Federal Court
LocationRelationship Network
030.pdf
This document is a Clerk's Notice from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida regarding Case No. 08-CV-80804-JIC (Pruco Life Insurance Company vs. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.). It certifies that on May 25, 2011, the court received a deposit of $112,301.53 from Wells Fargo into the court registry.
EFTA00038973.pdf
This document is an email chain from February 2022 between courtroom sketch artist Elizabeth Williams and an unidentified individual. The individual identifies themselves as the person who set up the massage table during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial and seeks to purchase original sketches of themselves and their partner, who testified for the defense. The document includes the email correspondence and four attached images of the sketches in question.
EFTA00031488.pdf
This document is an email chain containing a press release from the United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York, dated July 2, 2020, announcing the arrest and charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell is charged with conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse minors, facilitating abuse, and perjury in connection with 2016 depositions. The press release details Maxwell's alleged role in grooming and abusing minors alongside Epstein in various locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London.
EFTA00029499.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated October 2020, discussing a press inquiry from the NY Daily News. The reporter, Stephen Rex Brown, provides details of a story alleging that in 2016, SDNY prosecutors (specifically an AUSA named Kramer) met with victims' lawyers but declined to pursue new charges against Jeffrey Epstein or perjury charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. The internal SDNY response suggests they have no record of the second meeting mentioned and decide not to push back against the story.
EFTA00021776.pdf
This document contains an email chain discussing the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell, followed by the official press release from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The press release details the charges against Maxwell, including conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse minors and perjury, and outlines the allegations of grooming and abuse spanning from 1994 to 1997. It also includes statements from Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, FBI Assistant Director William F. Sweeney Jr., and NYPD Commissioner Dermot Shea regarding the arrest.
EFTA00021773.pdf
This document is an email chain forwarding an official press release from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated July 2, 2020. It announces the arrest and unsealing of an indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell for her role in conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse minors between 1994 and 1997, as well as perjury charges related to 2016 depositions. The release details the grooming methods used, including financial enticements and normalization of abuse, and includes quotes from high-ranking officials at the SDNY, FBI, and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00018787.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a complaint Carolyn previously filed against Mr. Epstein and Sarah Kellen. Carolyn states she does not recall certain details of the complaint and denies having reviewed or approved it before her lawyers filed it in federal court.
DOJ-OGR-00018786.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing attorney Mr. Pagliuca cross-examining a witness named Carolyn. The questioning centers on a paragraph from a 2009 federal complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, which alleges Epstein paid Carolyn $300 after an encounter. The transcript captures a legal objection by another attorney, Ms. Comey, which the judge sustains.
DOJ-OGR-00018785.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn regarding allegations against Jeffrey Epstein. The testimony, read from a legal filing, describes an incident where Carolyn was paid $300 by Epstein to observe a sexual act performed by her friend on him. It also mentions a subsequent telephone call where Epstein requested Carolyn return to his residence to give him a massage.
DOJ-OGR-00018779.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning references Carolyn's prior deposition testimony, where she affirmed her trust in her attorneys regarding a complaint she filed. The transcript concludes with Carolyn confirming that the complaint she filed in federal court was not against a Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00017202.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Rebuttal by Ms. Comey) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor argues against the defense's conspiracy theory by highlighting the consistency of eight witnesses (including Juan Alessi and accusers like Annie and Carolyn) and pointing out the chronological impossibility of a conspiracy formed in 2019, given that incriminating statements were made to the FBI and in depositions in 2006 and 2009. The prosecutor references corroborating evidence such as flight records, FedEx records, and message pads.
DOJ-OGR-00010220.jpg
This document contains page 5 of a court transcript from March 11, 2022, filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The transcript records the Court granting 'use immunity' to 'Juror 50' after the juror asserted their Fifth Amendment privilege. The judge explains that Juror 50 must testify truthfully and will not be prosecuted for their testimony unless they commit perjury, after which Juror 50 is called to the witness stand.
DOJ-OGR-00009948.jpg
This document is a condensed transcript (pages 221-224) from the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, dated February 15, 2012. It features the testimony of Ms. Conrad, a suspended New York attorney who served as a juror in a complex tax shelter fraud case presided over by Judge Pauley. The questioning revolves around her motives for serving on the jury while suspended, specifically whether she used the service to demonstrate stability for her bar reinstatement petition, which she denies.
DOJ-OGR-00014574.jpg
This document is page 174 of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey is delivering a rebuttal argument, refuting the defense's theory that witnesses (Kate, Carolyn, Annie, Jane) had false memories implanted by the media, the FBI, or greedy lawyers seeking money from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Comey argues there is no evidence the witnesses consumed each other's media interviews or that their lawyers conspired to fabricate stories, noting specifically that Annie's lawyer worked pro bono.
DOJ-OGR-00032997.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017, in which attorney Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness. The questioning centers on the witness's awareness of a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein by their attorney, Mr. Leopold. Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the line of questioning, instructing his client not to reveal any information learned through their privileged attorney-client conversations.
DOJ-OGR-00005196.jpg
This document is a legal argument from a court filing, dated October 12, 2021. The author contends that certain federal statutes, like 18 USC § 3299 and § 3509, intentionally exclude child pornography and exploitation from the definition of sexual abuse, a fact the Justice Department has allegedly always known. The argument is supported by citing 1990 legislative history (VCAA) to claim that Congress intended these laws to apply specifically to federal enclaves.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017661.jpg
This document is Page 26 of a 78-page document, specifically an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article written by David Schoen. The text provides a legal argument criticizing the "Advisory Committee's" proposals regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically arguing against rules that would force victims to disclose their addresses to defendants or participate in face-to-face meetings/depositions without due process. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017642.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, likely authored by Paul Cassell, discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to integrate victim rights. It details the author's submission of twenty-eight changes to the Advisory Committee in 2005 and the subsequent limited adoption of these changes by a subcommittee chaired by Judge James Jones. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017507.jpg
This document is a four-page condensed transcript (pages 66-69) of a deposition of Scott Rothstein. He is questioned by Ms. Haddad regarding the electronic filing of federal court cases via PACER in 2009, specifically concerning a complaint filed by attorney Brad Edwards around July 24th. Rothstein admits that while he lacks specific recollection of the filing or a July 23rd meeting, the case may have been utilized to further his Ponzi scheme. The document ends with a question regarding whether Cara Holmes was an FBI or IRS agent.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029521.jpg
This document is a printout of a news article regarding the Palm House EB-5 fraud case, stamped as a House Oversight record. It details how developer Robert Matthews and contractor Nicholas Laudano pleaded guilty to fraud, misusing investor funds for personal luxuries like a yacht named 'Alibi'. The article highlights the lack of criminal charges against regional center director Joseph Walsh Sr., who allegedly siphoned nearly $9.5 million, and criticizes the lack of regulation in the EB-5 visa program.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012403.jpg
This document is a fragment of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about a $50 million lawsuit filed on their behalf against Jeffrey Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects and instructs the witness not to answer questions if their knowledge comes from their private conversations, citing attorney-client privilege. The witness denies having knowledge of the lawsuit from any other source.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012402.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about a $50 million lawsuit recently filed on their behalf against Jeffrey Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects, citing attorney-client privilege and instructing his client not to answer if their knowledge comes only from their protected conversations. The exchange becomes tense, with Mr. Leopold mistakenly calling the questioning attorney 'Lewis'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity