DOJ-OGR-00016900.jpg
586 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
4
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
586 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, argues for the admissibility of a deposition transcript of Mr. Epstein. The deposition, taken by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, concerns when Epstein moved from a property on East 69th Street to 9 East 71st Street, which he stated was around January 1996. Rohrbach compares this evidentiary issue to a separate matter involving '44 Kinnerton Street'.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Judge Chin | Judge |
Mentioned in reference to a past decision and finding of fact.
|
| Mr. Epstein | Deponent |
Subject of a deposition transcript where he was asked about moving residences in 1996.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney (implied) |
A speaker in the transcript, addressing the court about admitting evidence.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, interacting with Mr. Rohrbach.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York | Government agency |
Took the deposition of Mr. Epstein.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed as the court reporting service at the bottom of the page.
|
Timeline (2 events)
1996-01
2022-08-10
A court proceeding where Mr. Rohrbach discusses admitting a deposition transcript as evidence.
Southern District of New York
Locations (4)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
A property Mr. Epstein vacated around January 1996.
|
|
|
The property Mr. Epstein moved to from East 69th.
|
|
|
The jurisdiction where the U.S. Attorney's Office took Mr. Epstein's deposition.
|
|
|
Mentioned by Mr. Rohrbach as a point of comparison for the current issue being discussed.
|
Relationships (2)
Mr. Rohrbach is addressing the court as 'your Honor' and presenting arguments in a formal court setting.
The U.S. Attorney's Office conducted a deposition of Mr. Epstein, indicating a formal legal proceeding or investigation.
Key Quotes (3)
"You asked me that question three times. I believe it is around then, but I don't know exactly when."Source
— Mr. Epstein
(His response during a deposition when asked about the timing of his move in early 1996.)
DOJ-OGR-00016900.jpg
Quote #1
"Okay. One at a time, Mr. Rohrbach."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's instruction to the attorney during the hearing.)
DOJ-OGR-00016900.jpg
Quote #2
"This is very much like the 44 Kinnerton Street issues we've been talking about."Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Comparing the current evidentiary point to a previously discussed matter.)
DOJ-OGR-00016900.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,576 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 171 of 197
LCHVMAX6
2712
1 admission that he vacated East 69th in or about January '96,
2 and then Judge Chin's decision making that finding of fact.
3 There is one other document from that docket that we
4 seek to admit, but under a separate rule of evidence,
5 804(b)(1). There was actually a deposition transcript from
6 Mr. Epstein in which he is asked -- and it was taken by the
7 U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
8 And he was asked in that deposition, Is it correct that you
9 moved from the premises -- meaning East 69th -- to 9 East 71st
10 Street in or around the beginning of '96?
11 And Mr. Epstein responded, You asked me that question
12 three times. I believe it is around then, but I don't know
13 exactly when.
14 This deposition excerpt was appended to a pleading
15 that was submitted by the U.S. Attorney's Office in support of
16 their case at docket number 52. So I believe that one is
17 admissible under 804(b)(1), the deposition transcript.
18 THE COURT: Okay. One at a time, Mr. Rohrbach.
19 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.
20 I will go through each of the documents, but just as a
21 substantive point, this is very much like the 44 Kinnerton
22 Street issues we've been talking about.
23 And substantively --
24 THE COURT: Microphone.
25 MR. ROHRBACH: This is very much like the 44 Kinnerton
LCHVMAX6
2712
1 admission that he vacated East 69th in or about January '96,
2 and then Judge Chin's decision making that finding of fact.
3 There is one other document from that docket that we
4 seek to admit, but under a separate rule of evidence,
5 804(b)(1). There was actually a deposition transcript from
6 Mr. Epstein in which he is asked -- and it was taken by the
7 U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
8 And he was asked in that deposition, Is it correct that you
9 moved from the premises -- meaning East 69th -- to 9 East 71st
10 Street in or around the beginning of '96?
11 And Mr. Epstein responded, You asked me that question
12 three times. I believe it is around then, but I don't know
13 exactly when.
14 This deposition excerpt was appended to a pleading
15 that was submitted by the U.S. Attorney's Office in support of
16 their case at docket number 52. So I believe that one is
17 admissible under 804(b)(1), the deposition transcript.
18 THE COURT: Okay. One at a time, Mr. Rohrbach.
19 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.
20 I will go through each of the documents, but just as a
21 substantive point, this is very much like the 44 Kinnerton
22 Street issues we've been talking about.
23 And substantively --
24 THE COURT: Microphone.
25 MR. ROHRBACH: This is very much like the 44 Kinnerton
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016900
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document