DOJ-OGR-00021741.jpg

735 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 735 KB
Summary

This is an Oral Argument Statement filed on June 30, 2023, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). Filed by attorney Maurene Comey on behalf of the United States (the Appellee), the document indicates a conditional request for oral argument, contingent on another party also requesting it. The form also lists several dates in late 2023 on which Ms. Comey is unavailable to appear in court.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell
Named as a party in the case title: "United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell".
Maurene Comey Attorney
Listed as the person who will argue for the party, and as the filer of the document.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Government Agency
The court in which this document was filed.
United States of America Government
Named as a party in the case, specifically the Appellee, on whose behalf this form is filed.

Timeline (1 events)

2023-06-30
Filing of an Oral Argument Statement in case 22-1426, indicating a conditional desire for oral argument.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

Relationships (2)

Maurene Comey filed the Oral Argument Statement on behalf of the United States of America and is listed as the person who will argue for them, indicating she is their legal counsel in this matter.
Ghislaine Maxwell Adversarial (Legal) United States of America
They are opposing parties in the legal case titled "United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell".

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,154 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 80, 06/30/2023, 3536537, Page1 of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT (Local Rule 34.1(a))
TO REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT, FILL OUT THIS FORM AND FILE IT WITH THE CLERK WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF THE LAST APPELLEE BRIEF.
IF THIS FORM IS NOT TIMELY FILED, YOU WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO ARGUE IN PERSON.
Short Title of Case: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Docket No.: 22-1426
Name of Party: United States of America
Status of Party (e.g., appellant, cross-appellee, etc.): Appellee
Check one of the three options below:
[ ] I want oral argument.
[✓] I want oral argument only if at least one other party does.
[ ] I do not want oral argument.
An attorney whose preference depends on whether other attorneys will argue should consider conferring before requesting argument. After the appeal has been scheduled for oral argument, a motion by counsel to forgo oral argument, even on consent, may be denied.
If no party wants oral argument, the case will be decided on the basis of the written briefs. If you want oral argument, you must appear in Court on the date set by the Court for oral argument.
The Court may determine to decide a case without oral argument even if the parties request it.
If you want oral argument, state the name of the person who will argue:
Name: Maurene Comey
(An attorney must be admitted to practice before the Court in accordance with Local Rule 46.1.)
If you want oral argument, list any dates (including religious holidays), that fall in the interval from 6 to 20 weeks after the due date of this form, that the person who will argue is not available to appear in Court:
September 1, 2023; September 5, 2023; September 8, 2023; September 26, 2023; October 3, 2023;
October 31, 2023; November 7, 2023
ANYONE WHO WANTS TO ARGUE MUST UPDATE THE COURT IN WRITING OF ANY CHANGE IN AVAILABILITY. THE COURT MAY CONSIDER A FAILURE TO UPDATE ABOUT AVAILABILITY WHEN DECIDING A MOTION TO POSTPONE A SET ARGUMENT DATE.
Filed by:
Print Name: Maurene Comey
Date: June 30, 2023
Signature: /s/Maurene Comey
(Revised December 2011)
DOJ-OGR-00021741

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document