EFTA00027163.pdf

85.2 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order
File Size: 85.2 KB
Summary

This is a court order dated April 21, 2021, from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a joint letter from the Defendant and law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (BSF) regarding proposed redactions to filings concerning a Rule 17(c) subpoena. The court orders the parties to confer by April 22 and sets a deadline of April 23 for the Government to justify any redaction requests or for the letter to be filed publicly.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Defendant in the case United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
Alison J. Nathan District Judge
Judge presiding over the case who signed the order.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States District Court Southern District of New York
The court where the case is being heard.
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
Referred to as 'BSF'; involved in a joint letter with the Defendant regarding objections to a subpoena.
United States of America
Prosecuting party in the case.

Timeline (2 events)

2021-04-22
Deadline for Defendant and BSF to confer with the Government regarding redactions.
N/A
Defendant Boies Schiller Flexner LLP Government
2021-04-23
Deadline for Government to submit redaction requests or for Defendant to file the letter on public docket.
Public Docket
Government Defendant

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location where the order was signed.
Jurisdiction of the court.

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Legal Interaction Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
Submitted a joint letter together on April 19, 2021; engaging in dispute/discussion over Rule 17(c) subpoena.

Key Quotes (2)

"The Government shall justify any proposed redactions by reference to the test articulated in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006)."
Source
EFTA00027163.pdf
Quote #1
"In light of this, by April 22, 2021, the Defendant and BSF are hereby ORDERED to confer with the Government regarding whether the Government requests redaction of any information contained in the Defendant’s response to BSF’s objections to the Defendant’s proposed Rule 17(c) subpoena..."
Source
EFTA00027163.pdf
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,674 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 226 Filed 04/21/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
United States of America,
—v—
Ghislaine Maxwell,
Defendant.
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 4/21/21
20-CR-330 (AJN)
ORDER
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:
The Court is in receipt of the Defendant’s and Boies Schiller Flexner LLP’s April 19,
2021 joint letter responding to the Court’s April 19, 2021 Order, Dkt. No. 215. The letter
proposes limited redactions on the basis that some of the information is covered by the terms of
the protective order in this case.
In light of this, by April 22, 2021, the Defendant and BSF are hereby ORDERED to
confer with the Government regarding whether the Government requests redaction of any
information contained in the Defendant’s response to BSF’s objections to the Defendant’s
proposed Rule 17(c) subpoena, BSF’s reply, and the April 19, 2021 joint letter addressing the
redactions to these documents.
The Government may submit any redaction requests by April 23, 2021; in doing so, the
Government shall justify any proposed redactions by reference to the test articulated in Lugosch
v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006).
The Defendant, BSF, and the Government are further ORDERED to notify the Court
whether any party seeks redactions to the April 19, 2021 joint letter. If not, the Defendant shall
file the letter on the public docket by April 23, 2021.
SO ORDERED.
EFTA00027163
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 226 Filed 04/21/21 Page 2 of 2
Dated: April 21, 2021
New York, New York
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States District Judge
EFTA00027164

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document