This document page appears to be an excerpt from a narrative or interview (possibly a book or article included in evidence) labeled with a House Oversight footer. It details an interview with Patti Thomas, representing an entity called 'Connection' (likely a publication related to 'alternative lifestyles' or swinging). The text outlines a legal battle starting in 1995 regarding First Amendment rights and the constitutionality of a specific law affecting the swinger community, mentioning appeals and potential escalation to the Supreme Court.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Patti Thomas | Interviewee / Spokesperson |
Speaking on behalf of 'Connection' regarding a lawsuit and the rights of the swinger community.
|
| Unidentified Narrator | Interviewer |
Conducting an interview with Patti Thomas.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Connection |
Company/Publication that filed a suit challenging the constitutionality of a specific law.
|
|
| Court of Appeals |
Judicial body mentioned regarding the appeal of their case.
|
|
| Supreme Court |
Judicial body mentioned as a potential destination for the lawsuit.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015211'.
|
"fucking sick and tired of do-gooders trying to tell me how I should live my life!"Source
"The justice system in this country just makes no sense to me whatsoever"Source
"Our suit was filed not only for the benefit of our company but because we felt that this outrageous law was totally infringing on the civil rights and freedoms of people involved in alternative lifestyles."Source
"Obviously, the average person involved in swinging would have no way of combating this law on their own."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,278 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document