DOJ-OGR-00001178.jpg
350 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
350 KB
Summary
This legal document is the conclusion of a filing by the U.S. Attorney's office, dated December 16, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The prosecution argues that the defendant's 'Renewed Bail Motion' should be denied, referencing a prior court finding that the defendant “poses a substantial actual risk of flight.” The document asserts that no new information justifies changing this conclusion.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| AUDREY STRAUSS | Acting United States Attorney |
Listed as the Acting United States Attorney submitting the document.
|
| Maurene Comey | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed as one of the Assistant United States Attorneys on the submission.
|
| Alison Moe | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed as one of the Assistant United States Attorneys on the submission.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed as one of the Assistant United States Attorneys on the submission.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Office of the United States Attorney | government agency |
The entity submitting the legal document, represented by Audrey Strauss and her assistants.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-12-16
The U.S. Attorney's office filed a document arguing that a defendant's 'Renewed Bail Motion' should be denied.
New York, New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location where the document was dated.
|
Relationships (3)
Maurene Comey is listed as an Assistant United States Attorney under the authority of Audrey Strauss, the Acting United States Attorney.
Alison Moe is listed as an Assistant United States Attorney under the authority of Audrey Strauss, the Acting United States Attorney.
Lara Pomerantz is listed as an Assistant United States Attorney under the authority of Audrey Strauss, the Acting United States Attorney.
Key Quotes (1)
"poses a substantial actual risk of flight."Source
— The Court
(A previous finding by the Court regarding the defendant, cited in this document as a reason to deny bail.)
DOJ-OGR-00001178.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (664 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 1002 Filed 12/16/20 Page 36 of 36
CONCLUSION
As this Court previously found, the defendant “poses a substantial actual risk of flight.” (Tr. 86). Nothing in the defense submission justifies altering the Court’s prior conclusion that there are no conditions of bail that would assure the defendant’s presence in court proceedings in this case. Accordingly, the Renewed Bail Motion should be denied.
Dated: New York, New York
December 16, 2020
December 16, 2020
Respectfully submitted,
AUDREY STRAUSS
Acting United States Attorney
Acting United States Attorney
By:
Maurene Comey
Alison Moe
Lara Pomerantz
Assistant United States Attorneys
(212) 637-2324
Maurene Comey
Alison Moe
Lara Pomerantz
Assistant United States Attorneys
(212) 637-2324
33
DOJ-OGR-00001178
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document