Macalvins
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Reviewer subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional accountant reporter |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Review | A Certified Fraud Examiner and former IRS Special Agent reviewed the Macalvins report and underly... | N/A | View |
| 2017-04-30 | Report preparation | Macalvins prepared a report of financial condition for Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2015-01-01 | Financial analysis | Macalvins conducted a five-year analysis of Ms. Maxwell's assets and finances. | United Kingdom | View |
| 2015-01-01 | Financial analysis | Macalvins analyzed the Defendant's assets and finances for the five-year period from 2015 to 2020. | United Kingdom | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | Period covered by the financial analysis performed by Macalvins | United Kingdom / Global | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | Period covered by the Financial Condition Report regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's assets. | N/A | View |
EFTA00013307.pdf
This document is an Opinion and Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail. The court found that Maxwell presents a significant flight risk due to her substantial financial resources, international ties (citizenship in France and UK), and lack of candor regarding her finances. The proposed $28.5 million bail package and offer to waive extradition rights were deemed insufficient to reasonably assure her appearance at trial.
EFTA00011180.pdf
This document is a formal statement by forensic accountant Preston M. Faro, owner of Preston M. Faro & Associates Inc. Faro was hired by the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP to independently verify a 'Financial Condition Report' prepared by Macalvins Accountants regarding the assets of Ghislaine Maxwell and her husband for the period 2015-2020. Faro details his extensive background in fraud investigation with the IRS and FBI before concluding that the Macalvins report is a complete and accurate summary of Maxwell's financial assets.
EFTA00011168.pdf
This document is a sworn statement by a forensic accountant and former IRS-CID Special Agent hired by the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP. The expert was tasked with independently reviewing a Financial Condition Report prepared by Macalvins Accountants regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's assets for the period of 2015-2020. The expert concludes that the report accurately summarizes the assets held by Maxwell, her husband, and related trusts.
DOJ-OGR-00001226.jpg
This legal document page discusses a bail hearing for a defendant, Ms. Maxwell. It recounts that the Court initially found her financial disclosures incomplete but notes she has since provided a more detailed report from a UK accounting firm, Macalvins, covering 2015-2020. Despite the new report, which was also reviewed by a former IRS agent, the Court remains unpersuaded that the proposed bail package, secured by property, cash, and bonds, would reasonably assure her appearance in court.
DOJ-OGR-00001119.jpg
This page from a defense filing argues for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail, citing a 'Macalvins report' to refute Government claims that her finances are opaque. The defense states that Maxwell and her spouse have total assets of approximately $22.5 million, which they offer as the bond amount, and asserts she has properly filed all FBAR and tax documents. A footnote heavily redacts the name of a specific bank involved in her finances.
DOJ-OGR-00001118.jpg
This court filing details Ghislaine Maxwell's financial history from 2015 to 2020, citing a 'Macalvins report.' It documents her 2015 net worth ($20.2M), the sale of an NYC apartment for $15M, her 2016 marriage, and the subsequent transfer of assets into a trust controlled by her spouse. Footnotes clarify discrepancies between her self-reported assets during a Pretrial Services interview ($3.8M) and her actual financial standing, attributing the difference to lack of access to records while detained.
DOJ-OGR-00001117.jpg
This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell has addressed the court's concerns about her finances, which were raised at an initial bail hearing. Her defense counsel hired a UK accounting firm, Macalvins, to conduct a thorough five-year financial analysis, and a former IRS Special Agent and Certified Fraud Examiner reviewed and validated this analysis as complete and accurate. The purpose is to demonstrate financial transparency to the court to establish suitable bail conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00002249.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from December 30, 2020, discusses a bail application for a defendant, Ms. Maxwell. It recounts that the Court initially found her financial disclosures incomplete, but she has since provided a more detailed report from a UK accounting firm, Macalvins, and a review by a former IRS agent. Despite the new information, the Court remains unpersuaded that the proposed bail package, secured by $8 million in property and $500,000 in cash, would reasonably assure her appearance in court.
DOJ-OGR-00002249(1).jpg
This document is page 17 of a court order filed on December 30, 2020, denying bail conditions for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text details the defendant's proposed bail package, including $8 million in property, $500,000 in cash, and bonds co-signed by friends and family, supported by a financial report from UK firm Macalvins analyzing her assets from 2015-2020. Despite the submission of new financial data and verification by fraud examiners, the Court remains unpersuaded that the package reasonably assures her appearance.
DOJ-OGR-00002247.jpg
This page from a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) argues against granting bail to Ghislaine Maxwell, citing her lack of US employment ties, significant foreign connections, and flight risk. The text details her history of providing 'incomplete or erroneous' financial information to Pretrial Services, specifically noting a July 2020 incident where she underreported assets at $3.5 million and misrepresented her ownership status of a New Hampshire property. It references a report by the accounting firm Macalvins intended to clarify her finances.
DOJ-OGR-00002247(1).jpg
This document is page 15 of a court filing (Document 106) from December 30, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text argues for continued detention, citing Maxwell's lack of employment ties to the US, significant ties abroad, and a pattern of providing incomplete financial information to Pretrial Services, specifically underreporting assets by omitting spousal assets and trust accounts in July 2020. It references a financial report prepared by the accounting firm Macalvins and disputes Maxwell's defense that her financial misrepresentations were due to lack of access to records while detained.
DOJ-OGR-00002073.jpg
This document is a page from a legal declaration by a forensic accountant. The declarant outlines their experience working for law enforcement and on the World Trade Center Integrity Compliance Program. They state they were hired by the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP to independently review a financial report on Ghislaine Maxwell, which was prepared by Macalvins Accountants and covers the years 2015-2020.
DOJ-OGR-00002066.jpg
This legal document, part of a financial condition report, estimates Ghislaine Maxwell and her spouse's net worth at approximately $22.5 million as of October 31, 2020, noting this figure includes $7.67 million in advance legal fees. The report, covering 2015-2020, found no significant cash transfers outside of their control but contrasts this with a prior period (2007-2011) where over $20 million was transferred between Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The analysis was limited by the unavailability of complete bank statements.
DOJ-OGR-00002062.jpg
This document is the cover page for a 'Financial Condition Report' regarding Ghislaine Maxwell, covering the years 2015 through 2020. It was filed on December 14, 2020, as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, and was prepared by Macalvins Limited Chartered Accountants for the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP.
DOJ-OGR-00001995.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated December 14, 2020, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense. It references a 'Macalvins report' used to refute government claims that Maxwell's finances are opaque, asserting that she and her spouse have fully disclosed assets totaling approximately $22.5 million, which is offered as the bond amount. A footnote contains redactions regarding the name of a specific bank to protect privacy or security.
DOJ-OGR-00001993.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Motion for Bail) arguing that Ghislaine Maxwell has now provided a thorough review of her finances for the years 2015-2020, addressing previous court concerns. Defense counsel retained UK accounting firm Macalvins to analyze bank statements, tax returns, and FBAR filings for Maxwell and her spouse. This report was further validated by a redacted former IRS Special Agent with 40 years of experience in financial fraud.
DOJ-OGR-00020037.jpg
This document is page 17 of a legal filing (Defense Bail Submission) dated December 8, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. It cites a 'Macalvins report' to refute government claims that Maxwell's finances are opaque, stating that she and her spouse have disclosed all assets, which total approximately $22.5 million—the exact amount proposed for the bond. A footnote contains redactions regarding the name of a specific bank involved in her finances.
DOJ-OGR-00020142.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court argues against granting bail, citing Maxwell's lack of employment ties to the US, significant ties abroad, and a pattern of providing erroneous financial information to Pretrial Services, specifically underreporting her assets in July 2020 by omitting her spouse's assets and trust accounts.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity