Judge Chin

Person
Mentions
8
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
4

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00016903.jpg

This document is a court transcript where an unidentified speaker argues against the relevance of certain documents concerning a past lawsuit. The speaker explains that a prior litigation between the government and Mr. Epstein centered on an illegal sublet attempt and property abandonment in 1995-1996, asserting these were not material facts to the current case and thus do not warrant judicial notice.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016901.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where an attorney, Ms. Menninger, argues that a statement about when Mr. Epstein abandoned a property is not a settled fact. She contends that defense witnesses could have testified that Epstein lived on East 71st Street prior to 1996, contradicting the idea he abandoned it then, and references a prior opinion by Judge Chin to support her argument that the facts are disputable. The transcript ends with the presiding judge asking to see the document under discussion.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016900.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, argues for the admissibility of a deposition transcript of Mr. Epstein. The deposition, taken by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, concerns when Epstein moved from a property on East 69th Street to 9 East 71st Street, which he stated was around January 1996. Rohrbach compares this evidentiary issue to a separate matter involving '44 Kinnerton Street'.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016899.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. A lawyer is arguing for judicial notice under Federal Rule of Evidence 201 regarding a fact established in a previous case: that Jeffrey Epstein vacated his East 69th Street residence in January 1996 and leased it to a Mr. Fisher. The text references specific docket entries (15, 45, 46) and an opinion by Judge Chin from that prior litigation to establish the timeline of Epstein's residence.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
1
As Recipient
0
Total
1

No Subject

From: Judge Chin
To: Unknown

A judicial opinion by Judge Chin that contains a background section about Mr. Epstein's property issues.

Summary judgment opinion
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity