DOJ-OGR-00001211.jpg
499 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
5
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
499 KB
Summary
This legal document is a court order denying a defendant's renewed motion for release on bail. The court justifies the denial by citing the seriousness of the charges (facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse), strong government evidence, the defendant's substantial financial resources, foreign ties to a non-extradition country, and a lack of candor about her finances, concluding she is a flight risk. The document outlines the case's background, including the indictment on June 29, 2020, her arrest on July 2, 2020, and the denial of her first bail motion on July 14, 2020.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
The subject of the legal proceedings, charged with facilitating sexual abuse, and whose motion for bail is being denied.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Mentioned as the individual whose sexual abuse of minor victims the Defendant is charged with facilitating.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
Mentioned as the entity proffering evidence against the Defendant and filing a Superseding Indictment.
|
| Court | government agency |
The judicial body that denied the Defendant's motions for release on bail and held a hearing.
|
| grand jury in the Southern District of New York | government agency |
The body that returned a six-count Indictment against the Defendant.
|
Timeline (5 events)
2020-06-29
A grand jury in the Southern District of New York returned a six-count Indictment against the Defendant.
Southern District of New York
2020-07-02
2020-07-14
The Court held a hearing regarding the Defendant’s request for bail and denied the first motion for release.
The Court denies the Defendant's renewed motion for release on bail.
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location of the grand jury that returned the indictment.
|
|
|
The location where the Defendant was arrested.
|
Relationships (1)
The document states the Defendant is charged with "facilitating Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse of multiple minor victims between approximately 1994 and 1997."
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,010 characters)
Case: 20-07008-AJN Document 1062 Filed 06/30/20 Page 21 of 522
combination of conditions can ensure her appearance. This is so because: the charges, which carry a presumption of detention, are serious and carry lengthy terms of imprisonment if convicted; the evidence proffered by the Government, including multiple corroborating and corroborated witnesses, is strong; the Defendant has substantial resources and foreign ties (including citizenship in a country that does not extradite its citizens); and the Defendant, who lived in hiding and apart from the family to whom she now asserts important ties, has not been fully candid about her financial situation. Thus, for substantially the same reasons that the Court denied the Defendant’s first motion for release on July 14, 2020, the Court DENIES the Defendant’s renewed motion for release on bail.¹
I. Background
On June 29, 2020, a grand jury in the Southern District of New York returned a six-count Indictment against the Defendant, charging her with facilitating Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse of multiple minor victims between approximately 1994 and 1997. See Dkt. No. 1. On July 2, 2020, the Indictment was unsealed, and that same day, the Defendant was arrested in New Hampshire. On July 8, 2020, the Government filed a Superseding Indictment, which contained only small ministerial corrections. Dkt. No. 17.
On July 14, 2020, this Court held a hearing regarding the Defendant’s request for bail. After a thorough consideration of all of the Defendant’s arguments and of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g), the Court concluded that no conditions or combination of conditions could reasonably assure the Defendant’s appearance, determining as a result that the Defendant was a flight risk and that detention without bail was warranted under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(1). The
¹ This Opinion & Order will be temporarily sealed in order to allow the parties to propose redactions to sensitive or confidential information.
2
DOJ-OGR-00001211
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document