DOJ-OGR-00009128.jpg

705 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 705 KB
Summary

This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, details the voir dire process for 'Juror 50'. It outlines his responses to a questionnaire, confirming he has no biases regarding sex crimes, has not been a victim of such crimes, and can assess witness credibility impartially. The document also recounts his statements from November 16, 2021, where he affirmed his ability to remain impartial despite hearing in the media that Jeffrey Epstein had a girlfriend, and his commitment to deciding the case based only on the evidence presented in court.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Juror 50 Prospective Juror
The subject of the document, detailing his responses in a questionnaire and during voir dire for a court case.
Jeffrey Epstein
Mentioned by Juror 50 as someone he heard about in the media, specifically that Epstein had a girlfriend when he died.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
Court government agency
Mentioned as the body providing instructions to the jury and questioning prospective jurors.

Timeline (1 events)

2021-11-16
Voir dire of Juror 50, where he was questioned by the Court about his ability to be impartial.
court
Juror 50 the Court

Relationships (1)

Jeffrey Epstein personal an unnamed girlfriend
Juror 50 stated he 'heard when Jeffrey Epstein had died that he had a girlfriend'.

Key Quotes (3)

"presumed innocent of all charges unless and until the government proves her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."
Source
— The Court (instruction to Juror 50) (An instruction from the Court that Juror 50 confirmed he was able to follow during voir dire.)
DOJ-OGR-00009128.jpg
Quote #1
"heard when Jeffrey Epstein had died that he had a girlfriend,"
Source
— Juror 50 (Juror 50's explanation to the Court regarding his knowledge of the defendant from the media.)
DOJ-OGR-00009128.jpg
Quote #2
"[a]bsolutely"
Source
— Juror 50 (Juror 50's response when reaffirming his ability to put aside media reports and decide the case based on evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00009128.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,100 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 615 Filed 02/24/22 Page 9 of 49
Juror 50 indicated that there was nothing about the nature of the case and the accusations as summarized in the questionnaire that might make it difficult for him to be fair and impartial. See Def. Ex. 1, Question 42. He also wrote that he did not have any views about laws concerning the age of consent or laws governing sex trafficking and sex crimes against minors that would affect his ability to be fair and impartial. See Def. Ex. 1, Questions 43-44. Juror 50 answered that he would not have any difficulty assessing the credibility of a witness claiming sexual assault or abuse just like he would any other witness. See Def. Ex. 1, Question 47. Juror 50 checked the “no” box in response to the question of whether he or a friend or family member had ever been the victim of sexual harassment, sexual abuse, or sexual assault, including actual or attempted sexual assault or other unwanted sexual advance, including by a stranger, acquaintance, supervisor, teacher, or family member. See Def. Ex. 1, Question 48. He also checked the “no” box in response to the question of whether he or any of his relatives or close friends had ever been a victim of a crime. See Def. Ex. 1, Question 25.
Juror 50 was one of the 231 prospective jurors that the parties agreed should proceed to voir dire. During voir dire, Juror 50 confirmed that he was able to follow the Court’s instruction that the defendant is “presumed innocent of all charges unless and until the government proves her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” Nov. 16, 2021 Tr. at 128:15-19. In response to questioning by the Court about his knowledge of the defendant from the media, Juror 50 explained that he “heard when Jeffrey Epstein had died that he had a girlfriend,” and reaffirmed that he was “[a]bsolutely” able to put aside anything that he read or heard about the defendant and decide the case based on the facts and evidence, or lack of evidence, presented in court, and follow the Court’s instructions as to the law. Id. at 130:3-18; see also id. at 130:19-131:7.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document