DOJ-OGR-00009748.jpg
555 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
555 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE filed on March 11, 2022, outlines a request for evidence related to potential misconduct by "Juror No. 50". It seeks communications, social media activity, and records of payments to the juror regarding their jury service. The document also discusses a hearing concerning the misconduct, which involves another juror who also allegedly failed to disclose being a victim of childhood sexual abuse, potentially implicating the entire jury's verdict.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | Juror |
The central figure in an investigation for juror misconduct, including communications with media and potential non-di...
|
| one other juror | Juror |
An unnamed juror who also allegedly did not disclose being a victim of sexual abuse as a child.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| company |
Mentioned as a social media platform from which communications and posts by Juror No. 50 are being requested.
|
|
| company |
Mentioned as a social media platform from which communications and posts by Juror No. 50 are being requested.
|
|
| company |
Mentioned as a social media platform from which communications and posts by Juror No. 50 are being requested.
|
|
| company |
Mentioned as a social media platform from which communications and posts by Juror No. 50 are being requested.
|
|
| New York Times | media organization |
Cited as a source, along with Juror No. 50, for the information that another juror did not disclose being a victim of...
|
Timeline (2 events)
Potential misconduct by Juror No. 50 and another juror who allegedly did not disclose being victims of sexual abuse as children. This misconduct is said to potentially implicate all 12 jurors.
A hearing is being discussed to address the identified juror misconduct.
Relationships (2)
They served on the same jury. The document alleges both failed to disclose that they were victims of sexual abuse as children.
They served on the same jury. The document notes that what Juror No. 50 said to the other jurors is relevant to the investigation.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,409 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 642 Filed 03/11/22 Page 56 of 66
c. Non-privileged emails or other written communications between Juror No. 50 and any other person, including any news or media organization about Juror No. 50’s service as a juror in this case;
d. Any record of payments to Juror No. 50 in exchange for any interview or information about his service as a juror in this case;
d. Any record of payments to Juror No. 50 in exchange for any interview or information about his service as a juror in this case;
2. Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, or other social media networking platforms identified by the parties, to produce:
a. All communications to and from Juror No. 50 regarding his service as a juror in this case;
b. All posts, comments, or photographs posted by Juror No. 50 regarding his service as a juror in this case.
c. All documents reflecting dates on which Juror No. 50 opened or closed his accounts.
a. All communications to and from Juror No. 50 regarding his service as a juror in this case;
b. All posts, comments, or photographs posted by Juror No. 50 regarding his service as a juror in this case.
c. All documents reflecting dates on which Juror No. 50 opened or closed his accounts.
B. The hearing itself
The misconduct identified potentially implicates all 12 jurors who rendered a verdict here. According to Juror No. 50 and the New York Times, one other juror did not disclose that he or she was the victim of sexual abuse as a child. Nevertheless, that juror’s experiences were discussed apparently in support of Juror No. 50’s position. What these two jurors disclosed to the (presumably) ten jurors who responded to the questionnaire truthfully will be relevant to determine the identity of the second juror and what Juror No. 50 said to the other jurors.
49
DOJ-OGR-00009748
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document