| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bodmer
|
Citizenship |
1
|
1 |
This document is a heavily redacted version of Jeffrey Epstein's 'Black Book' (contact list) from approximately 2004-2005. It contains an alphabetical listing of high-profile individuals, politicians, celebrities, and business associates, along with sections for specific locations (Palm Beach, NY, Paris, etc.) and services (Massage, Medical, Aviation). The final page contains significant handwritten notes identifying key witnesses, staff members (chefs, drivers), and specific allegations regarding the procurement of women ('Scout for young females') and interactions with underage girls.
This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated February 13, 2020. It summarizes various legal news stories, including the Roger Stone sentencing, fraud cases involving Theranos and Air Charter Co., and investigations into university funding. A specific article highlights a defamation dispute between attorneys David Boies and Alan Dershowitz, centering on Boies' remarks regarding Dershowitz's alleged connections to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a New York Law360 newsletter email dated November 21, 2018. It summarizes various legal news stories, including a forgery suit against Greenberg Traurig, a doping settlement involving Vijay Singh, and the sentencing of lawyers John Chambers and Michael Little. The document is likely included in the dataset due to a keyword hit for 'Epstein Becker & Green, PC' (a law firm) in the job listings section on the last page; it does not appear to reference Jeffrey Epstein personally.
This document is an evidence photograph (marked EFTA00021575) displaying the contents of a safe or personal effects, specifically a leather wallet sorted for 'Francs', 'Various', and 'Dollars', along with loose international currency. The currency includes approximately £460 in British Pounds, €500 in Euros, 440 Swedish Kronor, 10 Swiss Francs, and 230 Russian Rubles, alongside three coins and two redacted photographs.
This document appears to be a heavily redacted address book or contact list associated with Jeffrey Epstein. It spans from 2004-2005 and contains an alphabetical listing of names, organizations, and businesses, along with sections for specific locations like "France", "Israel", "Kenya", and categories like "Massage", "Medical", and "Travel". The document includes handwritten notes identifying key individuals, witnesses, and staff members, such as Ghislaine Maxwell, chefs, pilots, and drivers.
This document is a list of professional activities and speaking engagements from 1994 and 1995, likely from a CV. It details conferences, seminars, grand rounds, and workshops with their host organizations and locations across the US, Canada, Europe, and Asia. Key themes include psychology, law, trauma, memory, and sexual abuse.
This is page 50 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on December 10, 2020. The defense counsel is arguing for bail by citing legal precedents (Bodmer and Khashoggi) where foreign citizens with extradition concerns or significant wealth were granted bail. The lawyer argues that denying bail simply because France does not extradite citizens would effectively bar all French citizens from bail in the US.
This legal document is a page from a court's analysis distinguishing the current defendant's case from several cited legal precedents regarding pre-trial detention. The court contrasts cases where defendants were released (Khashoggi, Bodmer) with cases where they were detained (Boustani, Ho, Epstein), focusing on factors that justify detention such as flight risk, substantial financial resources, dual citizenship, and ties to foreign countries without extradition treaties like Brazil.
This document is page 35 of a legal filing (Document 102) dated December 14, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. It contends that her proposed $28.5 million bond package exceeds necessary requirements for ensuring her presence in court. The document features a table comparing Maxwell's proposed bail conditions (including private security and electronic monitoring) to those of other high-profile defendants like Bernie Madoff and Khashoggi, highlighting that her package is stricter than those previously granted release.
This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney is arguing for bail for their client. The attorney cites two legal precedents, the Bodmer case (2004) and the Khashoggi case (1989), to counter the government's position. The argument focuses on the principle that a foreign national's home country's non-extradition policy should not automatically preclude them from being granted bail in the United States.
This document is a page from a Government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) arguing against bail for the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). It highlights her significant flight risk due to access to millions of dollars in foreign accounts (Swiss and English banks), recent large financial transfers into a trust, and the cash purchase of a New Hampshire hideout property. The prosecution argues the proposed $5 million bond is insufficient given her wealth.
This document is page 31 of a court filing (Document 100) from December 18, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text argues against the defendant's release by distinguishing her case from precedents where bail was granted (Khashoggi, Bodmer) and aligning it with cases where detention was upheld due to flight risk and foreign ties (Boustani, Patrick Ho, and a 2001 case United States v. Epstein). The 'United States v. Epstein' cited here refers to a 2001 case from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania involving a defendant with German/Brazilian dual citizenship, used here as legal precedent for denying bail based on lack of extradition treaties.
This document is page 31 of a court filing (Document 100) from December 18, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text presents a legal argument supporting the detention of the defendant by distinguishing her case from previous instances where bail was granted (Khashoggi, Bodmer) and comparing her to cases where detention was upheld due to flight risk and foreign ties (Boustani, Patrick Ho). Notably, it cites a 2001 case, 'United States v. Epstein,' as precedent for denying bail based on dual citizenship and lack of extradition treaties; however, this 2001 citation likely refers to a different defendant named Epstein (in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania) rather than Jeffrey Epstein.
This legal document argues that pre-release waivers of extradition are unenforceable and meaningless because any defendant who flees will inevitably contest the waiver's validity. The author cites numerous court cases, including United States v. Epstein, to support the claim that such waivers are merely an "empty gesture." The document also refutes the defense's counterarguments by distinguishing the specific factual circumstances of the cases they rely upon.
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, argues for the approval of a proposed $28.5 million bail package for defendant Ms. Maxwell. It contends that this package is more than sufficient to ensure her appearance in court by comparing it to the less restrictive bail conditions of other high-profile defendants with significant financial means and foreign citizenships. A table is provided to illustrate these precedents, detailing bond amounts and conditions for defendants such as Madoff, Khashoggi, and others.
This document is an internal record listing various individuals, organizations, and services, predominantly related to travel, aviation, and telecommunications. It includes names of airlines, hotels, financial services, and individuals, with a header indicating that personal contact information has been redacted. The document appears to be a compilation of contacts or service providers.
This page from a legal document analyzes several precedent cases to argue for or against the detention of a defendant pending trial. It distinguishes the current case from others like *Khashoggi* and *Bodmer* where defendants were released, and draws parallels to cases like *Boustani*, *Patrick Ho*, and *Epstein* where defendants were detained. The analysis focuses on factors such as flight risk, financial resources, ties to foreign countries, and the existence of extradition treaties.
This document is page 40 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (indicated by the ISBN in the footer), authored by Edward Jay Epstein. It details Edward Snowden's ideological alignment with Libertarian Ron Paul, his disillusionment with the CIA and NSA, and his rationale for leaking government secrets. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was used as an exhibit in a Congressional investigation.
This document is page 34 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (authored by Edward Jay Epstein, indicated by the ISBN in the footer), bearing a House Oversight Committee stamp. It details Edward Snowden's life while working for Dell in Annapolis, his relationship with Lindsay Mills, and his growing disillusionment with the US intelligence community (NSA/CIA/DIA) prior to his defection to Moscow. It mentions his attendance at a gala with former CIA director Michael Hayden and his alleged complaints to NSA officials regarding surveillance.
This document appears to be page 28 from a book proof (likely by author Edward Jay Epstein, given the filename prefix 'Epst') regarding Edward Snowden. It details Snowden's return from Geneva at age 25, his financial losses in the options market, and his disillusionment with the CIA, specifically citing an incident where the agency compromised a Swiss banker. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional record or investigation.
This document is page 24 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein, based on the filename), included in a House Oversight file dump. It details Edward Snowden's lifestyle and financial activities in 2008, including his use of aliases 'Wolfking Awesomefox' and 'TrueHooHa', significant gambling losses on the stock market, and his angry online outbursts against Ben Bernanke and others on Ars Technica. It connects his personal financial distress to his time working for the CIA on sensitive operations in Switzerland.
This document is page 6 of a report produced by CEFOTAJ, a non-profit organization. It details the geopolitical and economic relationship between the U.S. and Haiti, outlining significant financial aid contributions from the U.S. and World Bank donors between 1995 and 2008. The text analyzes Haiti's economic struggles prior to the 2010 earthquake, citing political instability and corruption, while also noting the country's openness to foreign banking and investment.
This document is page 13 of a financial report (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026146) analyzing a banking institution. It details the bank's loan portfolio by sector for 2015 and 2016, totaling €967 million in 2016, and highlights its operational connections to Paris and Switzerland.
This document is a page from a larger collection of evidence (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026067), containing the conclusion of an email or letter from Johnny el Hachem of Edmond de Rothschild Private Equity. The text describes the success and structure of a fund called 'BRIDGE,' detailing its €390m in European deals and the experience of its London-based team. It highlights the fund's ability to source transactions directly and its innovative approach to infrastructure debt.
This document contains pages 276 and 277 from the book 'Filthy Rich' (likely by James Patterson), stamped as House Oversight evidence. It details Virginia Roberts's allegations against Prince Andrew, including her sworn statement that she was instructed by Jeffrey Epstein to 'exceed' expectations and give the Prince whatever he wanted. The text also covers legal maneuvers, such as Buckingham Palace refusing letters, a Florida judge striking allegations from the record as 'lurid details,' and Barry Krischer refusing to comment on Epstein in 2016.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity