EFTA00035041.pdf

25.7 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
4
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Internal email / correspondence
File Size: 25.7 KB
Summary

This document is an internal correspondence from a staff member at MCC New York questioning management about 'preferential treatment' for a specific SHU inmate (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein). The sender notes deviations from standard protocol, specifically that the inmate is receiving hot meals delivered to the Attorney Conference room rather than standard bagged lunches, and is allowed hourly unrestrained restroom escorts.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Redacted Sender MCC Staff Member
Author of the email questioning management decisions regarding inmate treatment
Inmate (Subject) Inmate
SHU inmate receiving special meals and unrestrained escort privileges (Context suggests Jeffrey Epstein based on docu...
Management Administration
Accused of approving preferential treatment
Serena Williams Athlete
Quoted in the sender's email signature

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
MCC New York
Metropolitan Correctional Center, the facility where the events are taking place
Food Service
Department usually responsible for sending bagged lunches

Timeline (2 events)

Routine delivery of meals from housing unit to Attorney Conference for a specific inmate
MCC New York Attorney Conference Room
Inmate Staff
Hourly unrestrained restroom escorts
MCC New York
Inmate Guards/Staff

Locations (4)

Location Context
Facility address
Location where the inmate is spending time and receiving meals
SHU
Special Housing Unit
Source of the special meals

Relationships (1)

MCC Staff (Sender) Subordinate/Superior MCC Management
Sender asking for confirmation of instructions given by management.

Key Quotes (3)

"If not, this is clear preferential treatment of an inmate."
Source
EFTA00035041.pdf
Quote #1
"Additionally, is it correct that management has instructed that the inmate be escorted to the restroom every hour without being restrained, despite being a SHU inmate?"
Source
EFTA00035041.pdf
Quote #2
"I would like to confirm the accuracy that management has approved that the above inmate's meals be delivered from the housing unit, for every feeding, to Attorney Conference?"
Source
EFTA00035041.pdf
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (809 characters)

Good Morning:
I would like to confirm the accuracy that management has approved that the above inmate's meals be delivered from the housing unit, for every feeding, to Attorney Conference?
Additionally, is it correct that management has instructed that the inmate be escorted to the restroom every hour without being restrained, despite being a SHU inmate?
Has the process changed for all inmates? If not, this is clear preferential treatment of an inmate. All other inmates who are in attorney conference or attending court during feeding, are provided a bagged lunch which is sent up from food service every morning.
Please provide a response.
Thank You,
"I don't cheat to win, I'd rather lose." - Serena Williams
[REDACTED]
MCC New York
150 Park Row
New York, New York 10007
[REDACTED]
EFTA00035041

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document