and witnesses are to be marked confidential, but also establishes a procedure for Defense Counsel to challenge this designation if they disagree, potentially leading to a motion to de-designate the materials.
DOJ-OGR-00001675.jpg
This document is page 5 of a court order (Document 33-1) from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on July 28, 2020. The order restricts the defense team and other authorized persons from publicly disclosing or filing the identities of victims and witnesses found in discovery materials. Such information must be filed under seal unless specific written authorization is granted by the Government or the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00001653.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated July 27, 2020. It outlines protocols for handling 'Confidential Information' during the discovery process, specifically defining what constitutes confidential material and how personal identification of victims and witnesses must be protected. It also notes that victims or witnesses who have publicly identified themselves are not subject to these specific confidentiality restrictions.
DOJ-OGR-00001382.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the U.S. Government's description of inmate Ms. Maxwell's prison conditions is false. It counters claims of amenities by detailing harsh realities such as sleep deprivation from guards' actions, solitary confinement, unsanitary conditions, and inadequate resources for trial preparation. The filing asserts the government's information is based on unreliable, multi-layered hearsay from prison staff to the prosecutor.
DOJ-OGR-00001156.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 18, 2020, is a court motion arguing that victims' accounts against an unnamed defendant are strongly corroborated by both witnesses and documentary evidence. The filing asserts that this evidence will prove the victims interacted with both the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein, particularly when some victims were minors. It also addresses a complaint from the defense's 'Renewed Bail Motion' regarding the sufficiency of the evidence produced.
DOJ-OGR-00001155.jpg
This legal document discusses the corroboration of victims' accounts against a defendant involved in Epstein's criminal scheme to sexually abuse minors. It addresses the defense's arguments regarding the sufficiency of evidence and witness testimony, asserting that multiple victims will provide consistent testimony about the defendant's role in grooming and enticing minor girls. The document also notes that the defendant has abandoned certain legal challenges related to bail after receiving discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00000599.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) dated July 25, 2019. It defines "Confidential Information," which can include personal data and witness identities, and sets forth strict rules for how this information must be handled by the defendant and their Defense Counsel. The rules govern the use, storage, review, and disclosure of the sensitive material throughout the legal proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00000522.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019. A prosecutor is arguing to a judge that the defendant should be detained, citing evidence of witness tampering through payments to associates, and highlighting that the defendant is an 'extraordinary flight risk' due to his immense wealth (over $500 million), six homes, two private islands, and a residence in France.
DOJ-OGR-00000498.jpg
This document is a page from a court order filed on July 18, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The Court rules that Epstein presents a serious flight risk and a danger to the community, citing his alleged sex crimes with minors and witness tampering. The document references a statement by attorney David Boies regarding Epstein's history of contacting cooperating witnesses to stop their cooperation, and cites legal precedents (including a 2001 case also named United States v. Epstein) to justify denying release.
DOJ-OGR-00000412.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 16, 2019, in which a government prosecutor argues for the pretrial detention of a defendant charged with sex trafficking. The prosecutor emphasizes the seriousness of the alleged crimes, which involve years of sexual abuse of dozens of minors in multiple locations. The argument is supported by claims of strong evidence, including credible and corroborated information from victims, witnesses, and a recent search of the defendant's Manhattan mansion.
DOJ-OGR-00016169.jpg
This document is a partial transcript of an opening statement delivered by Ms. Sternheim on August 10, 2022, in a case against Ms. Maxwell. Ms. Sternheim argues that the government is mischaracterizing lawful conduct as 'grooming' and highlights that witnesses testifying for the government have received substantial payments from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, suggesting a potential motive for their testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00016131.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, in which a judge is instructing the jury on their conduct. The judge strictly prohibits jurors from discussing the case with anyone, including each other, until deliberations, and forbids the use of any electronic devices or social media for communication or research related to the case. The instructions emphasize the need to keep an open mind and base their verdict solely on the evidence presented in court.
DOJ-OGR-00016130.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. The text contains instructions from the judge to the jury regarding how to evaluate witness testimony and the importance of keeping an open mind until all evidence is presented. Notably, the judge addresses the significant media attention surrounding the case and establishes that witnesses may use pseudonyms or first names only to protect their privacy.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Epstein Victim Co... | witnesses | $0.00 | Witnesses receiving 'a lot of money' for claims... | View |
Responses to solicitation
Responses received by Edwards from the solicitation letters.
Epstein investigation
More than 60 interviews conducted with FBI case agents, their supervisors, FBI administrative personnel, current and former USAO staff/attorneys, current and former Department attorneys/senior managers, and former State Attorney/Assistant State Attorney.
Statements from witnesses interviewed during the investig...
The Government produced statements for all witnesses interviewed during the investigation and notes that Giglio material may exist in notes of witness statements.
Testimony regarding Maxwell's conduct
Descriptions of the 'playbook', grooming, and specific incidents of abuse.
Preparation of Witnesses
Discussion of facts of the case and testimony prior to court appearance.
Cross-examination
Defense questioning witnesses about inconsistencies in their stories regarding Ghislaine Maxwell.
Witness Conduct
Instructions that witnesses should not talk to other witnesses and their memory should be their own.
Witness interviews
Meetings between the government/FBI and witnesses where defense alleged manipulation occurred.
Unknown
Contact resulting in witnesses stopping cooperation in a civil case.
N/A
Defense claims Epstein did not use internet, email, chatrooms, or phone to induce witnesses.
Experiences with the defendant and Epstein
Prior consistent statements about abuse, made well over a decade ago.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity