DOJ-OGR-00015001.jpg
524 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
524 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, specifically the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio, filed on January 15, 2025. The questioning centers on a study about "predatory alienation," a term the questioner asserts was created by an advocacy group. Rocchio clarifies that the study is qualitative rather than subjective, while the questioner probes its methodology and origins.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rocchio | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the person being cross-examined ("Rocchio - Cross") and provides the answers ("A.") in the...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
| advocacy group | advocacy group |
Mentioned multiple times as the creator of the term "predatory alienation" which is the subject of the study being di...
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
Relationships (1)
The document is a transcript of a formal cross-examination, where an attorney (Questioner) is questioning a witness (Rocchio) in a legal setting.
Key Quotes (3)
"-- it says that this study is this phenomenological study, it's data collected as part of a statewide initiative to understand predatory alienation -- a new term created by an advocacy group."Source
— Questioner
(The questioner is quoting from a document to establish the context and origin of the study being discussed.)
DOJ-OGR-00015001.jpg
Quote #1
"I wouldn't call it a subjective study. I'd call it a qualitative study. But it's investigating the phenomenon of predatory alienation, which it looks like was a term created by an advocacy group."Source
— Rocchio
(The witness (Rocchio) is correcting the questioner's characterization of the study as "subjective" and clarifying it as "qualitative".)
DOJ-OGR-00015001.jpg
Quote #2
"All experts identified as cisgender females between early 20s and"Source
— Questioner
(The questioner is quoting from another part of the document under discussion, likely related to the study's participants or methodology.)
DOJ-OGR-00015001.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,290 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 125 of 158 125
LBAGmax4
Rocchio - Cross
LBAGmax4
Rocchio - Cross
1 Q. And that is explaining the experience from the point of
2 view of the subject; right?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. And then they talk about why they're doing this study and
5 it's to collect data to define a new term created by an
6 advocacy group.
7 Do you see that?
8 A. I'm sorry, could you repeat the question.
9 Q. Under method --
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. -- it says that this study is this phenomenological study,
12 it's data collected as part of a statewide initiative to
13 understand predatory alienation -- a new term created by an
14 advocacy group.
15 Do you see that?
16 A. Yes.
17 Q. So that's what's being undertaken here, is this subjective
18 study to determine this term created by an advocacy group in
19 this study; right?
20 A. I wouldn't call it a subjective study. I'd call it a
21 qualitative study. But it's investigating the phenomenon of
22 predatory alienation, which it looks like was a term created by
23 an advocacy group.
24 Q. If you go down to the second part here, it says, "All
25 experts identified as cisgender females between early 20s and
2 view of the subject; right?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. And then they talk about why they're doing this study and
5 it's to collect data to define a new term created by an
6 advocacy group.
7 Do you see that?
8 A. I'm sorry, could you repeat the question.
9 Q. Under method --
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. -- it says that this study is this phenomenological study,
12 it's data collected as part of a statewide initiative to
13 understand predatory alienation -- a new term created by an
14 advocacy group.
15 Do you see that?
16 A. Yes.
17 Q. So that's what's being undertaken here, is this subjective
18 study to determine this term created by an advocacy group in
19 this study; right?
20 A. I wouldn't call it a subjective study. I'd call it a
21 qualitative study. But it's investigating the phenomenon of
22 predatory alienation, which it looks like was a term created by
23 an advocacy group.
24 Q. If you go down to the second part here, it says, "All
25 experts identified as cisgender females between early 20s and
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00015001
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document