EFTA00030549.pdf

36.3 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email thread
File Size: 36.3 KB
Summary

This document is an email thread from October 2020 between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and a contractor. An Assistant United States Attorney requests a report summarizing search terms used in the 'Epstein search warrant database' to analyze which terms are generating the highest volume of documents for a responsiveness review. The follow-up email acknowledges that an STR (Suspicious Transaction Report or Search Term Report) had already been sent.

People (3)

Name Role Context
[Redacted] Sender (Top Email)
USANYS employee acknowledging receipt of an STR report.
[Redacted] Assistant United States Attorney
Sender of the original email requesting search term reports. Works for Southern District of New York.
[Redacted] Contractor
Recipient of emails, tasked with running search terms in the Epstein database.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
USANYS
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York
Southern District of New York
Jurisdiction handling the case

Timeline (1 events)

2020-10-20
Deadline requested for search term report due to 'tight turnaround for finalizing our review'.
New York, NY
USANYS Staff

Locations (1)

Location Context
Office address of the Assistant United States Attorney

Relationships (1)

Assistant United States Attorney Professional/Supervisory Contractor
Attorney requesting reports from Contractor regarding database search terms.

Key Quotes (3)

"Are you able to send us a report tomorrow summarizing the search terms you ran for the responsiveness review in the Epstein search warrant database?"
Source
EFTA00030549.pdf
Quote #1
"We want to see which terms are pulling in the highest volume of documents."
Source
EFTA00030549.pdf
Quote #2
"we’re on a tight turnaround for finalizing our review."
Source
EFTA00030549.pdf
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,121 characters)

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
To: "[Redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor]" <[Redacted]>
Cc: "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted] (USANYS)"
<[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant returns
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 00:49:35 +0000
[Redacted] — so sorry, I didn't realize you’d already sent an STR report. Thanks!
From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 8:46 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Epstein search warrant returns
Hi [Redacted],
Hope you’re doing well. Are you able to send us a report tomorrow summarizing the search terms you ran for the responsiveness review in the Epstein search warrant database? We want to see which terms are pulling in the highest volume of documents.
If at all possible, we’d really appreciate this tomorrow morning, as we’re on a tight turnaround for finalizing our review.
Thanks so much—
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, NY 10007
[Redacted]
EFTA00030549

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document