HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019856.jpg

2.3 MB

Extraction Summary

7
People
7
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal newsletter / client alert
File Size: 2.3 MB
Summary

This document is a March 2017 legal newsletter from Sadis Goldberg LLP. It features two main articles: one by Samuel J. Lieberman discussing a Supreme Court ruling (Salman v. U.S.) that makes it easier to prosecute insider trading involving gifts of information to family/friends, and another by Daniel G. Viola discussing the impact of the new Department of Labor Fiduciary Rule on financial advisers. The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee production, indicated by the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019856.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Yelena Maltser Editor
Editor of the S&G Investment Manager Alert, email listed as ymaltser@sglawyers.com
Samuel J. Lieberman Author
Author of the article regarding Supreme Court/Insider Trading
Daniel G. Viola Author
Author of the article regarding the DOL Fiduciary Rule
Gregory Hartmann Attorney
Mentioned in 'Inside this Issue' as joining Sadis & Goldberg's Corporate and Financial Services Practices
Salman Defendant (Case Law)
Subject of the U.S. Supreme Court case Salman v. U.S.
Newman Defendant (Case Law)
Subject of U.S. v. Newman, the precedent narrowed by the Salman ruling
Donald Trump President (Administration)
Mentioned in article title: 'What Impact Will the Trump Administration Have on the Hedge Fund Industry?'

Organizations (7)

Name Type Context
Sadis Goldberg LLP
Law firm publishing the newsletter
U.S. Supreme Court
Judicial body that ruled on Salman v. U.S.
Second Circuit
Lower appellate court mentioned regarding U.S. v. Newman
SEC
Securities and Exchange Commission, mentioned as being emboldened by the ruling
Department of Labor (DOL)
Government agency issuing the new Fiduciary Rule
Hedgeweek
Publication that gave permission to reprint Daniel G. Viola's article
FINRA
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, mentioned in 'Inside this Issue'

Timeline (2 events)

2017
Gregory Hartmann joins Sadis & Goldberg
N/A
Gregory Hartmann Sadis & Goldberg
March 2017
Publication of S&G Investment Manager Alert
N/A
Sadis Goldberg LLP

Relationships (1)

Gregory Hartmann Employment Sadis & Goldberg LLP
Sidebar item 7: 'Gregory Hartmann Joins Sadis & Goldberg's Corporate and Financial Services Practices'

Key Quotes (2)

"Salman will almost certainly embolden the SEC and federal prosecutors to bring more insider trading cases, because it is much easier for the government to prove a 'gift' to a 'friend' than to prove a 'pecuniary' or similar quid pro quo."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019856.jpg
Quote #1
"The Department of Labor’s (the 'DOL') new fiduciary ruling (the 'Rule') has created strife in the securities industry and has the potential to significantly impact how financial advisers and brokers will manage retirement accounts in the future."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019856.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,702 characters)

SadisGoldberg LLP
S&G INVESTMENT MANAGER Alert
Edited by Yelena Maltser • ymaltser@sglawyers.com
MARCH 2017
SUPREME COURT REJECTS NEWMAN REQUIREMENT OF “PECUNIARY OR SIMILARLY VALUABLE” PERSONAL BENEFIT FOR INSIDER TRADING LIABILITY FOR TIPPING FAMILY AND FRIENDS
BY SAMUEL J. LIEBERMAN
The U.S. Supreme Court gave the government a major victory in Salman v. U.S.,1 which lowers the standard for proving insider trading involving tipping family or friends, and will embolden the government to bring similar cases. Salman holds that a gift of inside information to a family or friend is sufficient to prove insider trading tipping liability—even if the tipper did not receive a valuable quid pro quo in exchange for the tip. This significantly narrows U.S. v. Newman, in which the Second Circuit (a lower appellate court) held that a tipper must receive “at least a potential gain of a pecuniary or similarly valuable nature,” (continued on page 2)
Salman will almost certainly embolden the SEC and federal prosecutors to bring more insider trading cases, because it is much easier for the government to prove a “gift” to a “friend” than to prove a “pecuniary” or similar quid pro quo.
Client Alert
Status of the New DOL Fiduciary Rule
BY DANIEL G. VIOLA
Reprinted with permission of Hedgeweek
The Department of Labor’s (the “DOL”) new fiduciary ruling (the “Rule”) has created strife in the securities industry and has the potential to significantly impact how financial advisers and brokers will manage retirement accounts in the future.
Currently, brokers, financial advisers, and other finance professionals do not legally have to act in a client’s best interest, with few exceptions, such as those who are registered as investment advisers with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or in individual states. Those who are not registered, like brokers, just have to prove that the investment is suitable, not necessarily the best option, for their client—no matter that that fund might be more expensive and provide (continued on page 2)
Inside this Issue
1 Supreme Court Rejects Newman Requirement of “Pecuniary or Similarly Valuable” Personal Benefit for Insider Trading Liability for Tipping Family and Friends
1 Status of the New DOL Fiduciary Rule
4 A Cautionary Tale in the Use of Non-Compete Agreements
5 The Question On All Of Our Minds: What Impact Will the Trump Administration Have on the Hedge Fund Industry?
6 Compliance Deadlines – Second Quarter 2017
7 SEC & FINRA Release 2017 Exam Priorities
7 Gregory Hartmann Joins Sadis & Goldberg’s Corporate and Financial Services Practices
8 Recent and Upcoming Events
WE PRACTICE LAW BUT WE LIVE BUSINESS
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019856

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document