This legal document page discusses a bail hearing for a defendant, Ms. Maxwell. It recounts that the Court initially found her financial disclosures incomplete but notes she has since provided a more detailed report from a UK accounting firm, Macalvins, covering 2015-2020. Despite the new report, which was also reviewed by a former IRS agent, the Court remains unpersuaded that the proposed bail package, secured by property, cash, and bonds, would reasonably assure her appearance in court.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Identified as the Defendant whose finances are being discussed in a bail hearing context.
|
| Defendant's friends and family members |
Mentioned as co-signers for five of the six additional bonds in the proposed bail package.
|
|
| Defendant's spouse |
Mentioned as a joint holder of assets with the Defendant, as analyzed by Macalvins.
|
|
| Certified Fraud Examiner and a former IRS Special Agent | Certified Fraud Examiner and former IRS Special Agent |
Retained by the Defendant to review the Macalvins report and underlying financial documents.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Macalvins | company |
An accounting firm in the United Kingdom hired by the Defendant to prepare a report on her finances.
|
| IRS | government agency |
Mentioned as the former employer of the Special Agent retained by the Defendant (former IRS Special Agent).
|
| The Court | government agency |
The judicial body presiding over the Defendant's case and bail hearing.
|
| The Government | government agency |
The prosecuting party in the legal case, arguing against the bail package.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location of the accounting firm, Macalvins.
|
"a clear picture of Ms. Maxwell’s finances and the resources available to her."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,078 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document