This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between counsel (Mr. Everdell, Mr. Rohrbach) and the judge (THE COURT) about editing the language in a document related to transportation. The parties agree to amend a phrase, and the judge, acting on a suggestion from the court clerk, decides to simply cut the words "or foreign" to leave the phrase as "transporting an individual in interstate commerce."
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Counsel |
Speaking in a court proceeding, proposing edits to a document and addressing the court.
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Counsel |
Speaking in a court proceeding, stating "No objection" to a proposed edit.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the proceeding, making decisions on document edits, and referencing a point made by their clerk.
|
| Clerk | Court Clerk |
Mentioned by THE COURT as having made a "good point" regarding how to edit a quote.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the phrase "between the United States and a foreign country" which is being discussed for elimination fr...
|
""from one state to another or between the United States and a foreign country," so we should eliminate "or between the United States and a foreign country.""Source
"My clerk makes a good point. We should just cut "or foreign" in that quote, not do ellipses, because I'm just quoting myself."Source
"So line 6 is just "transporting an individual in interstate commerce.""Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,373 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document