HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021936.jpg
1.17 MB
Extraction Summary
8
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal transcript (deposition/hearing)
File Size:
1.17 MB
Summary
This is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or hearing (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT). A witness is testifying about an event around July 2010 involving a client represented by themselves and Brad Edwards. The testimony is interrupted by a phone line, leading to the identification of Ken Sweder, Alan Dershowitz, and Darrin Indyke as listeners on the call.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Witness | Witness/Attorney |
Testifying regarding representation of a woman in 2010
|
| Brad Edwards | Attorney |
Colleague of the witness, co-represented the woman mentioned
|
| Mr. Simpson | Attorney/Interrogator |
Managing the proceedings and identifying phone participants
|
| Mr. Scarola | Attorney |
Requests identification of people on the phone before muting
|
| Ken Sweder | Participant (via phone) |
Identifies himself as listening on the phone line
|
| Alan Dershowitz | Participant (via phone) |
Identified by Mr. Sweder as being on the phone line
|
| Darrin Indyke | Participant (via phone) |
Identifies himself as listening on the phone line
|
| Unnamed Woman | Client |
Represented by the witness and Brad Edwards in 2010; referred to by initials (though initials not shown on this page)
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'
|
Timeline (2 events)
July 2nd or July 3rd, 2010
Witness had personal experience/representation regarding a female client.
Unknown
Unknown
Deposition/Hearing interruption where phone participants are identified.
Deposition Room
Relationships (3)
Witness states 'my colleague, Brad Edwards'
Sweder identifies Dershowitz as being on the line
Both present on the same phone line monitoring the deposition
Key Quotes (4)
"I was representing along with my colleague, Brad Edwards"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021936.jpg
Quote #1
"MR. SWEDER: Alan Dershowitz."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021936.jpg
Quote #2
"MR. INDYKE: Darrin Indyke."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021936.jpg
Quote #3
"Before the phone is muted, could we identify who is on the phone now, please?"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021936.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,288 characters)
113
1 2nd, July 3rd, I believe it was 2010, where a woman that
2 I was representing along with my colleague, Brad
3 Edwards, I'll refer to her by initials, if that's all
4 right with you.
5 (Phone Interruption.)
6 MR. SIMPSON: On the phone, could you --
7 THE WITNESS: Can we mute them?
8 MR. SIMPSON: Would you mute it, please?
9 MR. SCAROLA: Before the phone is muted,
10 could we identify who is on the phone now,
11 please? Who is on the phone?
12 MR. SIMPSON: Yeah. Who is on the phone?
13 MR. SWEDER: Ken Sweder.
14 MR. SIMPSON: Anyone else?
15 MR. SWEDER: Alan Dershowitz.
16 MR. INDYKE: Darrin Indyke.
17 MR. SIMPSON: Anyone else? Did you get
18 those? Okay.
19 THE WITNESS: I just need to make a note
20 because I kind of got distracted there. Let's
21 see. We had -- oh, right. Okay.
22 That was the other point I wanted to make.
23 And I've only got about another minute or
24 two, but the point was, I had had personal
25 experience on about July 2nd, I believe it was,
2 I was representing along with my colleague, Brad
3 Edwards, I'll refer to her by initials, if that's all
4 right with you.
5 (Phone Interruption.)
6 MR. SIMPSON: On the phone, could you --
7 THE WITNESS: Can we mute them?
8 MR. SIMPSON: Would you mute it, please?
9 MR. SCAROLA: Before the phone is muted,
10 could we identify who is on the phone now,
11 please? Who is on the phone?
12 MR. SIMPSON: Yeah. Who is on the phone?
13 MR. SWEDER: Ken Sweder.
14 MR. SIMPSON: Anyone else?
15 MR. SWEDER: Alan Dershowitz.
16 MR. INDYKE: Darrin Indyke.
17 MR. SIMPSON: Anyone else? Did you get
18 those? Okay.
19 THE WITNESS: I just need to make a note
20 because I kind of got distracted there. Let's
21 see. We had -- oh, right. Okay.
22 That was the other point I wanted to make.
23 And I've only got about another minute or
24 two, but the point was, I had had personal
25 experience on about July 2nd, I believe it was,
ROUGH DRAFT ONLY
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021936
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document