Alison Moe
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Co counsel prosecution |
15
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
11
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
location
USA
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Geoffrey S. Berman
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Subordinate superior |
7
|
3 | |
|
location
USA
|
Employment representation |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Appellant's counsel (filer)
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Submission of legal filing concluding that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-26 | Court filing | The Government submitted a motion filed by Kate's attorney. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Sentencing Submission filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal filing | The U.S. Government filed its sentencing memorandum in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Filing of Government's sentencing recommendation conclusion. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal document service | Christian R. Everdell served a memorandum via ECF upon four individuals. | N/A | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 661 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 660 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | Legal filing | Document 650 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 652 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-15 | N/A | Filing of Government's opposition to defendant's motion for a new trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-03-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 635 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-25 | N/A | Filing of Government's response to defendant's post-trial motions | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 617 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-16 | Court filing | Document 603 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
21-770_Documents%20Pt%202%20of%203.pdf
This document is a compilation of legal filings from late 2020 to early 2021 concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's repeated attempts to secure release on bail pending her trial for sex trafficking conspiracy. It includes the Government's opposition detailing her flight risk, wealth, and foreign ties (specifically to France and the UK), a victim statement from Annie Farmer, correspondence from the French Ministry of Justice confirming they do not extradite nationals, and Judge Nathan's orders denying bail. The documents highlight Maxwell's offer to renounce her foreign citizenships and pledge significant assets, all of which the Court found insufficient to assure her appearance.
21-58_Documents%20Pt%203%20of%204.pdf
This document is the Government's Memorandum in Opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's Renewed Motion for Release on bail, filed on April 1, 2021. It argues against her release, citing a previous court finding from July 2020 that she posed a serious flight risk and that no bail conditions could ensure her appearance, a conclusion the Government maintains is still valid due to the seriousness of the offense, strong evidence, and her extensive financial resources and foreign ties.
052.pdf
This document is a 'Nolle Prosequi' filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, formally dismissing the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein due to his death on August 10, 2019. The order cites the rule of abatement as the legal basis for dismissal since Epstein died before a final judgment was issued. Judge Richard M. Berman signed the order on August 29, 2019, adding a handwritten note incorporating the transcript of an August 27 hearing and emphasizing the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
047.pdf
Formal letter from U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman to Judge Richard Berman dated August 19, 2019, confirming Jeffrey Epstein's death by suicide while in custody on August 10, 2019. The letter requests the court approve an order of nolle prosequi to dismiss the indictment due to the defendant's death and reaffirms the office's commitment to the victims.
047-01.pdf
This document is a Nolle Prosequi filed on August 19, 2019, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, formally dismissing the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein. The dismissal cites the rule of abatement following Epstein's death on August 10, 2019, which occurred while the case was pending trial on charges of sex trafficking and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors. The document is signed by Assistant U.S. Attorneys and U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman.
046.pdf
A letter dated August 12, 2019, from MCC Warden Lamine N'Diaye to Judge Richard Berman regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The Warden confirms that ongoing FBI and OIG investigations will cover a specific incident involving Epstein that occurred at the MCC on or about July 23, 2019. Due to these active investigations, the Warden declines to divulge information about a completed internal investigation regarding that same incident.
045.pdf
A letter from U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman to Warden Lamine N'Diaye dated August 12, 2019, acknowledging the death of Jeffrey Epstein. The Judge specifically inquires whether ongoing investigations will address the prior incident at the MCC involving Epstein on July 23, 2019, noting that the Bureau of Prisons' conclusions regarding that event have never been definitively explained.
044.pdf
This document is an official letter dated August 10, 2019, from Warden Lamine N'Diaye of the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) to Judges McMahon and Berman. The letter formally notifies the court of Jeffrey Epstein's death at 7:37 a.m. that morning, following an apparent suicide in his cell at 6:30 a.m. It mentions that both the FBI and the Office of the Inspector General are investigating the incident.
038.pdf
This document is a Protective Order filed on July 25, 2019, in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 Cr. 490). The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, establishes strict protocols for handling discovery materials to protect the privacy of victims and uncharged individuals, specifically categorizing some materials as 'Confidential' or 'Highly Confidential' (including nude images). It prohibits the defendant and defense counsel from disseminating these materials to the public or posting them on the internet, and mandates that 'Highly Confidential' materials be reviewed by the defendant only in the presence of counsel.
030.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Richard Berman regarding the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The Government refutes the defense's claim that Epstein's Austrian passport was never used, stating it contains stamps showing travel to France, Spain, the UK, and Saudi Arabia in the 1980s. The prosecution also notes concerns that Epstein has not disclosed how he obtained the passport or if he holds foreign citizenship.
023.pdf
This July 16, 2019 letter from the DOJ to Judge Berman provides supplemental information for Jeffrey Epstein's detention hearing. It details suspicious wire transfers totaling $350,000 to two potential co-conspirators shortly after the release of Miami Herald articles in late 2018. The letter also reveals the seizure of a foreign passport with Epstein's photo but a false name, as well as over $70,000 in cash and 48 loose diamonds found in his Manhattan safe, arguing these facts support a serious risk of flight.
011.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Richard Berman arguing for the pretrial detention of Jeffrey Epstein. The Government outlines Epstein's extreme flight risk due to his wealth (over $500 million), international ties (Paris, US Virgin Islands), and access to private aircraft (noting over 20 international flights since 2018). It also details the danger he poses to the community, citing the recent discovery of lewd photos of minors in his home and a history of witness intimidation, including specific wire transfers made to potential witnesses following negative press coverage in late 2018.
010.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Richard Berman requesting an extension of time to respond to Jeffrey Epstein's Bail Motion, citing a lack of financial disclosure from the defense. Judge Berman denied the request via a handwritten note on the document, stating it was 'Hard to imagine it would take the Govt extra time to review submission.'
20250117133905126_22-1426.pdf
This document is a formal legal opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the conviction and 240-month prison sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell for sex trafficking and related offenses. The court rejected Maxwell's appeal on five grounds, including arguments regarding a non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, juror misconduct, jury instructions, and sentencing reasonableness. The document also includes a subsequent order from November 2024 denying Maxwell's petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc.
EFTA00038817.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 28, 2020, between Jill Greenfield, a partner at the law firm Fieldfisher, and a redacted Detective from the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force. Greenfield represents a client who is a victim of sexual assault that occurred in the UK and asserts the client's right to anonymity under UK law while arranging a potential interview. The Detective copies FBI agent Amanda Young and SDNY prosecutors Alison Moe and Alexander Rossmiller on the correspondence.
EFTA00038803.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 28 to February 1, 2020, between Jill Greenfield (Partner at Fieldfisher in London) and a redacted Detective from the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force. Greenfield is representing a client who is a victim of sexual assault in the UK and is asserting her client's right to anonymity under UK statute while coordinating a potential interview with US authorities. The thread includes FBI agent Amanda N. Young and USANYS prosecutor Alison Moe in the correspondence to schedule a call regarding the Epstein investigation.
EFTA00037711.pdf
This document contains an email chain from August 2019 between the US Attorney's Office (likely SDNY) and Amazon regarding overdue and incomplete compliance with a Grand Jury Subpoena (Ref. No. CRIM1031692 2019 DS). The prosecutors, including Alison Moe, demand the production of unredacted materials and records for nine specific email addresses, noting that Amazon only provided data for two and redacted over 300 descriptions. The correspondence threatens contempt proceedings if Amazon does not promptly resolve the non-compliance.
EFTA00032021.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated September 15, 2021. It serves as notice that the government intends to call FBI Computer Forensic Examiner Stephen [Redacted] as an expert witness to testify regarding the extraction of data from seized electronic devices. The letter also reiterates previous government requests from 2020 and early 2021 for reciprocal discovery and expert witness notices from the defense.
EFTA00029535.pdf
This document contains an email thread between the US Attorney's Office and defense counsel regarding the case USA v. Maxwell on June 30, 2021. The correspondence follows a court order (Docket 305) requiring the parties to submit proposed redactions to the court's opinion on suppression motions. Defense attorney Christian Everdell confirms they have no redactions, and prosecutor Lara Pomerantz agrees to file a joint letter conveying this to the court.
EFTA00026772.pdf
This document is a Protective Order filed on July 25, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. It establishes strict protocols for the handling of discovery materials, distinguishing between 'Confidential Information' (identifying information of witnesses/victims) and 'Highly Confidential Information' (specifically images of nude or partially-nude individuals). The order mandates that the defendant (Epstein) may only review materials in the presence of counsel, cannot possess copies, and prohibits the dissemination of these materials to the public or internet.
EFTA00026750.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues for the entry of its proposed protective order regarding discovery materials, specifically opposing the defendant's request to publicly name victims who have previously spoken to the media and opposing restrictions on the Government's use of its own investigative materials. The document includes the full text of the proposed protective order, detailing how 'Confidential' and 'Highly Confidential' information (including sexualized imagery) must be handled by the defense.
EFTA00010422.pdf
This document is a formal letter and proposed legal order from U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman to Judge Richard M. Berman dated August 19, 2019. It requests the dismissal (nolle prosequi) of the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein following his death by suicide in custody on August 10, 2019, citing the legal rule of abatement. The document also affirms the Government's commitment to continuing support for the victims despite the dismissal of the specific case against Epstein.
EFTA00010410.pdf
This document contains an email chain between defense attorney Christian Everdell and US Attorney's Office prosecutors (Lara Pomerantz, Maurene Comey, et al.) dated June 30, 2021, regarding the case USA v. Maxwell. The correspondence confirms that the defense has no redactions to propose regarding a court opinion and coordinates the filing of a joint letter to the court. The document also includes the official Notice of Electronic Filing (Order 305) from Judge Alison J. Nathan, which set the deadlines for these redaction proposals.
DOJ-OGR-00000065.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal opinion affirming the District Court's June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction for 'Maxwell' (presumably Ghislaine Maxwell). It addresses five appellate questions, including whether Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement barred Maxwell's prosecution and if her sentence was procedurally reasonable. The document also lists the attorneys involved for both the Appellee (United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York) and the Defendant-Appellant.
DOJ-OGR-00018362.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It details a stipulation agreed upon by the prosecution and defense regarding the testimony of Sergeant Michael Dawson to avoid recalling him to the stand. Defense attorney Christian Everdell reads the stipulation into the record, which concerns a cardboard box (Government Exhibit 294) recovered during a search.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
No preview available
Requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense co...
Request for extension of time.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
Requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense counsel's letter.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
Request for extension until 5 p.m. the following day.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity