Jane's lawyer
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
JANE
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
prosecutor
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Claim submission | Jane participated in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, where she signed a claim form pre... | N/A | View |
| 2021-01-01 | Conversation | A conversation between Jane's lawyer and a prosecutor regarding Jane's testimony. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017766.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features a legal argument during the cross-examination of a witness identified as 'Jane.' Ms. Menninger attempts to question Jane about her knowledge of statements her lawyer made to the government regarding how her testimony might impact civil litigation. Ms. Moe (Jane's counsel) objects, arguing that this line of questioning is an attempt to bypass attorney-client privilege and does not constitute valid impeachment.
DOJ-OGR-00017689.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) involving a sidebar discussion between the defense (Ms. Menninger), the prosecution (Ms. Moe), and the Judge. The defense argues for the right to cross-examine a witness named 'Jane' regarding her participation in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program to show bias or financial motivation. Specifically, the defense highlights that Jane was offered $5 million but her lawyer rejected it, filing a motion for reconsideration to demand an 'eight-figure settlement' (at least $10 million).
DOJ-OGR-00008380.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 15, 2021, discusses the defendant's attempt to introduce statements from Robert Glassman to impeach a witness named Jane. The document details Jane's evolving testimony about a trip to New York with Epstein and the defendant to see 'The Lion King,' noting that her corrected recollections were communicated to the Government by her lawyer. The prosecution argues that Glassman's testimony on these same points is unnecessary and that questions about Jane's conversations with him were met with sustained objections.
DOJ-OGR-00017200.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a rebuttal argument given by Ms. Comey. She argues that the witnesses—Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie—have no financial motive to lie, as their civil cases are settled and the victim compensation fund they were paid from is finished. Ms. Comey refutes the defense's implication of a financial incentive for Jane by clarifying that a conversation between Jane's lawyer and a prosecutor occurred in 2021, long after Jane had already received her financial award.
DOJ-OGR-00014579.jpg
This document is a transcript of a rebuttal argument by Ms. Comey in a criminal trial. The speaker argues that the witnesses—Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie—have no financial motive to lie in their testimony against the defendant, Maxwell, as their civil cases are settled and they have already received compensation. The speaker specifically addresses and dismisses a defense claim regarding a conversation between Jane's lawyer and a prosecutor, asserting it does not constitute evidence of a financial incentive for testifying.
Jane's corrected recollection
Jane's lawyer communicated to the Government that Jane had seen The Lion King Broadway show, not the movie, correcting her earlier statement.
Demanding money
The witness, Jane, is questioned about whether her lawyer sent a letter to Ghislaine demanding money, but she states she does not know.
Client's intention/Civil litigation
Statement regarding the impact of Jane's participation on civil litigation.
Motion for Reconsideration
Argument that the initial award was inappropriate and should be at least eight figures.
Jane testifying
Jane's lawyer told the prosecutor he remembered telling Jane that testifying would be the morally right thing to do and could help her case. The speaker notes this conversation occurred long after Jane's civil case was settled and she had received her award.
Jane's testimony
Jane's lawyer told the prosecutor he remembered telling Jane that testifying was the morally right thing to do and could help her case. This conversation occurred long after her civil case was settled.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity