DOJ-OGR-00000529.jpg
574 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
574 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019. In it, an attorney named Mr. Rossmiller responds to the Court, stating that Florida police reports suggest the defendant harassed individuals through agents or investigators. Mr. Rossmiller also explains that the government took no position on the defendant's application to seal financial information because they were unsure what would be submitted and had little time to respond.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Asks Mr. Rossmiller to elaborate on Florida police reports.
|
| MR. ROSSMILLER | Attorney (likely for the government) |
Responds to the Court's questions regarding Florida police reports and the defendant's financial information.
|
| defendant | Defendant |
The subject of the court proceedings, alleged to have harassed or interfered with individuals via agents or investiga...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Florida police | government agency |
Mentioned in relation to reports about the defendant's activities.
|
| the government | government agency |
Represented by Mr. Rossmiller, took no position on the defendant's sealing application for financial information.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed as the court reporting service at the bottom of the page.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2019-07-24
A court hearing where Mr. Rossmiller discusses evidence from Florida police reports and the government's position on sealing the defendant's financial information.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location of police who generated reports discussed in the transcript.
|
Relationships (2)
The document is a transcript of a formal dialogue between a judge (THE COURT) and an attorney (MR. ROSSMILLER) during a legal proceeding.
Mr. Rossmiller states that police reports suggest individuals believed they were being harassed and interfered with by the defendant or his agents.
Key Quotes (4)
"Could you go back to those Florida police reports and tell us what you think they demonstrate."Source
— THE COURT
(Question directed at Mr. Rossmiller during a court hearing.)
DOJ-OGR-00000529.jpg
Quote #1
"They certainly suggest that there were individuals who believed that they were being harassed and interfered with by the defendant or his agents."Source
— MR. ROSSMILLER
(Response to the Court's question about the contents of the Florida police reports.)
DOJ-OGR-00000529.jpg
Quote #2
"Now, those aren't charges proven in court. Those aren't convictions. But they certainly are factual occurrences that people reported contemporaneously and that are significant and concerning."Source
— MR. ROSSMILLER
(Clarifying the legal status of the events described in the police reports.)
DOJ-OGR-00000529.jpg
Quote #3
"the government took no position on the defendant's sealing application for, among other reasons, the fact that we did not know what they were going to submit."Source
— MR. ROSSMILLER
(Explaining the government's stance on a motion to seal financial information.)
DOJ-OGR-00000529.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,402 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 19 of 74 19
defendant.
THE COURT: Could you go back to those Florida police
reports and tell us what you think they demonstrate.
MR. ROSSMILLER: Yes, your Honor.
They certainly suggest that there were individuals who
_believed that they were being harassed and interfered with by
the defendant or his agents. That was investigators or other
individuals working on behalf of or at the behest of the
defendant.
Now, those aren't charges proven in court. Those
aren't convictions. But they certainly are factual occurrences
that people reported contemporaneously and that are significant
and concerning.
With respect to just a couple of the Court's
questions, bouncing around just slightly, with respect to the
financial information which, again, is limited at best, the
government took no position on the defendant's sealing
application for, among other reasons, the fact that we did not
know what they were going to submit. We imagined that it would
be more detailed.
Secondly, the government obviously had just hours to
respond to the defendant's at that point. So we took no
position and of course defer to the Court as to whether there
is a valid reason to seal such limited and summary information.
We will confer, your Honor, on whether we're able to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000529
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document