BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
David Boies, II
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-1
|
Non existent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-3
|
Non existent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defendant's Counsel
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-2
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-08 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 1-2 in Case 22-1426, which identifies the parties and their legal representation. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Attorney David Boies filed a Notice of Appearance in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan ordered that redactions on a March 26 letter from Boies Schiller Flexner L... | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order stating there is no reason to maintain redactions on a let... | SDNY | View |
| 2021-03-25 | Meeting | BSF met and conferred with the Defendant's counsel regarding redactions. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-24 | Court order | The Court ordered BSF to file its March 22, 2021, letter on the public docket with proposed redac... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-03-22 | Legal filing | BSF was to file a letter containing objections to the Defendant's proposed Rule 17(c) subpoena. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-03-12 | Legal filing | The Court issued a Sealed and Ex Parte Order requiring BSF to file a letter regarding a subpoena ... | United States District Cour... | View |
21-770_Documents%20Pt%202%20of%203.pdf
This document is a compilation of legal filings from late 2020 to early 2021 concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's repeated attempts to secure release on bail pending her trial for sex trafficking conspiracy. It includes the Government's opposition detailing her flight risk, wealth, and foreign ties (specifically to France and the UK), a victim statement from Annie Farmer, correspondence from the French Ministry of Justice confirming they do not extradite nationals, and Judge Nathan's orders denying bail. The documents highlight Maxwell's offer to renounce her foreign citizenships and pledge significant assets, all of which the Court found insufficient to assure her appearance.
20-3061_Documents.pdf
This document is the complete appellate record for case 20-3061, an interlocutory appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell against the United States. Maxwell appealed a District Court order denying her motion to modify a protective order, seeking permission to share confidential criminal discovery materials under seal with the judge in a related civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) to challenge the government's acquisition of evidence. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, ruling that the protective order decision was not a final judgment or an appealable collateral order, and denied Maxwell's motion to consolidate the criminal appeal with the civil appeal.
2021.03.29%20Response%20-%20Response.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) on March 29, 2021, opposing the US Virgin Islands Government's appeal regarding their failed motion to intervene in probate proceedings. The executors argue the Government's petition is untimely as the original motion was denied over a year prior, and that the Government's emergency motion regarding estate assets is moot because the estate has replenished the Victims' Compensation Program funds. Attached exhibits include the original 2020 opposition brief and a March 2021 press release confirming the sale of Epstein's NYC and Palm Beach properties to fund the compensation program.
063.pdf
A Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed on October 15, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff Teresa Helm agrees to dismiss her lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate with prejudice after accepting an offer from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The document serves to formally close the case.
059.pdf
This document is a joint status report filed on August 14, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The attorneys for both parties inform Judge Debra Freeman that the plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program and is awaiting a determination. Consequently, both parties request a 45-day extension to the current stay of discovery to preserve resources while the compensation claim is processed.
045.pdf
This document is a Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order filed on May 21, 2020, in the US District Court (SDNY) for the case Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein). It establishes legal protocols for designating, handling, and protecting confidential discovery materials, including medical records, financial information, and the names of alleged minor victims. The order binds the parties, their attorneys, and third parties to specific non-disclosure requirements.
044.pdf
This document is a legal filing from May 2020 in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a letter from the Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Estate Executors are obstructing discovery by limiting it to a narrow time window in 2002 and refusing to answer questions fully. The attached Exhibit A contains the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, in which they identify specific staff members (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and Lesley Groff) who worked at Epstein's New York home during late 2002, list various email accounts and phone numbers associated with Epstein, and identify Shoppers Travel, Inc. as his travel agency. No specific flight logs or aircraft manifests are included in the document.
042.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated May 11, 2020, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley (representing Plaintiff Teresa Helm) to Judge Debra Freeman. The letter requests a court conference to address the Defendants' (Indyke and Kahn, executors of the Epstein estate) alleged failure to participate in discovery, specifically their refusal to produce documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking conspiracy and to answer interrogatories regarding email accounts used by Epstein. McCawley argues that the Defendants are engaging in obstructionist delay tactics.
037.pdf
This document is a letter from Sigrid S. McCawley, representing Plaintiff Teresa Helm, to Judge Debra Freeman, requesting a pre-motion conference to compel Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Epstein's lawyer and accountant) to produce discovery documents and respond to interrogatories. The letter details Defendants' failure to comply with discovery obligations, including not producing any documents and improperly limiting the relevant time period for discovery, despite allegations that Jeffrey Epstein operated a decades-long sex-trafficking scheme and sexually assaulted the Plaintiff in 2002.
030.pdf
This document is a letter dated March 20, 2020, from attorney Joshua I. Schiller of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Paul G. Gardephe. It requests oral argument regarding the Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint in the case of Helm v. Indyke et al. The letter argues that the Plaintiff's claims are timely under New York law and doctrines of equitable estoppel/tolling, contrary to the Defendants' assertions.
023.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Change of Address' filed on March 9, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case Teresa Helm v. Indyke, et al. (Case No. 19-cv-10476-PGG). Attorney Sabina Mariella notifies the court and parties that she has moved from the law firm Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and will continue as counsel of record on the case.
021.pdf
A Notice of Appearance filed on March 6, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Andrew Villacastin of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP enters his appearance as counsel for Plaintiff Teresa Helm in her lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate.
013.pdf
Legal correspondence from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Gardephe regarding the case Helm v. Indyke et al. The letter argues against the Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss, asserting that Plaintiff Teresa Helm's claims are timely under NY CPLR § 215(8)(a) due to the recent termination of Epstein's criminal case (August 2019) and the doctrine of equitable estoppel based on Epstein's intimidation and manipulation tactics. The letter also argues that challenges to punitive damages are premature at this stage of litigation.
008.pdf
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated November 25, 2019. It grants the motion for attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to appear Pro Hac Vice as counsel for plaintiff Teresa Helm in her case against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The order is signed by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman.
005.pdf
A Notice of Appearance filed on November 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney David Boies of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP formally enters the case to represent plaintiff Teresa Helm in her lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.
004.pdf
This document is a civil summons issued on November 13, 2019, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein). The summons notifies the defendants that a lawsuit has been filed against them and instructs them to respond within 21 days. The second page contains a blank Proof of Service form.
003.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed on November 12, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-10476). The plaintiff, Teresa Helm, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The summons directs the defendants to serve an answer to the complaint on the plaintiff's attorney, Joshua Schiller of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, within 21 days.
002.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet filed on November 11, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for a lawsuit brought by Teresa Helm against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The defendants named are Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of Epstein's estate. The nature of the suit is classified as 'Other Personal Injury' under Torts, and the plaintiff demands a jury trial.
001.pdf
This document is a legal complaint filed by Teresa Helm against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, alleging sexual abuse and trafficking by Epstein and his co-conspirators. The complaint details Epstein's extensive sex trafficking network, previous legal proceedings, and his personal statements regarding his actions, seeking damages for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
033.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed on April 1, 2021, in the case of Maria Farmer v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The legal action was dismissed with prejudice following Maria Farmer's acceptance of an offer of compensation from the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. The order was signed by U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald.
032.pdf
A legal stipulation filed on April 1, 2021, in the Southern District of New York, dismissing Maria Farmer's lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn). The dismissal is with prejudice and results from Farmer accepting an offer of compensation from the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program.
029.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation and Order filed in April 2020 in the Southern District of New York, staying the lawsuit brought by Maria Farmer against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The stay was agreed upon to allow Farmer to participate in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, a non-adversarial alternative for resolving sexual abuse claims. The order was signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald.
028.pdf
A legal stipulation filed on April 9, 2020, in the Southern District of New York, wherein Plaintiff Maria Farmer and the Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) agreed to stay the lawsuit. The stay was requested to allow Farmer to participate in the 'Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program,' a non-adversarial alternative for resolving sexual abuse claims against the estate.
022.pdf
This is an amended complaint filed by Maria Farmer against the executors of Jeffrey Edward Epstein's estate. Farmer alleges that Epstein sexually assaulted and trafficked her, and that his actions were part of a larger sex trafficking network. The complaint details Epstein's history of sexual abuse, his lenient 2008 plea deal, and the intimidation tactics used to silence victims.
021.pdf
This document is a Notice of Change of Address filed on March 9, 2020, in the case of Maria Farmer v. Indyke, et al. (Case No. 19-cv-10474-NRB) in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Sabina Mariella notifies the court that she has moved from Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and will continue to serve as counsel of record in the case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity