Redacted Sender/Recipient
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
EFTA00038153.pdf
This document is an email chain from October to November 2020 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and a redacted individual coordinating with the DOJ regarding a meeting for Epstein victims. The discussion focuses on logistics for victims who cannot travel, listing client locations in the US, Spain, South Africa, and Australia, and addresses an unexpected RSVP from a victim not on the original client list. McCawley confirms she intends to attend the meeting in person.
EFTA00036576.pdf
An email chain from August 11, 2019 (the day after Jeffrey Epstein's death) between officials at the OAG and BOP. The discussion focuses on gathering information to counter media speculation regarding Epstein's removal from Suicide Watch (SW). The emails provide statistics showing the median length of SW is 1.5 days and explain that SW is a highly restrictive short-term intervention inconsistent with long-term quality of life.
EFTA00032756.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between the FBI (New York field office) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondents, including an individual identified as 'Ted' at USANYS, are arranging a 'quick status call on Epstein' scheduled for 4:45 PM.
EFTA00032123.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 1, 2020, between attorney Bruce Barket and redacted officials regarding the safety of inmate Mr. Tartaglione at the MCC. Barket argues that Tartaglione, a retired police officer previously assaulted in custody, is being forced to choose between an unsafe general population tier or the SHU (solitary), despite previously being in a safe cell. Barket urges officials to return Tartaglione to his previous safe housing arrangement.
EFTA00031821.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2020 between attorney Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and redacted recipients (likely prosecutors). The correspondence concerns the filing of a victim impact statement to oppose Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for bail. The email includes the full text of the statement, in which the victim describes Maxwell as a 'psychopath' who sexually abused them as a child, groomed victims for Epstein, and poses a significant flight risk.
EFTA00031417.pdf
An email chain from August 2020 involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the SDNY and staff at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The correspondence concerns the protocols and logistics for delivering a hard drive containing discovery materials to inmate Ghislaine Maxwell, including requirements for etching the drive, authorization memos, and password protection policies. The final email tracks the package, asking which carrier was used.
EFTA00030872.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 7-8, 2021, between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and likely BOP/MDC officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The AUSA requested permission for Maxwell's defense counsel to hand-deliver a hard drive containing discovery materials to the MDC because Maxwell could not view the previous CD and the AUSA's office could not deliver it before the weekend. The request was denied, with the respondent stating the materials must come directly from the US Attorney's office.
EFTA00030489.pdf
An email exchange dated August 16, 2021, between personnel at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). One AUSA requests to see the opposition papers after noting that Judge Nathan denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a Bill of Particulars (BoP). The recipient replies with two attached documents containing the government's opposition to defense motions.
EFTA00030290.pdf
This document is an email chain between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and officials at the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). The correspondence, spanning from February to July 2019, involves the AUSA initiating contact to discuss 'deconfliction' regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The chain shows coordination efforts, scheduling of calls involving cocounsel Steve Fenn, and mentions the AUSA's involvement in Grand Jury proceedings in February 2019.
EFTA00030267.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 2019 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (Alex Conlon, Alexandra Elenowitz-Hess) and federal prosecutors/investigators regarding a 'proffer' meeting. The attorneys are arranging a meeting for their client (a female witness whose name is redacted) to provide information regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The government requests the client's current legal name and any phone numbers she used to communicate with Epstein. A meeting is scheduled for Friday, April 5, 2019, attended by the defense counsel, prosecutors, and an FBI Special Agent.
EFTA00029882.pdf
This document is an email chain from July and August 2020 between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and another party (likely defense counsel or a technical vendor) regarding the status of evidence in the Epstein case. Key issues discussed include the discovery of approximately 71,000 'zero byte' (empty) files, the physical failure of hard drives requiring specialist recovery at HQ, and discrepancies between evidence spreadsheets and the actual files provided on discs. Specific evidence items are referenced by 'NYC' numbers (e.g., NYC024328, NYC027913).
EFTA00029484.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2019 regarding a travel voucher for a trip taken by a DOJ employee/agent. The trip, identified as 'U.S. v. Epstein - Witness Interviews Trip' (R19NYS13842), took place in Santa Monica from September 17-20, 2019. The correspondence discusses technical issues with the payment system and confirms that vouchers are being held.
EFTA00029183.pdf
An email chain from May 2021 involving attorney Joe Nascimento and the FBI/US Attorney's Office regarding an Epstein-related investigation. The correspondence concerns the signing and exchange of a 'proffer agreement' and references 'notes for the 302' (FBI interview notes). The chain documents the logistics of sending the correct attachments and obtaining initials on the legal documents.
EFTA00029068.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 2020 involving Marc A. Weinstein of Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP and an unnamed government official. Weinstein reports fabricated warranty deeds filed against Jeffrey Epstein's properties in Palm Beach and New Mexico. The official responds that their office has declined to open an investigation and advises Weinstein to contact local authorities.
EFTA00029020.pdf
This document is an internal DOJ/US Attorney's Office email chain from June 2021 discussing a data security incident ('spill') related to the Ghislaine Maxwell prosecution. A contractor (employed by CACI) improperly uploaded 5.5 GB of discovery material, which included under-age victim names and other PII from the Jeffrey Epstein case, to Sharefile.com instead of the secure USAfx system. The correspondence confirms the data contained sensitive victim information, discusses the lack of disciplinary action for one individual, and notes that a involved contractor was leaving CACI for unrelated reasons.
EFTA00027919.pdf
This document is an email chain between prosecutors at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) from August 6 to August 9, 2019. The discussion concerns a draft letter responding to preservation requests from Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel. The team debates whether to send the response on Friday, August 9, or wait until Monday, August 12, ultimately noting that the delay would not be problematic for the defense.
EFTA00027174.pdf
An email chain from April 22, 2021, among officials at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (Public Corruption Unit). The discussion concerns a substantive trial adjournment letter filed by Ghislaine Maxwell earlier that day and the government's impending response due at 5 PM. The emails coordinate the language regarding the trial team's availability and mention a request to file under seal.
EFTA00026857.pdf
This document contains a series of email exchanges within the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding travel authorizations for the Jeffrey Epstein investigation (Case 2018R01618). The emails, dating from March 2019 to February 2020, detail travel plans for prosecutors and investigators to conduct witness and victim interviews in various locations including Pensacola, West Palm Beach, Los Angeles, and Stockholm, Sweden. Specific flight details are provided for a February 2020 trip to Pensacola, along with references to booking refundable tickets and conference rooms for interviews.
EFTA00026606.pdf
An email chain from May 21, 2020, involving US Attorney's Office (SDNY) staff and contractors coordinating a conference call regarding 'Epstein' for the following day with senior leadership ('the brass'). The participants also arrange a preparatory discussion for the afternoon of May 21st to align on expectations.
EFTA00025482.pdf
This document is a lengthy email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and forensic technicians/FBI regarding the processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The correspondence covers technical difficulties with 'Relativity' software, the inability to link emails with attachments (specifically mentioning 'flight records' as a hypothetical example of a broken link), and the inventory of seized devices including servers, computers, and hard drives dating back to a 2007 search. A significant event noted is the mandated deletion of 400 TB of 'old stuff' due to a network replacement at the agency handling the data.
EFTA00025196.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from March 8-9, 2021, between defense attorney Laura Menninger and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The correspondence concerns a request to view evidence, specifically discussing spreadsheets indexing physical evidence seized by the FBI from Jeffrey Epstein's residences in New York and the US Virgin Islands in 2019. The prosecutors note that while some evidence is indexed in Excel, other items like search warrant returns are not, and they mention specific Bates ranges for previously produced scans.
EFTA00025125.pdf
This document is an email chain from February and March 2020 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. They are scheduling an in-person interview/meeting for McCawley's client, referred to as 'Ms. [Redacted]', to take place on March 4, 2020, at the SDNY offices at 1 St. Andrews Plaza, New York. The subject line references the 'Epstein investigation'.
EFTA00024487.pdf
This document is an email chain from January to March 2020 between officials at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and likely the Department of Justice (DOJ). The correspondence concerns the approval process for a 'Sweden travel memo' related to the Epstein case, noting delays in receiving approval from the OIA (Office of International Affairs). The participants coordinate signatures and schedule brief meetings to finalize the travel approval form.
EFTA00024471.pdf
An email chain between Assistant US Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) discussing trial scheduling for 2021. The email explicitly lists a scheduled trial for June 21, 2021, for 'U.S. v. Noel (MCC Epstein guards)', referring to the prosecution of Tova Noel, one of the guards on duty when Jeffrey Epstein died. The schedule also references high-profile trials for Steve Bannon and Lev Parnas.
EFTA00021935.pdf
An email chain from July 2020 between officials at the USAO SDNY regarding new Bureau of Prisons (BOP) documents. The Co-Chief of the Narcotics Unit identifies specific pages to be withheld because they impact 'Tartaglione' (Nicholas Tartaglione), specifically citing reports related to the 'July 23 incident' involving Epstein's mental health and Tartaglione's disciplinary history.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity