HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026900.jpg
2.37 MB
Extraction Summary
5
People
4
Organizations
8
Locations
4
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Financial market analysis / geopolitical risk report
File Size:
2.37 MB
Summary
This document is a financial market commentary titled 'Unsteady Undertow,' likely produced in October 2018. It analyzes geopolitical risks affecting US equities, specifically citing the disappearance of a Saudi journalist, impending Iran sanctions, elections in Mexico (AMLO) and Brazil (Bolsonaro), the USMCA trade agreement, and trade wars with China and the EU. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026900).
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Andrés Manuel Lopes Obrador | President-elect of Mexico |
Referred to as AMLO; described as left-of-center populist.
|
| Jair Bolsonaro | Presidential Candidate (Brazil) |
Described as law-and-order former army captain; strong showing in first round of elections.
|
| Jean-Claude Juncker | European Commission President |
Made a deal with President Trump in July 2018 regarding tariffs.
|
| Donald Trump | US President |
Referred to as President Trump; made deal with Juncker; involved in trade friction.
|
| Jamal Khashoggi | Saudi Journalist |
Implicitly referred to as the 'recent disappearance of a Saudi journalist'.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| US Congress |
Mentioned regarding ratification of USMCA and mid-term elections.
|
|
| European Commission |
Represented by President Juncker.
|
|
| Worker's Party |
Brazilian political party mentioned as the opposition to Bolsonaro.
|
|
| European Union |
Partner in trade friction discussions with the US.
|
Timeline (4 events)
July 2018
October 2018
Disappearance of a Saudi journalist (implied context for date estimation).
Saudi Arabia / Turkey (implied)
October 7, 2018
Locations (8)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Central focus of economic analysis (US equities, US sanctions).
|
|
|
Mentioned in context of journalist disappearance and oil tensions.
|
|
|
Target of impending US sanctions impacting oil supply.
|
|
|
Discussed regarding elections and NAFTA/USMCA.
|
|
|
Discussed regarding elections and currency (Brazilian real).
|
|
|
Party to the revised NAFTA/USMCA deal.
|
|
|
Discussed regarding escalating trade war and 'Made in China 2025'.
|
|
|
Discussed regarding trade friction.
|
Relationships (1)
July 2018 deal between European Commission President Juncker and President Trump
Key Quotes (4)
"Potential US retaliation over the recent disappearance of a Saudi journalist has only added fuel to the fire of worries given the risk that oil exports could be used as a political weapon"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026900.jpg
Quote #1
"we believe that the net impact of these shifts is not material enough to derail the US economic expansion or bull market"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026900.jpg
Quote #2
"work together toward zero tariffs, zero non-tariff barriers and zero subsidies on non-auto industrial goods"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026900.jpg
Quote #3
"Made in China 2025 policies which harm US companies"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026900.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,948 characters)
Unsteady Undertow
As market observers attempt to explain the recent drop in US equities, the risks of geopolitical factors have garnered considerable attention. Potential US retaliation over the recent disappearance of a Saudi journalist has only added fuel to the fire of worries given the risk that oil exports could be used as a political weapon in a world with tighter oil supply thanks to impending US sanctions on Iran.
As we review the geopolitical developments of 2018, it is clear that some of the risks have abated while others have increased. With the exception of a significant spike in oil prices due to the impact of sanctions on Iran or any escalation in US-Saudi tensions, we believe that the net impact of these shifts is not material enough to derail the US economic expansion or bull market.
Risks that have abated
Mexico: the election of the left-of-center populist president (Andrés Manuel Lopes Obrador referred to as AMLO) has reduced fear of a reversal of recent reforms. While concerns about fiscal profligacy and reverting to a nationalist energy policy that reduces oil production may reappear, AMLO does not take office until the end of the year.
Brazil: The strong showing of Jair Bolsonaro, a law-and-order former army captain, in the first round of elections and the latest data that points to a 75% probability of Bolsonaro becoming the next president of Brazil has provided a boost to the Brazilian real. His current standing has substantially reduced the election of another left-wing worker’s party candidate who would keep the status quo in Brazil.
NAFTA: The agreement on a revised NAFTA deal between the US, Canada, and Mexico on September 30th meaningfully reduced the risk of the US withdrawal from NAFTA. While the new agreement, US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), has not been ratified by the Mexican and Canadian national parliaments nor by the US congress, and a divided congress after the mid-term elections may lead to some uncertainty, we believe it is likely to be ratified.
US-EU Trade Friction: Tension between the US and European Union eased significantly after a July 2018 deal between European Commission President Juncker and President Trump to “work together toward zero tariffs, zero non-tariff barriers and zero subsidies on non-auto industrial goods”. The coast is not totally clear given the threat of auto tariffs, but we do not anticipate any significant increase in trade rhetoric in the near future.
Risks that have increased
China: The trade war with China continues to escalate and as we have stated before, we believe that it cannot be resolved simply by China importing more US goods. The issues range from:
• A large and growing trade deficit with China
• Industrial policies & unfair trade practices that reduce competition, such as subsidies and “dumping good at below-market prices”
• “Made in China 2025” policies which “harm US companies”
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026900
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document