DOJ-OGR-00001020.jpg
582 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
6
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
582 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, detailing a discussion between the judge, defense counsel (Mr. Cohen), and government counsel (Ms. Moe) about establishing a schedule for motions and discovery. Mr. Cohen clarifies the schedule by adding a previously omitted August 21 deadline for search warrant applications, which Ms. Moe confirms was included in a prior email to the judge's chambers. The parties are working to finalize deadlines for various legal filings in the case.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Cohen | Counsel |
Speaker in the court transcript, likely representing the defense, discussing a proposed motion schedule with the court.
|
| Ms. Moe | Counsel |
Speaker in the court transcript, likely representing the government, discussing a proposed motion schedule with the c...
|
| The Court | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, presiding over the hearing and asking questions about the proposed schedule. Referre...
|
| Your Honor's law clerk | Law Clerk |
Mentioned as the recipient of an e-mail regarding the case schedule.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in the legal case, responsible for discovery and responding to defense motions.
|
Timeline (6 events)
this year-08-21
Deadline for production of search warrant applications and the subpoena returns.
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'
|
|
|
Mentioned as the destination for an e-mail regarding the case schedule.
|
Relationships (3)
They are opposing counsels in a legal proceeding, discussing a case schedule before a judge. They address each other as 'counsel'.
Mr. Cohen is an attorney arguing before the judge ('The Court' / 'Your Honor') in a formal court setting.
Key Quotes (3)
"Mr. Cohen, based on the government's description of both the quantity and quality of discovery, is that schedule that's been laid out sufficient from your perspective to do everything that you need to do?"Source
— THE COURT
(The judge asking the defense counsel if the proposed schedule is adequate.)
DOJ-OGR-00001020.jpg
Quote #1
"I think counsel for the government did not mention in the e-mail we had sent to your Honor's law clerk that August 21 would be the deadline for production of search warrant applications and the subpoena returns."Source
— MR. COHEN
(Clarifying an omission from the proposed schedule for the official record.)
DOJ-OGR-00001020.jpg
Quote #2
"That's correct, your Honor. I apologize. We did include that in the e-mail to your Honor's chambers, and that is correct."Source
— MS. MOE
(Confirming Mr. Cohen's clarification and apologizing for the omission in her oral statement.)
DOJ-OGR-00001020.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,466 characters)
Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page79 of 200
16
k7e2MaxC kjc
16
k7e2MaxC kjc
include electronic materials, to be due by Monday, November 9
of this year, and following that we would propose the following
motion schedule: that defense motions be due by Monday,
December 21 of this year; that the government's response be due
on Friday, January 22, 2021; and that replies be due on Friday,
February 5, 2021.
THE COURT: All right. Mr. Cohen, based on the
government's description of both the quantity and quality of
discovery, is that schedule that's been laid out sufficient
from your perspective to do everything that you need to do?
MR. COHEN: Your Honor, just two points in that
regard. I think counsel for the government did not mention in
the e-mail we had sent to your Honor's law clerk that August 21
would be the deadline for production of search warrant
applications and the subpoena returns. I think she just failed
to mention it for the record. That would also be part of the
schedule.
THE COURT: Thank you.
Ms. Moe, do you agree?
MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor. I apologize.
We did include that in the e-mail to your Honor's chambers, and
that is correct.
And thank you, counsel, for clarifying that.
MR. COHEN: Two additional points, your Honor. The
trial schedule that we are agreeing to, of course subject to
of this year, and following that we would propose the following
motion schedule: that defense motions be due by Monday,
December 21 of this year; that the government's response be due
on Friday, January 22, 2021; and that replies be due on Friday,
February 5, 2021.
THE COURT: All right. Mr. Cohen, based on the
government's description of both the quantity and quality of
discovery, is that schedule that's been laid out sufficient
from your perspective to do everything that you need to do?
MR. COHEN: Your Honor, just two points in that
regard. I think counsel for the government did not mention in
the e-mail we had sent to your Honor's law clerk that August 21
would be the deadline for production of search warrant
applications and the subpoena returns. I think she just failed
to mention it for the record. That would also be part of the
schedule.
THE COURT: Thank you.
Ms. Moe, do you agree?
MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor. I apologize.
We did include that in the e-mail to your Honor's chambers, and
that is correct.
And thank you, counsel, for clarifying that.
MR. COHEN: Two additional points, your Honor. The
trial schedule that we are agreeing to, of course subject to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001020
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document