DOJ-OGR-00020438.jpg

1.4 MB

Extraction Summary

7
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
6
Events
3
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 1.4 MB
Summary

This document is a court docket sheet from October 29, 2021, for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists numerous pre-trial motions (motions in limine) filed by Maxwell's defense team, led by attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca, to exclude various pieces of evidence and testimony. These include attempts to suppress identification, preclude expert testimony, prevent references to accusers as "victims," and block testimony about an alleged rape by Jeffrey Epstein. The document also records the prosecution's (USA) responses to these motions and a joint letter from prosecutors to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding redactions.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Filer of multiple motions in limine and subject of filings by the USA.
Jeffrey Pagliuca Attorney
Listed as the filer of several motions on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell.
Jeffrey Epstein
Mentioned in a motion seeking to preclude testimony about an alleged "Rape" by him.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Recipient of a joint letter from AUSAs regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
Alison Moe AUSA
Co-author of a joint letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
Lara Pomerantz AUSA
Co-author of a joint letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
Andrew Rohrbach AUSA
Filer of a response on behalf of the USA and co-author of a joint letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
USA government agency
The prosecution in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filing responses and a joint letter.
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. company
Mentioned in the case citation 'Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993)'.

Timeline (6 events)

2005-10-20
Search of property at 358 El Brillo Way during which items were purportedly seized.
358 El Brillo Way
2021-09-03
A court order is mentioned, which the prosecution alleges the defense failed to comply with, relating to co-conspirator statements.
2021-10-29
Multiple motions in limine filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense.
2021-10-29
RESPONSE in Opposition filed by USA to Ghislaine Maxwell's motions.
2021-10-29
REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.
2021-10-29
JOINT LETTER filed by USA regarding redactions.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of a search on October 20, 2005, from which items were purportedly seized.

Relationships (3)

Ghislaine Maxwell professional Jeffrey Pagliuca
Jeffrey Pagliuca is listed as the filer for multiple motions on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, indicating a client-attorney relationship.
Ghislaine Maxwell association Jeffrey Epstein
A motion was filed to preclude testimony about an alleged "Rape" by Jeffrey Epstein, linking them in the context of the criminal allegations.
USA adversarial Ghislaine Maxwell
The document shows the USA (prosecution) filing responses in opposition to motions filed by Ghislaine Maxwell (defendant) in a criminal case.

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,428 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page52 of 91
10/29/2021 | 392 | MOTION in Limine to Suppress Identification. Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/29/2021)
-- | -- | --
10/29/2021 | 393 | MOTION in Limine to Preclude Law Enforcement Witnesses from Offering Expert Opinion Testimony. Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/29/2021)
10/29/2021 | 394 | MOTION in Limine to Preclude Testimony About Any Alleged "Rape" by Jeffrey Epstein. Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/29/2021)
10/29/2021 | 395 | MOTION in Limine to Preclude Reference to the Accusers as "Victims" or "Minor Victims". Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/29/2021)
10/29/2021 | 396 | MOTION in Limine to Preclude Introduction of Government's Exhibits 251, 288, 294, 313 and 606. Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/29/2021)
10/29/2021 | 397 | RESPONSE in Opposition by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 386 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and Request for Daubert Hearing., 396 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Introduction of Government's Exhibits 251, 288, 294, 313 and 606., 390 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Government Exhibit 52, an Unauthenticated Hearsay Document from Suspect Sources., 389 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged False Statement Evidence., 388 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Flight., 387 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence Related to Accuser–3., 384 MOTION in Limine to Preclude the Introduction of Alleged Co–Conspirator Statements as a Sanction for Failing to Comply with This Court's September 3, 2021 Order., 395 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Reference to the Accusers as "Victims" or "Minor Victims"., 385 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Any Evidence Offered by the Government Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) for Failure to Comply with the Rule's Notice Requirement., 394 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Testimony About Any Alleged "Rape" by Jeffrey Epstein., 391 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Items Purportedly Seized During Search of 358 El Brillo Way on October 20, 2005., 392 MOTION in Limine to Suppress Identification., 393 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Law Enforcement Witnesses from Offering Expert Opinion Testimony. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 10/29/2021)
10/29/2021 | 398 | REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Ghislaine Maxwell re 386 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and Request for Daubert Hearing., 396 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Introduction of Government's Exhibits 251, 288, 294, 313 and 606., 390 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Government Exhibit 52, an Unauthenticated Hearsay Document from Suspect Sources., 389 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged False Statement Evidence., 388 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Flight., 387 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence Related to Accuser–3., 384 MOTION in Limine to Preclude the Introduction of Alleged Co–Conspirator Statements as a Sanction for Failing to Comply with This Court's September 3, 2021 Order., 395 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Reference to the Accusers as "Victims" or "Minor Victims"., 385 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Any Evidence Offered by the Government Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) for Failure to Comply with the Rule's Notice Requirement., 394 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Testimony About Any Alleged "Rape" by Jeffrey Epstein., 391 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Items Purportedly Seized During Search of 358 El Brillo Way on October 20, 2005., 392 MOTION in Limine to Suppress Identification., 393 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Law Enforcement Witnesses from Offering Expert Opinion Testimony. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/29/2021)
10/29/2021 | 399 | JOINT LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated Oct. 28, 2021 re: Justifications for redactions Document filed by USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 10/29/2021)
DOJ-OGR-00020438

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document