EFTA00024708.pdf

176 KB

Extraction Summary

10
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order / email chain
File Size: 176 KB
Summary

This document contains a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Maxwell, dated May 14, 2021, and an associated email chain circulating the order. The order denies Maxwell's request to alter detention protocols regarding flashlight checks every 15 minutes, ruling that the checks are necessary for safety in a high-profile case and do not violate her rights. The email chain shows the order being forwarded by a Staff Attorney at MDC Brooklyn.

People (10)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the court order regarding detention conditions and flashlight checks.
Alison J. Nathan U.S. District Judge
Signed the order denying Maxwell's request regarding flashlight checks.
David Boies, II Attorney
Recipient of electronic notice.
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Attorney
Recipient of electronic notice.
Laura A. Menninger Attorney
Recipient of electronic notice.
Bobbi C Sternheim Attorney
Recipient of electronic notice.
Christian R. Everdell Attorney
Recipient of electronic notice.
Mark Stewart Cohen Attorney
Recipient of electronic notice.
Sigrid S. McCawley Attorney
Recipient of electronic notice.
[Redacted] Staff Attorney
MDC Brooklyn employee forwarding the order.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Court issuing the order.
MDC Brooklyn
Metropolitan Detention Center where Maxwell is housed.
Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Agency responsible for detention protocols.
USANYS
U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (appearing in email headers).

Timeline (1 events)

2021-05-14
Judge Alison J. Nathan issues Order (Doc 282) denying Ghislaine Maxwell's request to modify flashlight check procedures.
U.S. District Court, SDNY
Judge Alison J. Nathan Ghislaine Maxwell

Locations (2)

Location Context
Detention facility.
Jurisdiction.

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant / Judge Alison J. Nathan
Case Name: USA v. Maxwell; Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan

Key Quotes (4)

"guards are shining a flashlight in Maxwell's eyes every 15 minutes at night."
Source
EFTA00024708.pdf
Quote #1
"BOP's flashlight checks of Maxwell are relatively more frequent than those of other inmates, including that Maxwell is housed alone, the nature of the charges, and the potential stress for inmates that can arise in high-profile cases."
Source
EFTA00024708.pdf
Quote #2
"that request is denied as factually unsubstantiated and legally unsupported."
Source
EFTA00024708.pdf
Quote #3
"flashlights are pointed at the ceiling of the cell to confirm that the inmate is present, breathing, and not in distress."
Source
EFTA00024708.pdf
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (5,294 characters)

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Order
Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 12:16:57 +0000
Thank you, Have a good weekend!
[REDACTED]
Staff Attorney
MDC Brooklyn
-------- Original message --------
From: "[REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>
Date: 5/14/21 5:18 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: FW: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Order
>>> "[REDACTED] (USANYS)" 05/14/2021 17:18 >>>
[REDACTED]
Please see the attached Order from Judge Nathan.
Thank you,
[REDACTED]
From: NYSD_ECF_Pool@nysd.uscourts.gov
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 4:57 PM
To: CourtMail@nysd.uscourts.gov
Subject: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Order
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** There is no charge for viewing opinions.
U.S. District Court
Southern District of New York
Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered on 5/14/2021 at 4:57 PM EDT and filed on 5/14/2021
EFTA00024708
Case Name: USA v. Maxwell
Case Number: 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Filer:
Document Number: 282
Docket Text:
ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On April 29, 2021, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell wrote to the Court requesting that the Court address her sleeping conditions, with particular emphasis on counsel's representation, unsupported by affidavit or other factual showing, that guards are shining a flashlight in Maxwell's eyes every 15 minutes at night. Dkt. No. 256. Defense counsel claims that the flashlight surveillance in Maxwell's eyes is disrupting her sleep, which in turn is impacting her ability to prepare for and withstand trial. The Court sought more information by ordering the Government to confer with legal counsel for the Bureau of Prisons and to respond to certain questions. Dkt. No. 257. In response, the Government states that MDC staff conduct flashlight checks of all inmates as a matter of course. Dkt. No. 270. As reported by the Government, inmates housed with cell mates in the Special Housing Unit are checked with flashlights every 30 minutes. Inmates housed with others in the general population are checked multiple times per night at regular intervals. The Government further reports that to conduct the checks, flashlights are pointed at the ceiling of the cell to confirm that the inmate is present, breathing, and not in distress. As the Government explains, there are a number of neutral reasons why BOP's flashlight checks of Maxwell are relatively more frequent than those of other inmates, including that Maxwell is housed alone, the nature of the charges, and the potential stress for inmates that can arise in high-profile cases. The MDC has determined that these factors necessitate more frequent safety and security checks. The Government also indicates that the prohibition on eye masks is a generally applicable policy, but that Maxwell, like other inmates, may use other noncontraband items to cover her eyes. To the extent that Maxwell's April 29, 2021 letter asks the Court to override BOP's determination as to the frequency of appropriate safety and security check procedures, that request is denied as factually unsubstantiated and legally unsupported. Certainly nothing in the record plausibly establishes that current protocols interfere with Maxwell's ability to prepare for her trial and communicate with her lawyers. Defense counsel's May 7, 2021 letter, Dkt. No. 272, describes generalized grievances but makes no additional specific and supported application for relief. Nevertheless, the Court urges the MDC to consider whether sleep disruption for pretrial detainees can be reduced. The Court also admonishes the MDC and the Government to continue to ensure that Maxwell is subjected to only those security protocols that BOP determines are necessary for her safety and security, based upon neutral and applicable factors, and consistent with the treatment of similarly situated pre-trial detainees. The Government shall provide a copy of this Order to the Warden and General Counsel for the MDC. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 5/14/2021) (lnl)
1:20-cr-00330-AJN-1 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
David Boies, II [REDACTED]
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca [REDACTED]
Laura A. Menninger [REDACTED]
Bobbi C Sternheim [REDACTED]
Christian R. Everdell [REDACTED]
EFTA00024709
Mark Stewart Cohen [REDACTED]
Sigrid S. McCawley [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] CaseView.ECF@usdoj.gov, USANYS.ECF@USDOJ.GOV
[REDACTED] CaseView.ECF@usdoj.gov, USANYS.ECF@USDOJ.GOV
[REDACTED] CaseView.ECF@usdoj.gov, USANYS.ECF@USDOJ.GOV
[REDACTED] CaseView.ECF@usdoj.gov, USANYS.ECF@USDOJ.GOV
[REDACTED] caseview.ecf@usdoj.gov, usanys.ecf@usdoj.gov
1:20-cr-00330-AJN-1 Notice has been delivered by other means to:
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document description:Main Document
Original filename:n/a
Electronic document Stamp:
[STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1008691343 [Date=5/14/2021] [FileNumber=25895804-0] [63ff0bfb01f10bffc3d0e8d2bdeb02f59ed4d2bf8b47cd533ab0bf35151331f4a2bc39021735fdaccd93fb8393b4940bd5771a6fac04662d94433fb4c5e38233]]
EFTA00024710

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document