Sigrid S. McCawley
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Teresa Helm
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
anonymous victim
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Victim/Author
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Opposing counsel implied |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Author (Victim)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
District of Columbia Bar
|
Professional membership |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe No. 3
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
boies
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia L. Giuffre
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Captivity | The author describes being held captive by 'Wexner's thugs via Ghislaine and Jeffrey,' which resu... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A court hearing is mentioned where Virginia Giuffre was expected to be present to give a statement. | courtroom | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell, for which Annie Farmer's victim impact statement is provided. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Reporting to law enforcement | The author, Sigrid S. McCawley, went to the FBI, an event which she states led to her life no lon... | N/A | View |
| 2025-08-05 | Filing | Filing of Document 72 in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-27 | Court filing | A letter from Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan was electronically filed with the court. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court Record | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 674 | Court Docket 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 674 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court Record | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Legal filing | Document 672 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Letter submitted regarding Victim Impact Statement | New York, NY | View |
| 2022-06-01 | N/A | Sentencing submission for Ghislaine Maxwell | New York (implied by Case 1... | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Document filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court Record | View |
| 2021-04-02 | N/A | Order granting Pro Hac Vice for Sigrid S. McCawley | Court | View |
| 2021-04-02 | N/A | Order granting Motion for Sigrid S. McCawley to Appear Pro Hac Vice | SDNY | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Filing of a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice in the case of United States of America v. Ghislain... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Filing of a Declaration of Sigrid S. McCawley in Support of Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court filing | Motion filed for Sigrid S. McCawley to Appear Pro Hac Vice, with a $200.00 filing fee paid. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court filing | Notice of Appearance filed for Sigrid S. McCawley on behalf of victims. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court filing | A letter was filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, objecting to her... | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by Sigrid S. McCawley. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court filing | Notice regarding Pro Hac Vice Motion for Sigrid S. McCawley was reviewed and found to have no def... | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Appearance of attorneys David Boies and Sigrid S. McCawley representing victims. | Court Docket | View |
| 2021-03-24 | N/A | Issuance of Certificate of Good Standing. | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2021-03-04 | Court filing | This declaration (Document 142) was filed in Case 1:9-cv-00383-AJN. | N/A | View |
059.pdf
This document is a joint status report filed on August 14, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The attorneys for both parties inform Judge Debra Freeman that the plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program and is awaiting a determination. Consequently, both parties request a 45-day extension to the current stay of discovery to preserve resources while the compensation claim is processed.
044.pdf
This document is a legal filing from May 2020 in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a letter from the Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Estate Executors are obstructing discovery by limiting it to a narrow time window in 2002 and refusing to answer questions fully. The attached Exhibit A contains the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, in which they identify specific staff members (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and Lesley Groff) who worked at Epstein's New York home during late 2002, list various email accounts and phone numbers associated with Epstein, and identify Shoppers Travel, Inc. as his travel agency. No specific flight logs or aircraft manifests are included in the document.
042.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated May 11, 2020, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley (representing Plaintiff Teresa Helm) to Judge Debra Freeman. The letter requests a court conference to address the Defendants' (Indyke and Kahn, executors of the Epstein estate) alleged failure to participate in discovery, specifically their refusal to produce documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking conspiracy and to answer interrogatories regarding email accounts used by Epstein. McCawley argues that the Defendants are engaging in obstructionist delay tactics.
037.pdf
This document is a letter from Sigrid S. McCawley, representing Plaintiff Teresa Helm, to Judge Debra Freeman, requesting a pre-motion conference to compel Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Epstein's lawyer and accountant) to produce discovery documents and respond to interrogatories. The letter details Defendants' failure to comply with discovery obligations, including not producing any documents and improperly limiting the relevant time period for discovery, despite allegations that Jeffrey Epstein operated a decades-long sex-trafficking scheme and sexually assaulted the Plaintiff in 2002.
030.pdf
This document is a letter dated March 20, 2020, from attorney Joshua I. Schiller of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Paul G. Gardephe. It requests oral argument regarding the Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint in the case of Helm v. Indyke et al. The letter argues that the Plaintiff's claims are timely under New York law and doctrines of equitable estoppel/tolling, contrary to the Defendants' assertions.
028.pdf
This document is an Affidavit of Service filed on March 20, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. John Murphy of Troutman Sanders LLP attests that he served the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and supporting memorandum to attorneys David Boies II, Sigrid S. McCawley, and Joshua Schiller of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP on February 24, 2020.
015.pdf
This document is a Discovery Plan and Proposed Scheduling Order filed on February 6, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff outlines broad discovery requests, including Epstein's flight logs, helicopter logs, financial records, Amazon order history, and communications with government officials and co-conspirators. The Co-Executors attempt to limit the scope of discovery strictly to the alleged abuse of the plaintiff and her damages, and the document outlines conflicting proposed deadlines for the discovery process.
013.pdf
Legal correspondence from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Gardephe regarding the case Helm v. Indyke et al. The letter argues against the Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss, asserting that Plaintiff Teresa Helm's claims are timely under NY CPLR § 215(8)(a) due to the recent termination of Epstein's criminal case (August 2019) and the doctrine of equitable estoppel based on Epstein's intimidation and manipulation tactics. The letter also argues that challenges to punitive damages are premature at this stage of litigation.
008.pdf
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated November 25, 2019. It grants the motion for attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to appear Pro Hac Vice as counsel for plaintiff Teresa Helm in her case against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The order is signed by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman.
029.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation and Order filed in April 2020 in the Southern District of New York, staying the lawsuit brought by Maria Farmer against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The stay was agreed upon to allow Farmer to participate in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, a non-adversarial alternative for resolving sexual abuse claims. The order was signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald.
028.pdf
A legal stipulation filed on April 9, 2020, in the Southern District of New York, wherein Plaintiff Maria Farmer and the Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) agreed to stay the lawsuit. The stay was requested to allow Farmer to participate in the 'Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program,' a non-adversarial alternative for resolving sexual abuse claims against the estate.
014.pdf
This document is a legal letter from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP on behalf of Plaintiff Maria Farmer in the case 'Farmer v. Indyke et al.' It argues against the Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss, asserting that Farmer's claims are timely under NY CPLR § 215(8)(a) because they were filed within one year of the termination of the criminal action against Jeffrey Epstein (Aug 29, 2019). The letter also argues that equitable estoppel applies due to threats made against Farmer, including a specific death threat involving the West Side Highway.
010.pdf
This document is a letter from Maria Farmer's legal counsel to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald opposing Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene in the case *Farmer v. Indyke et al.*. Dershowitz sought to intervene to strike Paragraph 39 of Farmer's complaint, which alleges that Farmer, while working at Epstein's NY mansion, saw Dershowitz go upstairs while young girls were present. The letter argues that Dershowitz has no right to intervene, that the allegations are relevant to the sex-trafficking conspiracy and Farmer's silence, and that the motion to strike is meritless.
007.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated November 25, 2019, in the case of Maria Farmer v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein). The order grants attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP admission to practice Pro Hac Vice to represent the plaintiff, Maria Farmer.
006.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on November 21, 2019, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP requests permission to represent the plaintiff, Maria Farmer, in her case against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.
001-05.pdf
This document outlines Ghislaine Maxwell's formal objections and responses to Virginia Giuffre's second request for production of documents in the 2015 civil case. Maxwell's counsel objects to numerous requests on grounds of privilege, relevance, and burden, specifically refusing to produce financial documents (tax returns, bank statements, asset lists) pending a motion for a protective order. The document also addresses requests for Joint Defense Agreements with Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz, communications regarding sexual abuse allegations, and funding sources for the TerraMar Project, including any from the Clinton Foundation.
001-01.pdf
Legal declaration by attorney Bradley J. Edwards filed on June 13, 2016, in support of a motion to quash a subpoena from Ghislaine Maxwell. Edwards details his representation of Virginia Giuffre and the undue burden of reviewing over 200,000 emails for communications with journalists. He explicitly states that Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein share a joint defense agreement and mentions Giuffre's association with the organization 'Victims Refuse Silence, Inc.'
071.pdf
This document is a joint status report filed on August 14, 2020, by attorneys for both the Plaintiff (Jane Doe 1000) and the Defendants (Executors of the Epstein Estate). They requested a 45-day extension to the stay of discovery because the Plaintiff had submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and was awaiting a determination. The document includes a handwritten order by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman dated September 11, 2020, granting the requested extension.
069.pdf
A joint status report filed on August 14, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The attorneys for both parties inform Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program and request a 45-day extension to the stay of discovery to allow time for an eligibility determination.
053.pdf
This document is a legal filing in the civil case Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke & Kahn. It includes a letter from Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Epstein Estate executors are improperly limiting discovery to a 4-year period and refusing to produce documents regarding Epstein's broader sex-trafficking conspiracy. Attached as Exhibit A are the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, which list specific employees (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and pilots like Larry Visoski), email accounts used by Epstein (specifically noting 'jeevacation@gmail.com' and 'jeeproject@yahoo.com'), and numerous phone numbers associated with his properties in New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands.
051.pdf
This document is a legal letter filed on May 11, 2020, by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley on behalf of Plaintiff Jane Doe 1000 in her case against Epstein estate executors Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. The letter requests a court conference to address the Defendants' alleged failure to participate in discovery, specifically noting their refusal to produce documents regarding Epstein's broader sex-trafficking conspiracy and failure to answer interrogatories regarding Epstein's email accounts. The Plaintiff argues that the Defendants are engaging in intentional delay tactics.
046.pdf
This document is a legal filing from Plaintiff Jane Doe 1000's counsel requesting a pre-motion conference to compel Defendants (Epstein's executors Indyke and Kahn) to produce discovery documents and answer interrogatories. The filing includes exhibits of the discovery requests, which seek detailed information on Epstein's flight logs, financial transactions, communications with high-profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz), and the structure of his alleged sex-trafficking operation. The Defendants have objected to almost all requests, claiming they are overbroad or that they lack knowledge because Epstein is deceased, prompting the Plaintiff to seek court intervention. Note: While flight logs are requested, no actual flight data is contained in this document.
026.pdf
This document is a Discovery Plan and Proposed Scheduling Order filed on February 6, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The Plaintiff requests broad discovery including flight logs, financial records, Amazon history, and communications with government officials and co-conspirators, while the Co-Executors attempt to limit the scope strictly to the Plaintiff's alleged abuse. The document outlines proposed deadlines for document requests, HIPAA releases, and expert discovery, noting significant disagreements between the parties on the timing of these phases.
025.pdf
A legal letter from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Lorna G. Schofield arguing against the Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke et al. The letter argues that the Plaintiff's claims are timely under New York Law (CPLR § 215(8)(a) and § 213-c) and the doctrine of equitable estoppel due to Epstein's intimidation tactics. It also asserts that punitive damages should be addressed after discovery.
010.pdf
This document is a legal filing dated November 21, 2019, containing a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice for attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to represent Plaintiff Jane Doe 1000 in the case against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The document includes McCawley's declaration of good standing, a supporting Certificate of Good Standing from the Supreme Court of Florida, and a proposed order for the judge to sign granting the admission. The defendants listed are Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of Epstein's estate.
No Subject
Fax contact information for Sigrid S. McCawley.
No Subject
Email contact information for Sigrid S. McCawley.
No Subject
Phone contact information for Sigrid S. McCawley.
No Subject
Fax contact information for Sigrid S. McCawley.
No Subject
Email contact information for Sigrid S. McCawley.
No Subject
Phone contact information for Sigrid S. McCawley.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Attorney Sigrid S. McCawley writes to Judge Nathan to seek clarification that she will be permitted to read a statement on behalf of her client, Virginia Giuffre, who cannot attend a hearing due to a medical issue.
Virginia Giuffre's attendance at sentencing
Counsel informs court that Ms. Giuffre cannot attend physically due to a medical issue and requests permission to read her statement. Judge grants permission.
Clarification of Order regarding Virginia Giuffre
Requesting permission to read Giuffre's statement due to her medical inability to attend.
Virginia Giuffre Statement Reading
Request to read Virginia Giuffre's statement at sentencing due to her medical inability to attend physically.
The impact of Ghislaine Maxwell on the author's life for ...
Sigrid S. McCawley writes to describe the profound and lasting trauma inflicted upon her by Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and Wexner. She details threats to her life, the trauma of captivity, and her ongoing fear, urging the recipient to recognize Ghislaine as a 'very dangerous and devious individual' when determining her sentence.
Unknown (Redacted)
Closing of a formal letter or filing.
Unknown (Redacted)
The content is fully redacted.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from Virginia Giuffre's counsel submitting Giuffre's victim impact statement for Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing. The letter requests that the statement be read into the record because Giuffre is unable to attend in person due to a medical issue.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Legal counsel submitting a victim impact statement on behalf of Teresa Helm for Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing pursuant to the Crimes Victims’ Rights Act.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for permission for victim Teresa Helm to make an oral statement at Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing.
Reply in Support of Objections to Rule 17 Subpoena Document
Filed on docket 04/23/2021.
MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
Attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP filed a motion to be admitted to practice 'pro hac vice' in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The purpose is to appear as counsel for the law firm and the victims it represents in the case.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from BSF, representing victims, to the court regarding a previous filing. It states that BSF conferred with the Defendant's counsel and agreed to redact a narrow piece of information, but will remove the redactions if ordered by the court.
Request for continued incarceration of Ghislaine Maxwell
Argument that Maxwell should remain incarcerated until trial to prevent her from escaping justice or abusing children again.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter submitting a statement from Annie Farmer in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. The statement argues Maxwell is a psychopath and a flight risk who will not see justice if released.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter submitting a statement from Annie Farmer in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. The statement argues Maxwell is a psychopath and a flight risk who will not see justice if released.
Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke & Richard D. Kahn, 19-104...
Reply in support of letter motion for a conference to address Defendants' failure to participate in discovery.
Jane Doe 1000 v. Darren K. Indyke & Richard D. Kahn, 19- ...
Reply in support of letter motion for a conference to address Defendants' failure to participate in discovery.
Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke & Richard D. Kahn, 19-104...
Pre-motion conference request regarding Defendants' failure to produce discovery documents and respond to interrogatories.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity