DOJ-OGR-00000934.jpg
616 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
4
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
616 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of case 21-770, argues for granting bond by citing four precedent cases from the Southern District of New York (Hussain, Buser, Acosta, and McFadden). In each cited case, defendants charged under similar statutes (18 U.S.C. 2422 and 2423) were granted personal recognizance bonds ranging from $100,000 to $250,000 with various conditions like home detention and electronic monitoring. The document uses these examples to demonstrate a pattern of granting bond in similar circumstances within the same jurisdiction.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Hussain | defendant |
Defendant in the case United States v. Hussain, charged with 18 U.S.C. 2422 violations and granted a $100,000 bond.
|
| Buser | defendant |
Defendant in the case United States v. Buser, charged with 18 U.S.C. 2422 and 2423 violations and granted a $100,000 ...
|
| Acosta | defendant |
Defendant in the case United States v. Acosta, charged with 18 U.S.C. 2422 violations and granted a $100,000 bond.
|
| McFadden | defendant |
Defendant in the case United States v. McFadden, charged with 18 U.S.C. 2422 and 2423 violations and granted a $250,0...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | government agency |
Plaintiff in four cited court cases: United States v. Hussain, United States v. Buser, United States v. Acosta, and U...
|
| Southern District of New York | government agency |
The court district where the cited cases (Hussain, Buser, Acosta, McFadden) were adjudicated.
|
| Government | government agency |
Mentioned in the context of its detention application being denied in the Acosta case.
|
Timeline (4 events)
2016-03-29
In United States v. Acosta, the court denied the Government's detention application and granted the defendant a $100,000 personal recognizance bond with conditions including home detention and electronic monitoring.
Southern District of New York
2017-06-22
In United States v. McFadden, the defendant was granted a $250,000 personal recognizance bond secured by property, with conditions including home detention and electronic monitoring.
Southern District of New York
2017-10-19
In United States v. Buser, the defendant was granted a $100,000 personal recognizance bond secured by $10,000 cash, with conditions including electronic monitoring.
Southern District of New York
2018-10-02
In United States v. Hussain, the defendant was granted a $100,000 personal recognizance bond with conditions including home detention and electronic monitoring.
Southern District of New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where defendants charged under a specific statute are regularly granted bond, as per the document's argument.
|
Relationships (4)
The document cites the court case 'United States v. Hussain', indicating an adversarial legal relationship where the United States is the plaintiff and Hussain is the defendant.
The document cites the court case 'United States v. Buser', indicating an adversarial legal relationship where the United States is the plaintiff and Buser is the defendant.
The document cites the court case 'United States v. Acosta', indicating an adversarial legal relationship where the United States is the plaintiff and Acosta is the defendant.
The document cites the court case 'United States v. McFadden', indicating an adversarial legal relationship where the United States is the plaintiff and McFadden is the defendant.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,222 characters)
Case 21-770, Document 20-1, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page24 of 31
This is why defendants charged under the same statute in the
Southern District of New York are regularly granted bond. United
States v. Hussain, 18-mj-08262-UA (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 2, 2018) (defendant
charged with 18 U.S.C. 2422 violations granted $100,000 personal
recognizance bond with home detention, electronic monitoring, and
other conditions); United States v. Buser, 17-mj-07599-UA (S.D.N.Y.
Oct. 19, 2017) (defendant charged with 18 U.S.C. 2422 and 2423
violations granted $100,000 personal recognizance bond, secured by
$10,000 cash, with electronic monitoring and other conditions); United
States v. Acosta, 16-mj-08569-UA (S.D.N.Y Mar. 29, 2016) (denying the
Government’s detention application after argument and granting
defendant charged with 18 U.S.C. 2422 violations $100,000 personal
recognizance bond with home detention, electronic monitoring, and
other conditions); United States v. McFadden, 17-mj-04708-UA
(S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2017) (defendant charged with 18 U.S.C. 2422 and
2423 violations granted $250,000 personal recognizance bond, secured
by property, with home detention, electronic monitoring and other
conditions).
Southern District of New York are regularly granted bond. United
States v. Hussain, 18-mj-08262-UA (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 2, 2018) (defendant
charged with 18 U.S.C. 2422 violations granted $100,000 personal
recognizance bond with home detention, electronic monitoring, and
other conditions); United States v. Buser, 17-mj-07599-UA (S.D.N.Y.
Oct. 19, 2017) (defendant charged with 18 U.S.C. 2422 and 2423
violations granted $100,000 personal recognizance bond, secured by
$10,000 cash, with electronic monitoring and other conditions); United
States v. Acosta, 16-mj-08569-UA (S.D.N.Y Mar. 29, 2016) (denying the
Government’s detention application after argument and granting
defendant charged with 18 U.S.C. 2422 violations $100,000 personal
recognizance bond with home detention, electronic monitoring, and
other conditions); United States v. McFadden, 17-mj-04708-UA
(S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2017) (defendant charged with 18 U.S.C. 2422 and
2423 violations granted $250,000 personal recognizance bond, secured
by property, with home detention, electronic monitoring and other
conditions).
22
DOJ-OGR-00000934
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document