District Court Clerk
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A discussion between attorneys and a judge regarding the finalization of jury instructions. Speci... | Courtroom in the Southern D... | View |
| 2022-03-02 | N/A | Deleted Document Event | SDNY | View |
EFTA00016741.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 16, 2019, between members of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The team is finalizing a detention submission letter regarding 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein), evidenced by the attachment filename. A critical email reveals that an Assistant United States Attorney contacted the Judge's chambers and was informed by the clerk that the Judge refused to view photographs without explanation, leading the prosecution to exclude them from the submission.
DOJ-OGR-00021907.jpg
This is a formal letter from the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States, dated April 14, 2025, to the Clerk of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The letter confirms the filing and docketing of a petition for a writ of certiorari for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States. It specifies the petition was filed on April 10, 2025, and assigned the Supreme Court docket number 24-1073 on April 14, 2025.
DOJ-OGR-00021787.jpg
This document is a legal notice (NOTICE TO THE BAR) from Case 22-1426, dated 02/29/2024, outlining procedures for obtaining audio recordings of oral arguments and arranging court reporters or interpreter services. It details how to purchase argument CDs for $34 and the requirements for providing written notice and consent for court reporters or interpreter services at least one week prior to a hearing or oral argument. The document serves to inform legal professionals about these administrative processes within the court system.
DOJ-OGR-00016971.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding filed on August 10, 2022, where attorneys Mr. Everdell and Mr. Rohrbach discuss jury instructions with the judge. Key points include a request to substitute a 'Miller charge', a modification to specify a count relates 'solely to Carolyn', and a court clerk's observation about the word 'Minor' in the heading of Count Six. The document captures the procedural process of finalizing legal instructions for a jury.
DOJ-OGR-00016968.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between counsel (Mr. Everdell, Mr. Rohrbach) and the judge (THE COURT) about editing the language in a document related to transportation. The parties agree to amend a phrase, and the judge, acting on a suggestion from the court clerk, decides to simply cut the words "or foreign" to leave the phrase as "transporting an individual in interstate commerce."
DOJ-OGR-00033127.jpg
This document is a concordance (word index) page from a legal deposition or transcript produced by Consor & Associates. It lists words alphabetically from 'cases' to 'Country' alongside their page and line numbers in the source transcript. Key terms include 'Connolly' (referenced multiple times), 'civil', 'complaint', 'coaching', and 'CF09454AXX' (likely a case number). The document is part of a Public Records Request (No. 17-295) processed by the DOJ.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015185.jpg
This page appears to be an excerpt from a manuscript or creative writing piece included in the House Oversight evidence files (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015185). It contains a narrative description of two street characters, 'The Mime' and 'The Pacer,' set in Los Angeles locations including Hollywood and Vine. The text explores the nature of the Mime's work and his interaction with an unemployment clerk.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021870.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a legal proceeding or interview. The speaker describes the procedural history of a 2007/2008 legal challenge (Case 9:08-CV-80736) aimed at invalidating the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the U.S. Government and Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker notes that the NPA provided immunity not just to Epstein, but to 'four named women' and other potential co-conspirators regarding federal sex crimes involving minors.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Requester | District Court Clerk | $34.00 | Standard fee mentioned in text: Cost per CD for... | View |
Request for audio recording CD
Request for an audio recording CD of an argument, including case name, docket number, and date of oral argument.
Request for audio recording CD
Request for an audio recording CD of an argument, including case name, docket number, and date of oral argument.
Request for CD of argument
Request must include case name, docket number, and date of oral argument.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity