This document is a slide from a Goldman Sachs Investment Management Division presentation dated around July 2017. It analyzes the legal and regulatory status of cryptocurrencies across various nations (Switzerland, Singapore, Japan, UK, US, Russia, China). The document bears a Bates stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025685), indicating it was produced as part of a US House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to financial practices, though no specific individuals (like Epstein) are named on this specific page.
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Goldman Sachs |
Investment Management Division
|
|
| Investment Strategy Group |
Listed as a source for the data
|
|
| Autonomous NEXT |
Provided data for #Token Mania
|
|
| FINMA |
Key Regulator for Switzerland
|
|
| Monetary Authority of Singapore |
Key Regulator for Singapore
|
|
| Financial Services Agency |
Key Regulator for Japan
|
|
| Financial Conduct Authority |
Key Regulator for United Kingdom
|
|
| SEC |
Key Regulator for United States (Securities and Exchange Commission)
|
|
| CFTC |
Key Regulator for United States (Commodity Futures Trading Commission)
|
|
| OCC |
Key Regulator for United States (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency)
|
|
| IRS |
United States tax authority treating crypto as property
|
|
| Central Bank of Russia |
Key Regulator for Russia
|
|
| People’s Bank of China |
Key Regulator for China
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
"The cryptocurrency world operates across geographic and jurisdictional borders, creating ambiguity as to its legal status."Source
"Individual countries have taken differing views on cryptocurrencies."Source
"Exchanges, however, are not required to create 1099s."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,322 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document