This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (possibly by Alan Dershowitz) discussing the moral conflict of a defense attorney. The author recounts a specific legal victory involving the 'Hurok bombing' where he utilized the status of an informant, Sheldon Seigel, and an unlawful wiretap to secure the release of clients he knew were guilty of killing a woman named Iris Kones. The text details the judge's anger directed at the attorney and the attorney's lingering guilt over the 'legally proper' but unjust result.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Narrator | Defense Attorney |
The author of the text (likely Alan Dershowitz based on context of Hurok bombing defense), reflecting on the guilt of...
|
| Iris Kones | Victim |
Innocent young woman killed in the Hurok bombing.
|
| Sheldon Seigel (Siegel) | Informer / Defendant |
His status as an informer and unlawful wiretap discovery led to the case dismissal. Died young after a heart transplant.
|
| Trial Judge | Judge |
Forced to release the defendants; scolded the lawyer for being responsible for injustice.
|
| Client / Co-defendants | Defendants |
Perpetrators of the bombing who admitted guilt but were set free due to legal technicalities.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court of Appeals |
Issued the ruling ordering the trial judge to set the defendants free.
|
|
| Harvard University |
Institution where Iris Kones' family is active.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Source of the document production (Footer stamp).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the judge released the defendants and delivered the admonishment.
|
"Do you know who isn’t in court today? Iris Kones."Source
"And you are responsible."Source
"I suspect there were others as well, but I can’t be absolutely sure of any but Iris Kones, because my client in that case told me, and the world, that he was guilty."Source
"His premature death didn’t make me feel any less responsible for the unjust, but legally proper, result I helped produce on his case."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,784 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document