This document is a page from a court summation in which the speaker, likely a prosecutor, argues why a victim named Jane took a long time to disclose sexual abuse. The speaker cites expert testimony from Dr. Rocchio, who explained that victims are less likely to report abuse when the perpetrator is close to them, and points to Jane's close relationships with Maxwell (like a "big sister") and Epstein (a "godfather"). The text also recounts testimony from a witness, Matt, about Jane confronting her mother years later, stating that money she received was "not free."
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe |
Mentioned in the header under "Summations," likely the person speaking.
|
|
| Dr. Rocchio | Expert |
Provided expert testimony at the trial regarding trauma from sexual abuse and the commonality of delayed disclosure b...
|
| Maxwell |
Described as being "like a big sister to Jane," implying a close relationship that made it difficult for Jane to disc...
|
|
| Jane | Victim |
A central figure in the testimony, described as a victim of abuse who had close relationships with Maxwell and Epstein.
|
| Epstein | Godfather (so-called) |
Described as "Jane's so-called godfather," implying a close relationship that made it difficult for Jane to disclose ...
|
| Matt | Witness |
Testified that he was present when Jane confronted her mother years later about money not being free.
|
| Jane's mother | Mother |
Mentioned as being confronted by Jane about money and her knowledge of the situation.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
"the money was not free, and that there was no way she couldn't have known that it wasn't free."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,522 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document