DOJ-OGR-00018779.jpg
458 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
458 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning references Carolyn's prior deposition testimony, where she affirmed her trust in her attorneys regarding a complaint she filed. The transcript concludes with Carolyn confirming that the complaint she filed in federal court was not against a Ms. Maxwell.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness |
The person being cross-examined in court.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
The attorney conducting the cross-examination and addressing the court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, addressed as 'your Honor'.
|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Mentioned as the person who was not the subject of a complaint filed by the witness, Carolyn.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness Carolyn by Mr. Pagliuca regarding a prior deposition and a complaint she filed.
court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the venue where a complaint was filed by the witness.
|
Relationships (2)
Carolyn states, "I trust my attorneys. That's why they're my attorneys," indicating a client-attorney relationship based on trust.
The document establishes that Carolyn filed a complaint in federal court that was not against Ms. Maxwell, indicating they were involved in separate legal matters.
Key Quotes (2)
"No, I trust my attorneys. That's why they're my attorneys."Source
— Carolyn
(In response to a question from her deposition about whether she noticed anything missing from a complaint she read.)
DOJ-OGR-00018779.jpg
Quote #1
"That question was objected to, your Honor, so I'm not going to read it."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Explaining to the judge why he is skipping a question from the deposition transcript.)
DOJ-OGR-00018779.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,092 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 181 of 264 1619
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
1 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you, your Honor.
2 Q. Do you recall testifying in your deposition, under oath?
3 A. Yes.
4 THE COURT: You can leave it up for reading the
5 question.
6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you, your Honor.
7 THE COURT: Go ahead.
8 Q. You were asked:
9 "Q. Did you read the complaint before it was filed?
10 "A. Yeah, I read the complaint.
11 "Q. Did you -- when you read the complaint, did you notice
12 there was anything missing from it?
13 "A. No, I trust my attorneys. That's why they're my
14 attorneys."
15 Correct?
16 A. Right.
17 Q. And moving on to the next question on the same page:
18 "Q. Did you tell anyone, your lawyers or anybody --
19 THE COURT: Just a second.
20 MR. PAGLIUCA: That question was objected to, your
21 Honor, so I'm not going to read it.
22 THE COURT: Okay.
23 Q. The complaint that you filed in federal court was not
24 against Ms. Maxwell; correct?
25 A. Correct.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018779
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document