Department of Labor (DOL)
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
The Board (NLRB)
|
Contradiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Board
|
Contradictory analysis |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-01-01 | N/A | Department of Labor-specific training session. | Unknown | View |
| 2011-05-20 | N/A | The Department of Labor (DOL) issued an implementing regulation for Executive Order 13496. | United States | View |
| 2010-05-20 | N/A | The Department of Labor issued a Final Rule implementing Executive Order 13496, effective June 21... | United States | View |
| 2010-05-20 | N/A | The Department of Labor issued a Final Rule implementing Executive Order 13496. | United States | View |
EFTA00030071.pdf
This document is an email dated October 18, 2019, circulated within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). It forwards a New York Times opinion piece by Gail Collins from July 2019 titled 'Trump Doesn’t Know About Labor,' which criticizes Labor Secretary Alex Acosta for his role in brokering Jeffrey Epstein's lenient plea deal in Florida and highlights Donald Trump's past social relationship with Epstein.
EFTA00026434.pdf
This document is a Law360 Public Policy email newsletter from April 4, 2019, summarizing various legal and political developments. Key topics include Senate rule changes for judicial nominees, the release of the Mueller Report, and a budget hearing where Labor Secretary Alex Acosta defended his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein sex crime case. The newsletter also covers antitrust cases, environmental rulings, and the 'Varsity Blues' college admissions scandal court appearances.
EFTA00018174.pdf
This document is an email dated July 11, 2019, forwarding a New York Times opinion column by Gail Collins titled 'Trump Doesn’t Know About Labor.' The article criticizes Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta for his role in securing a lenient plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein while U.S. Attorney in South Florida. It also highlights past comments by President Trump regarding his friendship with Epstein and discusses the transfer of the Epstein case to federal prosecutors in New York. The email subject line notes that the sender highlighted a specific part of the text, likely referring to the section about New York prosecutors.
EFTA00014454.pdf
This document is an email forwarding a Law360 article dated May 2, 2019. The article details Labor Secretary Alex Acosta's testimony before a House Committee, where he defended his previous actions as a U.S. Attorney regarding the lenient non-prosecution agreement granted to Jeffrey Epstein. The article notes that Judge Kenneth Marra recently ruled that Acosta violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act, though Acosta claimed he followed DOJ protocol. The report also covers Acosta's comments on labor regulations, including overtime rules and the minimum wage.
DOJ-OGR-00002539.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the timeline of events following the Miami Herald's 2018 reporting and Jeffrey Epstein's 2019 death. It covers the dismissal of the indictment against Epstein due to his suicide, the ongoing CVRA litigation by victims (specifically Jane Doe 1) in the 11th Circuit regarding the government's failure to confer with victims before the NPA, and the initiation of the OPR investigation requested by Senator Ben Sasse.
DOJ-OGR-00002537.jpg
This document serves as a historical summary of legal proceedings regarding Jeffrey Epstein between 2008 and 2018. It details his controversial work release program via the 'Florida Science Foundation,' the eventual unsealing of his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the subsequent civil litigation under the CVRA. It also covers Alexander Acosta's 2017 confirmation as Labor Secretary and the 2018 Miami Herald investigation exposing the lenient plea deal.
DOJ-OGR-00022085.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically a brief or motion, dated April 24, 2020. It argues that the involvement of agents from a government agency in an investigation does not automatically make the entire agency part of the "prosecution team" for discovery purposes. The text cites several legal precedents (Stein, Pelullo, Locascio, Ghailani, and Middendorf) to outline the factors courts use to determine the scope of the prosecution team and its disclosure obligations under Rule 16.
DOJ-OGR-00003207.jpg
This document, page 31 of a DOJ report (likely the OGR report), details the professional biographies and specific roles of USAO officials Jeffrey Sloman, Matthew Menchel, and Andrew Lourie in the Epstein investigation and the negotiation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It highlights Sloman's negotiation of an NPA addendum, Menchel's communication of the two-year plea deal, and Lourie's role in the NPA negotiations before his departure. The text also notes Alexander Acosta's resignation as Labor Secretary in 2019 due to criticism regarding the Epstein case.
DOJ-OGR-00003183.jpg
This page from a DOJ OPR report details the timeline following Jeffrey Epstein's August 2019 suicide, including the dismissal of his indictment in SDNY and the conclusion of CVRA litigation in Florida where the court found the government had not litigated in bad faith but had violated the CVRA. It summarizes the appellate history of 'Jane Doe 1' seeking a writ of mandamus in the 11th Circuit regarding the non-prosecution agreement (NPA). Additionally, it marks the initiation of the OPR investigation into DOJ attorney misconduct, triggered by a request from Senator Ben Sasse following the Miami Herald's November 2018 reporting.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019856.jpg
This document is a March 2017 legal newsletter from Sadis Goldberg LLP. It features two main articles: one by Samuel J. Lieberman discussing a Supreme Court ruling (Salman v. U.S.) that makes it easier to prosecute insider trading involving gifts of information to family/friends, and another by Daniel G. Viola discussing the impact of the new Department of Labor Fiduciary Rule on financial advisers. The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee production, indicated by the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019856.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024132.jpg
This document is a J.P. Morgan 'Eye on the Market' newsletter dated March 15, 2012. It analyzes global economic trends, specifically focusing on the strength of the US consumer, labor market improvements, and the contrast between US and European bank stress tests. While the content is generic financial analysis, the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a congressional investigation, likely related to the inquiry into J.P. Morgan's handling of Jeffrey Epstein's accounts, though Epstein is not explicitly named on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025857.jpg
This document page is an excerpt from a government report describing the history and workload of the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS), the federal FOIA ombudsman. It details the establishment of OGIS in 2009 under Director Miriam Nisbet, lists key operational milestones in late 2009, and provides a bar chart of caseload statistics from FY 2009 to FY 2013. While part of a House Oversight production often associated with Epstein inquiries, this specific page contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates; it appears to be administrative background material regarding FOIA processing capabilities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021732.jpg
This document appears to be a news article included in House Oversight Committee files (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021732). It details the scrutiny facing then-Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta and prosecutor A. Marie Villafaña regarding the non-prosecution agreement (plea deal) given to Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights a federal judge's ruling that the prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by concealing the deal from victims, and mentions a DOJ probe into potential professional misconduct.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016434.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a report or news article (likely the Miami Herald's investigation) included in House Oversight records. It highlights Alexander Acosta's personal involvement in legal negotiations as the U.S. Attorney in Miami, noting his subsequent position in the Trump Cabinet and consideration for Attorney General. It also references the Miami Herald's analysis of records identifying over 80 victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014369.jpg
This document is page 55 of a Bank of America Merrill Lynch report from the '2016 Future of Financials Conference' held on November 17, 2016. It features a chart on the expected drivers of success for robo-advisors and summarizes a panel discussion on the multifamily real estate market. Panelists John Jardine, David Brickman, and Alan Fishman concluded that the market was on 'solid footing' with risks mainly confined to high-end markets like New York and San Francisco.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014363.jpg
This document summarizes panel discussions from the 2016 Future of Financials Conference. The first section covers equity market structure, with a survey indicating 74% of investors feel it needs revamping, citing issues with liquidity and incentives. The second section discusses the Department of Labor's fiduciary rule, noting that 83% of investors expect it to cause significant changes to the brokerage industry.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014351.jpg
This document from a 2016 conference summarizes investor sentiment on what would increase interest in IVZ (Invesco) stock, with consistent organic growth being the top factor. It also details IVZ's business outlook, including its confidence in achieving 3-5% organic growth, its fixed income exposure, and its position regarding regulatory changes. Additionally, it provides a brief on a presentation by Eaton Vance (EV) executives regarding their performance and the potential impact of tax and regulatory changes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014350.jpg
This document is a page from a Bank of America Merrill Lynch financial research report dated November 17, 2016, summarizing presentations from its 'Future of Financials Conference'. The report analyzes investor sentiment towards Goldman Sachs (GS) stock and details the company's new 'Marcus' consumer lending venture. It also provides key takeaways from a presentation by Loren Starr, CFO of Invesco (IVZ), regarding its growth outlook. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022318.jpg
This document is page 54047 from the Federal Register, dated August 30, 2011, outlining rules and regulations for employers regarding the posting of employee rights notices under the National Labor Relations Act. The text details requirements for physical and electronic posting, language accommodations, and jurisdictional standards based on business revenue. The document contains no explicit mention of Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or related entities; its potential relevance is suggested only by the Bates number "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022318", indicating it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022313.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, containing a dissenting opinion regarding a new rule from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The author argues the rule, which compels employers to post notices of employee rights, is a flawed and unauthorized attempt to increase union density. The document also details the Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis, which estimates a minimal compliance cost for businesses, a figure contested by industry commenters. The content of this specific document does not pertain to Jeffrey Epstein or related matters.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022312.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register, dated August 30, 2011, containing a dissenting opinion regarding a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) proposed rule. The author argues that the Board majority's plan to mandate the posting of employee rights notices is based on insufficient evidence and is therefore 'arbitrary and capricious'. The document is related to U.S. labor law and has no connection to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022309.jpg
This document is a dissenting opinion from a Federal Register publication, arguing that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) lacks the statutory authority to require employers to post notices of employee rights. The author contends that unlike other labor laws where Congress explicitly mandated such postings, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) contains no such provision, and the Board's attempt to create one is an overreach of its authority.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022303.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register, dated August 30, 2011, in which the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) justifies its rule that an employer's failure to post a notice of employee rights is an unfair labor practice. The Board refutes arguments from various business and legal organizations that it is overstepping its authority, citing Supreme Court precedent for its interpretive flexibility and drawing parallels to similar notice requirements under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). The document is part of a legal and administrative record and is unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022301.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing a final rule from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on posting employee rights notices. It discusses the Board's decisions on public comments concerning electronic posting methods, compliance with Department of Labor rules, and exemptions for certain employers. The document has no discernible connection to Jeffrey Epstein; its content is strictly related to U.S. labor law and regulatory procedure, and the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022301' likely indicates it was collected as an exhibit for a congressional committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022299.jpg
This document from the Federal Register details the Board's response to public comments on a proposed rule requiring employers to post a notice of employee rights. The Board addresses concerns about enforcement, application to remote and dispersed workforces, the 11x17-inch poster size, and language requirements for non-English speaking employees. Ultimately, the Board retains most of the proposed rule, including the poster size and language requirements, but removes the mandate for color printing to reduce employer costs.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity