DOJ-OGR-00014579.jpg
641 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
641 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript of a rebuttal argument by Ms. Comey in a criminal trial. The speaker argues that the witnesses—Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie—have no financial motive to lie in their testimony against the defendant, Maxwell, as their civil cases are settled and they have already received compensation. The speaker specifically addresses and dismisses a defense claim regarding a conversation between Jane's lawyer and a prosecutor, asserting it does not constitute evidence of a financial incentive for testifying.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell |
Mentioned as the subject of testimony by Alessi.
|
|
| Alessi |
Mentioned as a witness who testified about Maxwell and has no reason to lie.
|
|
| Jane | Witness/Victim |
Mentioned as a witness with no motive to lie. Her lawyer's conversation with a prosecutor is discussed.
|
| Kate | Witness/Victim |
Mentioned as a witness with no motive to lie and no financial stake in the trial.
|
| Carolyn | Witness/Victim |
Mentioned as a witness with no motive to lie and no financial stake in the trial.
|
| Annie | Witness/Victim |
Mentioned as a witness with no motive to lie and no financial stake in the trial.
|
| Ms. Comey | Speaker (likely prosecutor) |
Identified in the header as the speaker delivering the rebuttal.
|
| Jane's lawyer | Lawyer |
Mentioned in relation to a stipulation and a conversation with a prosecutor in 2021.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service.
|
Relationships (2)
The document discusses a stipulation about Jane's lawyer and a conversation he had with a prosecutor regarding Jane's case.
The document describes them as witnesses testifying against Maxwell in a trial.
Key Quotes (3)
"The defense's only explanation for why they would perjure themselves on that stand is money. But the facts just do not support that."Source
— Ms. Comey
(Arguing against the defense's claim that the witnesses have a financial motive.)
DOJ-OGR-00014579.jpg
Quote #1
"Remember, the victim compensation fund is finished; the civil cases are done. There's nothing pending. These women have already received millions of dollars. They are not getting a penny more."Source
— Ms. Comey
(Explaining why there is no financial incentive for the witnesses to lie.)
DOJ-OGR-00014579.jpg
Quote #2
"You heard Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie each tell you unequivocally they have no financial stake in the outcome of this trial."Source
— Ms. Comey
(Summarizing the testimony of the witnesses regarding their financial interests.)
DOJ-OGR-00014579.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,656 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 179 of 257 3013
LCKVMAX8
Rebuttal - Ms. Comey
LCKVMAX8
Rebuttal - Ms. Comey
1 Maxwell was exactly who Alessi said she was. And just like the
2 ex-boyfriends, Alessi has no reason to lie to you.
3 Second. Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie have no motive
4 to lie at this trial. The defense's only explanation for why
5 they would perjure themselves on that stand is money. But the
6 facts just do not support that. Remember, the victim
7 compensation fund is finished; the civil cases are done.
8 There's nothing pending. These women have already received
9 millions of dollars. They are not getting a penny more.
10 Now, the defense tried to point you to this
11 stipulation about Jane's lawyer. I'd encourage you to take a
12 look at it. Look at the whole stipulation. You'll see it
13 doesn't change anything I've said. Jane's lawyer told the
14 prosecutor that he remembered telling Jane that testifying
15 would be the morally right thing to do and that it could help
16 her case. But to be clear, that conversation with that
17 prosecutor occurred in 2021, long after Jane's civil case was
18 settled, long after she already received her award from the
19 fund. So there was no case to help. Whatever the lawyer meant
20 by that, there is absolutely no evidence that Jane had any
21 financial incentive to testify at this trial. There's no money
22 to be had. You heard Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie each tell
23 you unequivocally they have no financial stake in the outcome
24 of this trial. This verdict will have zero impact on the money
25 they received.
2 ex-boyfriends, Alessi has no reason to lie to you.
3 Second. Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie have no motive
4 to lie at this trial. The defense's only explanation for why
5 they would perjure themselves on that stand is money. But the
6 facts just do not support that. Remember, the victim
7 compensation fund is finished; the civil cases are done.
8 There's nothing pending. These women have already received
9 millions of dollars. They are not getting a penny more.
10 Now, the defense tried to point you to this
11 stipulation about Jane's lawyer. I'd encourage you to take a
12 look at it. Look at the whole stipulation. You'll see it
13 doesn't change anything I've said. Jane's lawyer told the
14 prosecutor that he remembered telling Jane that testifying
15 would be the morally right thing to do and that it could help
16 her case. But to be clear, that conversation with that
17 prosecutor occurred in 2021, long after Jane's civil case was
18 settled, long after she already received her award from the
19 fund. So there was no case to help. Whatever the lawyer meant
20 by that, there is absolutely no evidence that Jane had any
21 financial incentive to testify at this trial. There's no money
22 to be had. You heard Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie each tell
23 you unequivocally they have no financial stake in the outcome
24 of this trial. This verdict will have zero impact on the money
25 they received.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014579
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document