You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
DOJ-OGR-00013864.jpg
544 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
544 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on August 10, 2022. The judge provides guidance on witness testimony, confirms the preclusion of testimony from Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards, and addresses a government objection to admitting a 1996 sale agreement for a London property as evidence. The discussion involves several attorneys, including Mr. Pagliuca, Mr. Rohrbach, and Mr. Everdell.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Glassman | Witness |
Mentioned in the context of his testimony potentially impeaching Jane.
|
| Jane |
Mentioned as a person who could be impeached by Mr. Glassman's testimony.
|
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, identified as being from the government.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, asking for clarification on the preclusion of testimony.
|
| Mr. Scarola | Witness |
His testimony is being precluded by the court.
|
| Mr. Edwards | Witness |
His testimony is being precluded by the court.
|
| The Court | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, making rulings and guiding the proceedings.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, confirming an exhibit has a trial mark.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
1996
A sale agreement was made for the defendant's house in London.
44 Kinnerton Street, London
defendant
2022-08-10
A court proceeding where the judge issued guidance on witness testimony, precluded testimony from two witnesses (Scarola and Edwards), and discussed a government objection to an exhibit.
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the defendant's home mentioned in a sale agreement.
|
|
|
The address of the defendant's home in London.
|
Relationships (3)
Mr. Pagliuca, an attorney, is addressing the Court (the judge) to seek clarification on a ruling during a legal proceeding.
Mr. Rohrbach, an attorney for the government, is addressing the Court during a legal proceeding.
Mr. Everdell, an attorney, is responding to a direct question from the Court about an exhibit.
Key Quotes (3)
"You're precluding testimony from Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Seeking clarification from the judge on a ruling about witness testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00013864.jpg
Quote #1
"Yes, on the 401/403 grounds."Source
— THE COURT
(Confirming the preclusion of testimony and stating the legal grounds for the decision.)
DOJ-OGR-00013864.jpg
Quote #2
"There's a government objection to preclude, pursuant to Rule 16, an exhibit that I gather purports to be a sale agreement for the defendant's home in -- house in London at 44 Kinnerton Street dated 1996."Source
— THE COURT
(Describing an objection from the government regarding a piece of evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00013864.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,251 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 5 of 246 2300
LCGVMAX1
LCGVMAX1
inference, the jury could find that Mr. Glassman's testimony
tends to impeach Jane either as to motive to testify or
impeachment by contradiction or both. So that is my guidance
on the issue of the attorney -- the witness attorney testimony.
Any questions?
MR. ROHRBACH: None from the government, your Honor.
MR. PAGLIUCA: I just want to be clear, your Honor.
You're precluding testimony from Mr. Scarola and
Mr. Edwards.
THE COURT: Yes.
MR. PAGLIUCA: The only reason I'm asking that
question is we can release them and not have them appear.
THE COURT: Yes, on the 401/403 grounds.
MR. PAGLIUCA: Understood.
And that may speed things up a little bit here, since
we're releasing a couple of witnesses.
THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.
All right. Making progress.
There's a government objection to preclude, pursuant
to Rule 16, an exhibit that I gather purports to be a sale
agreement for the defendant's home in -- house in London at 44
Kinnerton Street dated 1996. Does that have a trial mark for
identification, that exhibit?
MR. EVERDELL: It does now, I believe, your Honor.
THE COURT: Okay. Just in time.
tends to impeach Jane either as to motive to testify or
impeachment by contradiction or both. So that is my guidance
on the issue of the attorney -- the witness attorney testimony.
Any questions?
MR. ROHRBACH: None from the government, your Honor.
MR. PAGLIUCA: I just want to be clear, your Honor.
You're precluding testimony from Mr. Scarola and
Mr. Edwards.
THE COURT: Yes.
MR. PAGLIUCA: The only reason I'm asking that
question is we can release them and not have them appear.
THE COURT: Yes, on the 401/403 grounds.
MR. PAGLIUCA: Understood.
And that may speed things up a little bit here, since
we're releasing a couple of witnesses.
THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.
All right. Making progress.
There's a government objection to preclude, pursuant
to Rule 16, an exhibit that I gather purports to be a sale
agreement for the defendant's home in -- house in London at 44
Kinnerton Street dated 1996. Does that have a trial mark for
identification, that exhibit?
MR. EVERDELL: It does now, I believe, your Honor.
THE COURT: Okay. Just in time.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013864
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document