DOJ-OGR-00001812.jpg

950 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal correspondence (government letter to court)
File Size: 950 KB
Summary

This is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government refutes defense accusations of abandoning discovery deadlines, noting they have already produced 350,000 pages and are preparing to release 1.2 million documents from devices seized from Jeffrey Epstein's residences. The letter also addresses complaints regarding the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) and asserts compliance with the Court's July 15, 2020 scheduling order.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Recipient of the letter; United States District Court Judge.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Defendant in the referenced case (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Jeffrey Epstein Associate/Source of Evidence
Deceased; mentioned as the source of devices seized from his residences, yielding 1.2 million documents for discovery.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
U.S. Department of Justice
Government agency prosecuting the case.
United States Attorney Southern District of New York
Specific office handling the prosecution.
United States District Court Southern District of New York
Court presiding over the case.
Metropolitan Detention Center
Referred to as 'MDC'; subject of defense complaints addressed in the letter.

Timeline (3 events)

2020-07-15
Court Order regarding schedule
Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan
2020-08-21
Deadline for initial non-electronic discovery production
N/A
U.S. Government
2020-11-09
Discovery Deadline
Court
U.S. Government Defense Counsel

Locations (3)

Location Context
Address of the U.S. Attorney SDNY.
Address of the Court/Judge Nathan.
Locations where devices were seized.

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Co-conspirator/Associate (implied) Jeffrey Epstein
Documents from Epstein's seized devices are being used in discovery for Maxwell's trial.
U.S. Government Adversarial Ghislaine Maxwell
Prosecution vs. Defendant in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.

Key Quotes (4)

"The Government is preparing to make additional productions, including a production of electronic discovery, which will consist of over 1.2 million documents from devices seized from Jeffrey Epstein’s residences."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001812.jpg
Quote #1
"The Government... has produced considerable Rule 16 discovery to the defense, which, to date, consists of more than 350,000 pages."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001812.jpg
Quote #2
"For all of its innuendo and accusations, the Defense Letter is at base an effort to preview again motions that the Court has already found to be premature..."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001812.jpg
Quote #3
"Contrary to the defense’s assertions, that discovery does include both '[c]orroborating [i]nformation' regarding the conduct charged in this case as well as potentially '[e]xculpatory [e]vidence,'..."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001812.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,891 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 67 Filed 10/30/20 Page 1 of 4
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
New York, New York 10007
October 30, 2020
BY ECF
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the defense letter dated October 23, 2020 in the above-referenced case (the “Defense Letter”). For all of its innuendo and accusations, the Defense Letter is at base an effort to preview again motions that the Court has already found to be premature, and to cast the Government’s efforts to be transparent with the Court and the defense in a nefarious and deeply misleading light. The Government writes to correct the inaccuracies in the Defense Letter, to update the Court regarding the status of the Government’s ongoing discovery productions, and to address the defense complaints regarding the Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”).
1. The Government Has and Will Continue to Satisfy Its Discovery Obligations
The Defense Letter raises numerous accusations, including that the Government has “abandon[ed]” the discovery deadlines in this case. (Def. Ltr. 1). The Government strongly disagrees, and notes that it has produced considerable Rule 16 discovery to the defense, which, to date, consists of more than 350,000 pages. Contrary to the defense’s assertions, that discovery does include both “[c]orroborating [i]nformation” regarding the conduct charged in this case as well as potentially “[e]xculpatory [e]vidence,” (Def. Ltr. 3), and the Government remains available to discuss that material with defense counsel. Moreover, in anticipation of the November 9, 2020 discovery deadline, the Government is preparing to make additional productions, including a production of electronic discovery, which will consist of over 1.2 million documents from devices seized from Jeffrey Epstein’s residences.1 In that regard, the Government is currently waiting on
1 Despite the defense’s insinuations to the contrary, this is entirely consistent with the schedule ordered by the Court. Specifically, the Court ordered the Government to produce “[i]nitial non-electronic discovery, generally to include search warrant applications and subpoena returns” by August 21, 2020, and the Government made three productions containing those materials, and more, by August 21, 2020. (Order dated July 15, 2020, Dkt. No. 25). It is the Government’s expectation that its upcoming productions will substantially complete its production of Rule 16 discovery. As is not uncommon in a case of this magnitude, however, it is possible that the
DOJ-OGR-00001812

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document