Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Mr. Simpson

Person
Mentions
97
Relationships
13
Events
25
Documents
47
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
13 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person MR. SCAROLA
Opposing counsel
9 Strong
5
View
person Mr. Dershowitz
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Alan Dershowitz
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Cassell
Legal representative
5
1
View
person THE WITNESS
Legal representative
5
1
View
person the witness
Legal representative
5
1
View
person MR. CASSELL
Interviewer witness
5
1
View
person MR. CASSELL
Legal representative
5
1
View
person the witness
Examiner deponent
5
1
View
person the witness
Professional adversarial
5
1
View
person ALAN DERSHOWITZ
Business associate
5
1
View
person MR. SCAROLA
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Mr. Indyke
Legal representative
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Legal deposition/testimony Unknown View
N/A N/A Deposition of Cassell Unknown View
N/A N/A Marking of Cassell Exhibit 1 Deposition room View
N/A N/A Marking of Exhibit 2 Deposition room View
N/A N/A End of deposition session / Break Unknown View
N/A N/A Deposition testimony regarding legal strategy and factual basis for allegations. Unknown View
N/A N/A Deposition of Professor Cassell Deposition Room View
N/A N/A Deposition of Mr. Cassell Unknown View
N/A N/A Deposition/Hearing interruption where phone participants are identified. Deposition Room View
N/A N/A Marking of Cassell Exhibit 3 Deposition setting View
N/A N/A Marking of 'Exhibit 3' (Cassell 3) Deposition/Hearing Room View
N/A N/A Recess in deposition proceedings Deposition room (unspecifie... View
N/A N/A Deposition testimony regarding privilege and common interest agreements Unknown View
N/A N/A Legal proceeding involving testimony where Alan Dershowitz is present and accused of disrupting t... Unspecified legal venue View
N/A N/A Deposition of Paul G. Cassell by Mr. Simpson regarding previous legal filings. Unknown View
N/A N/A Legal deposition or hearing where a witness is questioned about evidence concerning Professor Der... Unknown View
N/A N/A Video Record Recess Deposition Room (Time: 4:01... View
N/A N/A Deposition/Testimony of Professor Cassell Unknown View
N/A N/A Deposition of an unnamed witness regarding an investigation. Unknown View
N/A N/A Deposition/Legal Proceeding Unknown View
N/A N/A Deposition/Hearing Testimony Unknown View
2020-05-01 N/A Deposition/Testimony Unknown View
2017-07-26 N/A Legal Deposition Unknown View
2015-10-16 N/A Deposition of Paul G. Cassell Unknown (facilitated by Esq... View
2009-01-01 N/A Deposition Testimony Unknown View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015633.jpg

This document is page 13 of a legal response in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). It contains a transcript excerpt from a deposition where Alan Dershowitz questions Ms. McCawley's standing, followed by legal commentary regarding a statement released by Ms. McCawley on behalf of David Boies concerning privileged settlement discussions. The document references depositions of Alan Dershowitz from 2015 and 2016.

Court filing (response to motion)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021955.jpg

This document is page 132 of a rough draft deposition transcript marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. It captures the end of a questioning session where Mr. Simpson asks a witness if an adverse inference can be drawn solely from being on an airplane with a 24-year-old woman, to which the witness replies 'obviously not.' The session concludes at 4:31 p.m. with the attorneys agreeing to discuss logistics for the following day off the record.

Deposition transcript (rough draft)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021954.jpg

This is page 131 of a rough draft deposition transcript from a House Oversight investigation. Attorney Mr. Simpson is questioning a witness identified as Mr. Cassell about the legality of a romantic relationship between a middle-aged man and a 24-year-old. The proceedings are interrupted by Mr. Scarola noting the time is 4:30, leading to a tense exchange between Mr. Scarola and Mr. Scott regarding whether Mr. Scott is smiling.

Legal deposition transcript (rough draft)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021953.jpg

This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition involving the House Oversight Committee. Mr. Simpson questions a witness about a woman named Tatiana, specifically regarding her age during a specific flight, confirming she was over 18. The line of questioning then pivots to the legality and social perception of Jeffrey Epstein having a relationship with a 24-year-old woman, prompting an interjection from Mr. Scarola regarding the nature of such a relationship.

Legal transcript / deposition (rough draft)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021952.jpg

This is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript (page 129) marked with a House Oversight footer. The witness is being questioned about a woman named Tatiana, specifically regarding her age during a flight in 1998. The witness asserts they understood Tatiana to be 18 or older, while the questioning attorney suggests research indicates she was 24 at the time.

Deposition transcript (rough draft)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021947.jpg

This document is page 124 of a rough draft deposition transcript from a House Oversight investigation. The witness, advised by attorney Mr. Scarola to invoke common interest privilege, refuses to answer whether their legal team communicated with Mr. Josefsburg. The testimony discusses a complaint signed by Josefsburg using the term 'academicians,' which the witness interprets as evidence against Alan Dershowitz, noting that a partner in Josefsburg's firm subsequently questioned Dershowitz about a sex abuse matter.

Deposition transcript (rough draft)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021946.jpg

This page is a transcript of a deposition (marked Rough Draft) from a House Oversight investigation. Mr. Simpson questions a witness about a civil complaint styled 'Jane Doe 102 versus Epstein,' confirming that Jane Doe 102 is Virginia Roberts. The questioning focuses on whether the witness asked Virginia Roberts' lawyer, Bob Josefsburg, if the term 'academicians' in said complaint included Alan Dershowitz. Attorney Ms. McCawley asserts privilege regarding communications between Virginia Roberts and her counsel.

Legal transcript / deposition
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021945.jpg

This document is page 122 of a rough draft transcript from a legal deposition, likely related to a House Oversight investigation. Attorney Mr. Simpson questions a witness (a former prosecutor from the Eastern District of Virginia) about the admissibility of a third party's Fifth Amendment invocation as evidence in criminal versus civil cases. Mr. Scarola is also present as counsel. The witness discusses their experience with approximately 20 trials involving drug dealers and gun runners but cannot recall specific instances of using the Fifth Amendment in the manner described.

Legal transcript / deposition (rough draft)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021940.jpg

This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or hearing involving the House Oversight Committee. A witness is being questioned by Mr. Simpson regarding Jeffrey Epstein's use of the Fifth Amendment. The witness testifies that Epstein selectively invoked the Fifth Amendment to protect people 'higher up in the echelon' (specifically citing Professor Dershowitz), while willing to identify 'household people' (citing Alessi) in civil case interrogatories.

Legal transcript / deposition
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021936.jpg

This is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or hearing (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT). A witness is testifying about an event around July 2010 involving a client represented by themselves and Brad Edwards. The testimony is interrupted by a phone line, leading to the identification of Ken Sweder, Alan Dershowitz, and Darrin Indyke as listeners on the call.

Legal transcript (deposition/hearing)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021934.jpg

This document is page 111 of a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from a House Oversight investigation. The witness testifies about unsuccessful attempts to depose an individual (implied to be Alan Dershowitz) in 2009, 2011, and 2013. The witness characterizes Dershowitz and 'Epstein's organization' as having a pattern of evading information requests and using stall tactics, specifically citing an incident involving the Palm Beach Police Department.

Deposition transcript (rough draft)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021931.jpg

This is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021931). Mr. Simpson questions a witness about the seriousness of accusing an adult of sex with a minor and the harm caused by false allegations to victims' rights. The questioning specifically focuses on the witness's previous statements and inferences regarding allegations that Professor Dershowitz engaged in misconduct.

Deposition transcript / legal proceeding
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021930.jpg

This is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from the House Oversight Committee's investigation given the Bates stamp. An emotional witness (likely a victim) defends 'multiple girls' against attacks from the questioning attorney's side and requests a break. During the recess (4:01-4:04 p.m.), Mr. and Mrs. Dershowitz leave the room. Attorney Mr. Simpson then attempts to question Mr. Cassell, but is interrupted by Ms. McCawley noting the witness had stepped out for water.

Deposition transcript (rough draft)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021929.jpg

This is a page from a rough draft of a deposition transcript (page 106) stamped by the House Oversight Committee. The exchange is between Mr. Simpson (questioner) and Mr. Cassell (witness). Tensions rise as Cassell defends a lengthy answer, stating he was not filibustering but addressing a matter critical to 'Miss Roberts' involving 'sexual abuse.' Simpson apologizes for attempting humor, acknowledging the intensity of the situation, and compares Cassell's conduct to that of Professor Dershowitz.

Legal deposition transcript (rough draft)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021928.jpg

This is page 105 of a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from a House Oversight investigation. The testimony discusses the potential influence of a person 'fifth in line to the British Throne' over law enforcement in England and the US. The witness confirms relying on information regarding allegations about Virginia Roberts and a 'sex trafficking organization.' The page concludes with attorneys Scarola and Simpson making a comparative remark about Mr. Dershowitz's tendency to give long answers.

Deposition transcript (rough draft)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021918.jpg

A page from a rough draft deposition transcript involving Mr. Simpson, Mr. Scarola, and a witness. The discussion centers on the introduction of a one-page document (partially typed with handwriting) into evidence, which is subsequently marked for identification as 'Cassell Exhibit 3'. The witness mentions a timeline involving 'December 30th'.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021917.jpg

A page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or hearing involving the House Oversight Committee. Mr. Simpson questions the witness, Mr. Cassell, about a document Cassell prepared to summarize his knowledge. They agree to mark this document as 'Exhibit 3' (Cassell 3), with Cassell clarifying that the document contains pre- and post-December 30th sections.

Legal transcript / deposition
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021916.jpg

This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition involving Professor Cassell. The witness testifies that Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards contacted a woman in Australia via telephone, who identified Alan Dershowitz as having information regarding Jeffrey Epstein and the sexual abuse of underage girls. During the questioning by Mr. Simpson, Mr. Scarola interrupts to assert that Professor Cassell is entitled to refresh his recollection before moving to a new subject.

Legal transcript (deposition/testimony - rough draft)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021910.jpg

This page describes a deposition where the witness discusses the credibility of attorney David Boies. The witness draws a parallel between Boies' high-profile work representing Al Gore in the 'Bush v. Gore' Supreme Court case and his decision to represent Virginia Roberts. The witness implies that Boies' involvement gave weight or significance to Roberts' case.

Legal deposition transcript (rough draft)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021909.jpg

This document is page 86 of a legal deposition transcript (rough draft). The witness testifies that flight logs demonstrate a close association and travel history between Alan Dershowitz and Jeffrey Epstein. The witness then mentions becoming aware on December 30th that attorney David Boies had agreed to represent Virginia Roberts. At this point, attorney Mr. Simpson interrupts the testimony to raise an objection regarding a potential waiver of attorney-client privilege.

Legal transcript / deposition (rough draft)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021906.jpg

This document is page 83 of a rough draft deposition transcript. A witness testifies that pilot Dave Rogers produced flight logs during sex abuse litigation against Epstein. The witness notes that when these logs were compared to logs provided by Mr. Dershowitz to the Palm Beach Police Department, inconsistencies were found, arousing suspicion. The testimony is briefly interrupted by Mr. Scott, who reports receiving a call from Epstein's lawyer, Darrin Indyke, regarding technical phone issues.

Deposition transcript (rough draft)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021894.jpg

This page is a rough draft transcript from the deposition of Professor Cassell. Attorney Mr. Scarola places an objection on the record regarding Alan Dershowitz's behavior, specifically accusing him of distracting the room by jumping up and excitedly whispering in Mr. Simpson's ear during testimony. Mr. Simpson disagrees with the characterization but agrees to pass notes moving forward.

Legal deposition transcript (rough draft)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021893.jpg

This document is a page from a rough draft legal transcript (page 70) marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. It records a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Scarola and Mr. Simpson regarding the conduct of Alan Dershowitz. Scarola complains that Dershowitz has been repeatedly 'jumping up' during testimony over the last two days, while Simpson attempts to downplay the disruptions, stating he only saw Dershowitz approach him once.

Legal transcript (deposition or hearing)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021892.jpg

This document is a page from a rough draft of a legal transcript (Bates stamped House Oversight) where a witness discusses Jeffrey Epstein taking the Fifth Amendment to avoid self-incrimination, specifically regarding his connection to Alan Dershowitz. The testimony is interrupted by a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Scarola and Ms. McCawley regarding the disruptive behavior of McCawley's client, who was allegedly jumping up and down and using profanity in the room.

Legal transcript (deposition/testimony - rough draft)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021890.jpg

This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition. A witness testifies about reviewing flight records that placed Mr. Dershowitz on a plane with a woman named Tatiana (or noted as 'one female'), expressing suspicion that this was related to sexual purposes or sex trafficking involving Mr. Epstein. The witness also references Virginia Roberts as a known victim, while attorney Ms. McCawley advises the witness on the scope of their testimony regarding affidavits.

Legal transcript / deposition (rough draft)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
15
As Recipient
3
Total
18

Questioning regarding Tatiana and Epstein

From: Mr. Simpson
To: witness

Dialogue regarding the age of Tatiana during a flight and the legality of age-gap relationships involving Epstein.

Deposition/hearing
N/A
Communication Source

N/A

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: Mr. Simpson

Excited whispering during testimony

Whispering/in-person communication
N/A
Communication Source

N/A

From: Mr. Simpson
To: Unnamed Co-counsel

Agreement to pass notes instead of whispering to avoid distraction

Note passing
N/A
Communication Source

Timing of written agreement execution

From: Mr. Simpson
To: THE WITNESS

Questioning regarding whether a written agreement was executed before or after December 30th, 2014.

Deposition testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: Mr. Simpson
To: PAUL G. CASSELL

Initial questioning establishing the witness's background as a former US District Judge.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Objection check

From: Mr. Simpson
To: Mr. Indyke

Checking if there was an objection on the phone.

Verbal
N/A
Communication Source

Allegations against Professor Dershowitz

From: Mr. Simpson
To: THE WITNESS (Deponent)

Questioning regarding whether the witness was told about abuse committed by Dershowitz.

Depostion questioning
N/A
Communication Source

Legal Pleading and Allegations against Dershowitz

From: Mr. Simpson
To: THE WITNESS (Deponent)

Questioning regarding the basis for including 'other minors' in a motion to join and allegations against Alan Dershowitz.

Deposition
N/A
Communication Source

Marking a prepared summary as an exhibit

From: Mr. Simpson
To: MR. CASSELL

Discussion regarding a document prepared by Cassell to summarize his knowledge, to be marked as Exhibit 3.

Legal proceeding
N/A
Communication Source

Questioning regarding relationships

From: Mr. Simpson
To: MR. CASSELL

Discussion about the legality of a romantic relationship with a 24-year-old and procedural arguments between lawyers.

Deposition/legal proceeding
N/A
Communication Source

Questioning regarding willingness to answer

From: Mr. Simpson
To: Professor Cassell

Simpson asks if the witness will refuse to answer; Scarola instructs witness not to answer based on privilege; Witness confirms he will follow instructions.

Deposition/testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Questioning regarding Josefsburg and Dershowitz

From: Mr. Simpson
To: witness

Questioning whether the witness asked Josefsburg if 'academicians' included Alan Dershowitz.

Testimony/deposition
N/A
Communication Source

Questioning regarding memory of events

From: MR. CASSELL
To: Mr. Simpson

Mr. Cassell defends his detailed answer against a perceived accusation of filibustering, stressing the importance of the subject to Miss Roberts. Mr. Simpson apologizes for a joke.

Deposition testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Scope of Investigation / Videotaping Protocol

From: Mr. Simpson
To: the witness

Discussion regarding where the witness should look during videotaping, followed by a question regarding the necessity of investigation for serious allegations of misconduct.

Deposition testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Courtroom Conduct

From: MR. SCAROLA
To: Mr. Simpson

Discussion regarding Alan Dershowitz interrupting proceedings by standing up.

Verbal argument
N/A
Communication Source

Evidence and Recollection

From: Mr. Simpson
To: the witness

Questioning regarding evidence relied upon and the process of recalling information.

Deposition/hearing
N/A
Communication Source

Knowledge of abuse allegations

From: Mr. Simpson
To: THE WITNESS (Deponent)

Questioning whether the witness knew of anyone claiming Professor Dershowitz abused other minors as of Dec 30, 2014.

Legal questioning context
2014-12-30
Communication Source

Witnesses to abuse allegations

From: Mr. Simpson
To: THE WITNESS (Deponent)

Question regarding knowledge of witnesses who could testify that Alan Dershowitz abused a minor.

Legal questioning
2014-12-30
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search