residences
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00028646.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser; Haddon, Morgan & Foreman) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery production disputes in Spring 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties Maxwell faced in reviewing digital evidence at the MDC prison (specifically reading disks vs. hard drives), missing attachments for over 109,000 emails, and metadata discrepancies for 'carved' or deleted files recovered from Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The correspondence details the logistical back-and-forth regarding file formats, USAfx transfers, and the potential need for judicial intervention (Judge Nathan) to force the MDC to accept specific hard drives.
EFTA00021720.pdf
This document contains a series of emails from January 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the DOJ Attaché at the US Embassy in Paris. They discuss the ongoing French investigation into Jean-Luc Brunel, who was in custody at the time. Key topics include the French authorities' request for evidence from the Epstein investigation (specifically photos and database records using facial recognition), the drafting of Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) requests, and the French judiciary's insistence on reciprocity before sharing their own evidence with the US. The emails also mention the existence of photos of Brunel within seized Epstein evidence and the potential cooperation of two adult victims abused in Paris.
EFTA00020430.pdf
This document contains an email chain from March 29, 2021, between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Christian Everdell, and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence details technical disputes regarding discovery materials, specifically the defense's inability to provide a hard drive to Maxwell in prison (MDC), issues with unreadable disks, missing email attachments, and discrepancies in metadata for over 110,000 files seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The prosecution explains that some metadata is missing because files were 'carved or deleted' and offers solutions for transferring missing files.
EFTA00020426.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes. The defense raises seven specific issues, including the inability of Maxwell to view files on prison computers, missing email attachments (over 109,000), metadata discrepancies suggesting files were created/modified after seizure, and gaps in Bates numbering. The prosecution responds by explaining technical limitations with the MDC (prison), asserting that metadata reflects the state of files upon FBI seizure or carving, and clarifying that certain images came from physical CDs seized from Epstein's residences in 2019 rather than electronic extractions.
EFTA00002481.pdf
This document is an evidentiary photograph of a framed collage containing five smaller snapshots. The most notable photograph (top right) depicts Jeffrey Epstein standing at a podium with the seal of 'THE WHITE HOUSE' visible behind him, alongside a female associate whose face is redacted. The other four photographs show various individuals, likely females, in domestic settings or interiors, all with their faces redacted. The document bears the identification number EFTA00002481.
DOJ-OGR-00001812.jpg
This is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government refutes defense accusations of abandoning discovery deadlines, noting they have already produced 350,000 pages and are preparing to release 1.2 million documents from devices seized from Jeffrey Epstein's residences. The letter also addresses complaints regarding the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) and asserts compliance with the Court's July 15, 2020 scheduling order.
DOJ-OGR-00000413.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) dated July 16, 2019, in which the government argues that the defendant (Jeffrey Epstein) poses a significant flight risk. The prosecutor highlights that new victims have come forward post-charge, the defendant faces life in prison, and possesses vast wealth including six residences (one abroad). The government emphasizes they kept the investigation covert specifically to prevent the defendant from fleeing.
DOJ-OGR-00019043.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony confirms that Sarah Kellen became Jeffrey Epstein's primary assistant in late 2001. It details her responsibilities, which included coordinating flight schedules with Larry Visoski and arranging luggage transfers to and from various residences.
DOJ-OGR-00002166.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing detailing the background of an indictment against an unnamed defendant. It alleges that between 1994 and 1997, the defendant conspired with Jeffrey Epstein to facilitate the sexual abuse of minors by identifying, enticing, and grooming them. The document lists the specific charges, which include conspiracy, enticement of a minor, transportation of minors for illegal sex acts, and perjury for lying in a civil deposition.
DOJ-OGR-00019102.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning establishes that an unnamed woman had extensive responsibilities managing properties and planes for an unnamed man. Her duties included managing on-site staff, overseeing repairs and renovations, purchasing items like furniture, and decorating both the residences and the aircraft, a role described as a "very big" job.
DOJ-OGR-00016533.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Espinosa - direct testimony). The witness describes the logistical preparations required before Jeffrey Epstein traveled to his various properties, specifically noting that fresh bread and butter from New York had to be flown in to stock the houses. The witness identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the person responsible for supervising these logistics and confirms that they assisted her. The testimony concludes with the introduction of the name Emmy Taylor.
DOJ-OGR-00016529.jpg
This document is page 46 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa testifies that Ghislaine Maxwell's role was strictly that of an 'estate manager' who ran Jeffrey Epstein's properties, distinct from the finance staff and attorneys who handled money and business affairs. Espinosa confirms assisting Maxwell with daily tasks, which included making reservations and handling lists of 25 to 50 items per day.
DOJ-OGR-00013522.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on the witness's perception of the relationship between Ghislaine and Epstein, establishing that their personal/romantic relationship ended in the 1990s and that Ghislaine's role in Epstein's life and business affairs diminished during the 2000s.
DOJ-OGR-00011747.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of witness Mr. Visoski by Ms. Comey, focusing on Ghislaine Maxwell's role as household manager for Jeffrey Epstein between 1994 and 2004. Visoski also describes the evolution of communication technology used by Epstein's staff, transitioning from pagers in the early 1990s to cellphones later in the decade.
DOJ-OGR-00017491.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony establishes that Ghislaine Maxwell had a significant managerial and supervisory role over household staff, including the house manager, and was the primary person responsible for resolving problems. The witness also confirms Maxwell's role in overseeing repairs, renovations, decorating, and acting as a shopper for Epstein's residences.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018046.jpg
This document is a detailed itinerary or schedule listing events taking place in New York City, specifically focused on Fashion Week presentations for the Spring/Summer 2011 collections (implying the document dates to September 2010). It lists specific times, locations, and contact information for shows by Norman Ambrose, Yuna Yang, Lacoste, and Cynthia Rowley, as well as a Showtime Networks promotional event and concerts by the September Concert Foundation. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021189.jpg
These pages (89-90) appear to be from a manuscript or memoir draft by Virginia Giuffre (indicated by Bates stamp and context). The text details her grooming by Jeffrey Epstein, describing how he transformed her appearance and used her as a 'personal toy' and for 'massages with benefits.' It outlines Epstein's method of entrapment and blackmail involving powerful figures ('members of parliament', 'celebrities') and mentions her time spent at his ranch in Santa Fe as a temporary escape.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity