You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
EFTA00027919.pdf
89.5 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
89.5 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain between prosecutors at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) from August 6 to August 9, 2019. The discussion concerns a draft letter responding to preservation requests from Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel. The team debates whether to send the response on Friday, August 9, or wait until Monday, August 12, ultimately noting that the delay would not be problematic for the defense.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Mentioned in subject line regarding 'Epstein defense preservation requests' and file attachment 'JE'.
|
| Redacted Sender/Recipient | Assistant U.S. Attorney |
Sender of the email on Aug 06, 2019, identified by signature block.
|
| Defense Counsel | Legal Defense |
Recipients of the drafted letter.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (listed in email headers).
|
|
| Southern District of New York |
Listed in signature block of Assistant U.S. Attorney.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2019-08-09
Internal SDNY discussion regarding the timing of a response letter to Epstein's defense team regarding preservation requests.
New York
USANYS Staff
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the prosecutors.
|
Relationships (1)
Drafting response to 'Epstein defense preservation requests'.
Key Quotes (3)
"realistically I don't think the defense can make much more hay about having gotten a response on the 9th versus the 12th"Source
EFTA00027919.pdf
Quote #1
"If we don't get this out until Monday is that a problem?"Source
EFTA00027919.pdf
Quote #2
"The attached is based on our conversations with [Redacted], including his email with suggested language for the prefatory language, and responds to the two attached defense letters."Source
EFTA00027919.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (3,060 characters)
From: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
To: "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
Cc: '[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>; "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>; "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 17:25:34 +0000
To: "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
Cc: '[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>; "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>; "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 17:25:34 +0000
Okay, thanks. [Redacted] is signed off but we may have to chat briefly with [Redacted] when he's back on Monday.
Sent from my iPhone
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 9, 2019, at 1:21 PM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
I'm totally available to update it this afternoon if there are edits today, but realistically I don't think the defense can make much more hay about having gotten a response on the 9th versus the 12th
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2019 13:20
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2019 13:20
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
If we don't get this out until Monday is that a problem?
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 8, 2019, at 5:56 PM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
No problem, thanks, and the edits were all straightforward. Updated version attached, everything incorporated, and can go to [Redacted] — I'm out of commission the next couple hours but back after that.
thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2019 16:36
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2019 16:36
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Sorry for the delay. Combined edits from both of us, attached. Can you take a look and clean up — we would then like to give [Redacted] at least the option of weighing in before we send to defense counsel.
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 11:44 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
EFTA00027919
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 11:44 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
EFTA00027919
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Wanted to bump this from Tuesday, especially since I know you guys are out tomorrow — hopefully we can send it out today? Happy to incorporate any edits etc. Thanks.
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2019 15:01
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2019 15:01
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
[Redacted],
This has been in the works for a little while, due to various other things that have come up in the interim, but we didn't want it to get lost given the discovery motion schedule. The attached is based on our conversations with [Redacted], including his email with suggested language for the prefatory language, and responds to the two attached defense letters. Happy to discuss anytime and to incorporate comments and suggestions.
thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
<2019-08-08, JE, letter to defense re preservation requests.docx>
EFTA00027920
EFTA00027920
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document